Clinical Research Trials Archive – Closed Trials

This is our archive of closed clinical trials, which means that they are no longer accepting new participants or have been concluded. Once a research facility has chosen to close the study, it is sorted into the GPS archive by indication. If you are interested in enrolling in a clinical trial, then please browse our list of active clinical studies.

Zip code

Condition


Search Radius:25 Miles
  • 5
  • 10
  • 15
  • 20
  • 25
  • 30
  • 40
  • 50
  • 100
  • 500
  • All

We've found
161,353
archived clinical trials in
Cancer

Efficacy and Tolerability of ZD6474 in Patients With Thyroid Cancer
An Open Label, Two Stage, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of ZD6474 in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Durham, NC
Efficacy and Tolerability of ZD6474 in Patients With Thyroid Cancer
An Open Label, Two Stage, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of ZD6474 in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Durham, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Tolerability of ZD6474 in Patients With Thyroid Cancer
An Open Label, Two Stage, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of ZD6474 in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Houston, TX
Efficacy and Tolerability of ZD6474 in Patients With Thyroid Cancer
An Open Label, Two Stage, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of ZD6474 in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Houston, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Tolerability of ZD6474 in Patients With Thyroid Cancer
An Open Label, Two Stage, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of ZD6474 in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Research Site
mi
from
Villejuif Cedex,
Efficacy and Tolerability of ZD6474 in Patients With Thyroid Cancer
An Open Label, Two Stage, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of ZD6474 in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Research Site
mi
from
Villejuif Cedex,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
New Britain, CT
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
New Britain, CT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Crystal River, FL
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Crystal River, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Urbana, IL
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Urbana, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Detroit, MI
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Detroit, MI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Kansas City, MO
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Kansas City, MO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Voorhees, NJ
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Voorhees, NJ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Greenville, NC
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Greenville, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Pasadena, TX
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Pasadena, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
West Bend, WI
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
West Bend, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Research Site
mi
from
Brasschaat,
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Research Site
mi
from
Brasschaat,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
MS-275 and Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia, or Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Dose-Finding Trial of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor MS-275 (NSC 706995) in Combination With 5-Azacitidine (5AC, NSC 102816) in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMMoL) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Johns Hopkins University-Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
MS-275 and Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia, or Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Dose-Finding Trial of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor MS-275 (NSC 706995) in Combination With 5-Azacitidine (5AC, NSC 102816) in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMMoL) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Johns Hopkins University-Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
MS-275 and Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia, or Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Dose-Finding Trial of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor MS-275 (NSC 706995) in Combination With 5-Azacitidine (5AC, NSC 102816) in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMMoL) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
mi
from
New York, NY
MS-275 and Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia, or Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Dose-Finding Trial of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor MS-275 (NSC 706995) in Combination With 5-Azacitidine (5AC, NSC 102816) in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMMoL) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
mi
from
New York, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
MS-275 and Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia, or Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Dose-Finding Trial of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor MS-275 (NSC 706995) in Combination With 5-Azacitidine (5AC, NSC 102816) in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMMoL) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Mount Sinai Hosp
mi
from
New York, NY
MS-275 and Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia, or Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Dose-Finding Trial of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor MS-275 (NSC 706995) in Combination With 5-Azacitidine (5AC, NSC 102816) in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMMoL) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Mount Sinai Hosp
mi
from
New York, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Proton Beam Radiation Therapy in Treating Young Patients Who Have Undergone Biopsy or Surgery for Medulloblastoma or Pineoblastoma
Phase II Study of Craniospinal and Posterior Fossa Irradiation Using Proton Beam Radiotherapy for Medulloblastoma and Pineoblastoma: Assessment of Acute and Long Term Sequelae
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Massachusetts General Hospital
mi
from
Boston, MA
Proton Beam Radiation Therapy in Treating Young Patients Who Have Undergone Biopsy or Surgery for Medulloblastoma or Pineoblastoma
Phase II Study of Craniospinal and Posterior Fossa Irradiation Using Proton Beam Radiotherapy for Medulloblastoma and Pineoblastoma: Assessment of Acute and Long Term Sequelae
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Massachusetts General Hospital
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
mi
from
Scottsdale, AZ
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
mi
from
Scottsdale, AZ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of California Davis Cancer Center
mi
from
Sacramento, CA
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of California Davis Cancer Center
mi
from
Sacramento, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville
mi
from
Jacksonville, FL
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville
mi
from
Jacksonville, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Evanston Hospital
mi
from
Evanston, IL
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Evanston Hospital
mi
from
Evanston, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Cancer Institute at St. John's Hospital
mi
from
Springfield, IL
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Cancer Institute at St. John's Hospital
mi
from
Springfield, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Regional Cancer Center at Memorial Medical Center
mi
from
Springfield, IL
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Regional Cancer Center at Memorial Medical Center
mi
from
Springfield, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Simmons Cooper Cancer Institute
mi
from
Springfield, IL
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Simmons Cooper Cancer Institute
mi
from
Springfield, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Cancer Institute at St. Joseph Medical Center
mi
from
Towson, MD
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Cancer Institute at St. Joseph Medical Center
mi
from
Towson, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Boston University Cancer Research Center
mi
from
Boston, MA
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Boston University Cancer Research Center
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
mi
from
Ann Arbor, MI
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
mi
from
Ann Arbor, MI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
mi
from
Rochester, MN
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
mi
from
Rochester, MN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Saint Louis
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Saint Louis
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
mi
from
Lebanon, NH
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
mi
from
Lebanon, NH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Valley Hospital - Ridgewood
mi
from
Ridgewood, NJ
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Valley Hospital - Ridgewood
mi
from
Ridgewood, NJ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
South Nassau Communities Hospital
mi
from
Oceanside, NY
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
South Nassau Communities Hospital
mi
from
Oceanside, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
James P. Wilmot Cancer Center at University of Rochester Medical Center
mi
from
Rochester, NY
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
James P. Wilmot Cancer Center at University of Rochester Medical Center
mi
from
Rochester, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
SUNY Upstate Medical University Hospital
mi
from
Syracuse, NY
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
SUNY Upstate Medical University Hospital
mi
from
Syracuse, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Presbyterian Cancer Center at Presbyterian Hospital
mi
from
Charlotte, NC
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Presbyterian Cancer Center at Presbyterian Hospital
mi
from
Charlotte, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Charles M. Barrett Cancer Center at University Hospital
mi
from
Cincinnati, OH
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Charles M. Barrett Cancer Center at University Hospital
mi
from
Cincinnati, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health and Science University
mi
from
Portland, OR
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health and Science University
mi
from
Portland, OR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Jameson Memorial Hospital - North Campus
mi
from
New Castle, PA
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Jameson Memorial Hospital - North Campus
mi
from
New Castle, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Fox Chase Cancer Center - Philadelphia
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Fox Chase Cancer Center - Philadelphia
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital
mi
from
Pittsburgh, PA
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital
mi
from
Pittsburgh, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
UPMC Cancer Centers
mi
from
Pittsburgh, PA
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
UPMC Cancer Centers
mi
from
Pittsburgh, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
McGlinn Family Regional Cancer Center at Reading Hospital and Medical Center
mi
from
Reading, PA
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
McGlinn Family Regional Cancer Center at Reading Hospital and Medical Center
mi
from
Reading, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Rhode Island Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center
mi
from
Providence, RI
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Rhode Island Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center
mi
from
Providence, RI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Miriam Hospital
mi
from
Providence, RI
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Miriam Hospital
mi
from
Providence, RI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
U.T. Medical Center Cancer Institute
mi
from
Knoxville, TN
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
U.T. Medical Center Cancer Institute
mi
from
Knoxville, TN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Methodist Hospital
mi
from
Houston, TX
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection Versus Sublobar Resection Plus Brachytherapy in High Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 3cm or Smaller
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Methodist Hospital
mi
from
Houston, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials