We've found
161,353
archived clinical trials in
Cancer
We've found
161,353
archived clinical trials in
Cancer
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Reduced-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Randomized Phase II Trial for Patients With p16 Positive, Non-Smoking Associated, Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus Trisulfate Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus a Trisulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution Using 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen in Adults
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Exploring the Neuro-Immune Basis of Cancer-Related Fatigue Using Behavioral Measures
Updated: 12/31/1969
Exploring the Neuro-Immune Basis of Cancer-Related Fatigue Using Behavioral Measures
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Exploring the Neuro-Immune Basis of Cancer-Related Fatigue Using Behavioral Measures
Updated: 12/31/1969
Exploring the Neuro-Immune Basis of Cancer-Related Fatigue Using Behavioral Measures
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, a Fully Human Antibody Against PD-1, in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials