Clinical Research Trials Archive – Closed Trials

This is our archive of closed clinical trials, which means that they are no longer accepting new participants or have been concluded. Once a research facility has chosen to close the study, it is sorted into the GPS archive by indication. If you are interested in enrolling in a clinical trial, then please browse our list of active clinical studies.

Zip code

Condition


Search Radius:25 Miles
  • 5
  • 10
  • 15
  • 20
  • 25
  • 30
  • 40
  • 50
  • 100
  • 500
  • All

We've found
161,353
archived clinical trials in
Cancer

Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Huntington, WV
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Edwards Comprehensive Cancer Center at Cabell Huntington Hospital
mi
from
Huntington, WV
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Chippewa Falls, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Marshfield Clinic - Chippewa Center
mi
from
Chippewa Falls, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Eau Claire, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Marshfield Clinic Cancer Care at Regional Cancer Center
mi
from
Eau Claire, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Eau Claire, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Luther Midlelfort Hospital
mi
from
Eau Claire, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Eau Claire, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Midelfort Clinic - Luther
mi
from
Eau Claire, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Elkhorn, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Vince Lombardi Cancer Center at Aurora Lakeland Medical Center - Elkhorn
mi
from
Elkhorn, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Green Bay, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic - Green Bay at Aurora BayCare Medical Center
mi
from
Green Bay, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Janesville, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Mercy Regional Cancer Center
mi
from
Janesville, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Johnson Creek, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
UW Cancer Center Johnson Creek
mi
from
Johnson Creek, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
La Crosse, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Franciscan Skemp Healthcare - La Crosse Campus
mi
from
La Crosse, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
La Crosse, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Gundersen Lutheran Center for Cancer and Blood
mi
from
La Crosse, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Madison, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Dean Medical Center - Madison
mi
from
Madison, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Madison, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
University of Wisconsin Paul P. Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center
mi
from
Madison, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Manitowoc, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Holy Family Memorial Medical Center Cancer Care Center
mi
from
Manitowoc, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Marinette, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic - Marinette
mi
from
Marinette, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Marshfield, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Marshfield Clinic - Marshfield Center
mi
from
Marshfield, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Marshfield, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Saint Joseph's Hospital
mi
from
Marshfield, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Mequon, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Columbia Saint Mary's Hospital - Ozaukee
mi
from
Mequon, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Milwaukee, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Aurora Sinai Medical Center
mi
from
Milwaukee, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Milwaukee, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Columbia-Saint Mary's Cancer Care Center
mi
from
Milwaukee, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Milwaukee, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Medical Consultants, Limited
mi
from
Milwaukee, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Minocqua, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Marshfield Clinic - Lakeland Center
mi
from
Minocqua, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Oconomowoc, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Regional Cancer Center at Oconomowoc Memorial Hospital
mi
from
Oconomowoc, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Rhinelander, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Ministry Medical Group at Saint Mary's Hospital
mi
from
Rhinelander, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Rice Lake, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Marshfield Clinic - Indianhead Center
mi
from
Rice Lake, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Sheboygan, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic - Sheboygan
mi
from
Sheboygan, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Stevens Point, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Saint Michael's Hospital Cancer Center
mi
from
Stevens Point, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Summit, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Aurora Medical Center
mi
from
Summit, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Two Rivers, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic - Two Rivers
mi
from
Two Rivers, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Waukesha, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Waukesha Memorial Hospital Regional Cancer Center
mi
from
Waukesha, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Wausau, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Marshfield Clinic - Wausau Center
mi
from
Wausau, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Wisconsin Rapids, WI
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Marshfield Clinic - Wisconsin Rapids Center
mi
from
Wisconsin Rapids, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Sheridan, WY
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Welch Cancer Center at Sheridan Memorial Hospital
mi
from
Sheridan, WY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Pretoria,
Four Versus Six Cycles of Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Breast Cancer
Cyclophosphamide And Doxorubicin (CA) (4 VS 6 Cycles) Versus Paclitaxel (4 VS 6 Cycles) As Adjuvant Therapy For Breast Cancer in Women With 0-3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes:A 2X2 Factorial Phase III Randomized Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Pretoria Academic Hospital
mi
from
Pretoria,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Scottsdale, AZ
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
mi
from
Scottsdale, AZ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Aurora, CO
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Aurora Presbyterian Hospital
mi
from
Aurora, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Boulder, CO
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Boulder Community Hospital
mi
from
Boulder, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Colorado Springs, CO
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Penrose Cancer Center at Penrose Hospital
mi
from
Colorado Springs, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Denver, CO
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
St. Anthony Central Hospital
mi
from
Denver, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Denver, CO
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Porter Adventist Hospital
mi
from
Denver, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Denver, CO
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Presbyterian - St. Luke's Medical Center
mi
from
Denver, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Denver, CO
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
St. Joseph Hospital
mi
from
Denver, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Denver, CO
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Rose Medical Center
mi
from
Denver, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Denver, CO
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
CCOP - Colorado Cancer Research Program, Inc.
mi
from
Denver, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Englewood, CO
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Swedish Medical Center
mi
from
Englewood, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Fort Collins, CO
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Front Range Cancer Specialists
mi
from
Fort Collins, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Grand Junction, CO
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
St. Mary's Regional Cancer Center at St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center
mi
from
Grand Junction, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Greeley, CO
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
North Colorado Medical Center
mi
from
Greeley, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Lone Tree, CO
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Sky Ridge Medical Center
mi
from
Lone Tree, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  8/11/2016
mi
from
Longmont, CO
Pemetrexed, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase II First-Line Study of a Combination of Pemetrexed, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 70 Yrs) With Good Performance Status (PS < 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 8/11/2016
Hope Cancer Care Center at Longmont United Hospital
mi
from
Longmont, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials