Clinical Research Trials Archive – Closed Trials

This is our archive of closed clinical trials, which means that they are no longer accepting new participants or have been concluded. Once a research facility has chosen to close the study, it is sorted into the GPS archive by indication. If you are interested in enrolling in a clinical trial, then please browse our list of active clinical studies.

Zip code

Condition


Search Radius:25 Miles
  • 5
  • 10
  • 15
  • 20
  • 25
  • 30
  • 40
  • 50
  • 100
  • 500
  • All

We've found
15,024
archived clinical trials in
Infectious Disease

Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Savannah, GA
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Savannah, GA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
South Bend, IN
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
South Bend, IN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Overland Park, KA
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Overland Park, KA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
New Orleans, LA
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
New Orleans, LA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Grand Blanc, MI
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Grand Blanc, MI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Butte, MT
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Butte, MT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Omaha, NE
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Omaha, NE
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Brooklyn, NY
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Brooklyn, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Carlisle, OH
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Carlisle, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Tulsa, OK
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Tulsa, OK
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Corvallis, OR
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Corvallis, OR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Gresham, OR
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Gresham, OR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Portland, OR
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Portland, OR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Hazleton, PA
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Hazleton, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Pittsburgh, PA
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Pittsburgh, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Dallas, TX
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Dallas, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Duncanville, TX
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Duncanville, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Fort Worth, TX
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Fort Worth, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Houston, TX
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Houston, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Layton, UT
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Layton, UT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Charlottesville, VA
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Charlottesville, VA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Retapamulin Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of SITL and Impetigo Due to MRSA
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/25/2016
GSK Investigational Site
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Risk Factors and Potential Causes of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction in Adults
Risk Factors and Potential Causes of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction in Adults With Clinically Diagnosed Chronic Otitis Media With Effusion and/or Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/26/2016
Middle Ear Physiology Laboratory of Children's Hospital of PIttsburgh of UPMC
mi
from
Pittsburgh, PA
Risk Factors and Potential Causes of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction in Adults
Risk Factors and Potential Causes of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction in Adults With Clinically Diagnosed Chronic Otitis Media With Effusion and/or Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/26/2016
Middle Ear Physiology Laboratory of Children's Hospital of PIttsburgh of UPMC
mi
from
Pittsburgh, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Donor Atorvastatin Treatment for Preventing Severe Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Patients Undergoing Myeloablative Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
Donor Statin Treatment for Prevention of Severe Acute GVHD After Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/26/2016
Stanford University Hospitals and Clinics
mi
from
Stanford, CA
Donor Atorvastatin Treatment for Preventing Severe Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Patients Undergoing Myeloablative Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
Donor Statin Treatment for Prevention of Severe Acute GVHD After Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/26/2016
Stanford University Hospitals and Clinics
mi
from
Stanford, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Donor Atorvastatin Treatment for Preventing Severe Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Patients Undergoing Myeloablative Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
Donor Statin Treatment for Prevention of Severe Acute GVHD After Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/26/2016
Colorado Blood Cancer Institute
mi
from
Denver, CO
Donor Atorvastatin Treatment for Preventing Severe Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Patients Undergoing Myeloablative Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
Donor Statin Treatment for Prevention of Severe Acute GVHD After Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/26/2016
Colorado Blood Cancer Institute
mi
from
Denver, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Donor Atorvastatin Treatment for Preventing Severe Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Patients Undergoing Myeloablative Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
Donor Statin Treatment for Prevention of Severe Acute GVHD After Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/26/2016
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Donor Atorvastatin Treatment for Preventing Severe Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Patients Undergoing Myeloablative Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
Donor Statin Treatment for Prevention of Severe Acute GVHD After Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/26/2016
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Bacterial Contamination of Operative Splash Basins
Bacterial Contamination of Operative Splash Basins: Can it be Prevented?
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/26/2016
University of Utah Orthopaedic Center
mi
from
Salt Lake City, UT
Bacterial Contamination of Operative Splash Basins
Bacterial Contamination of Operative Splash Basins: Can it be Prevented?
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/26/2016
University of Utah Orthopaedic Center
mi
from
Salt Lake City, UT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Boston, MA
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Florence, AL
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Florence, AL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Mobile, AL
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Mobile, AL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Glendale, CA
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Glendale, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
La Mesa, CA
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
La Mesa, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Torrance, CA
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Torrance, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Aurora, IL
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Aurora, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Carmel, IN
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Carmel, IN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Springfield, MA
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Springfield, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Minneapolis, MN
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Minneapolis, MN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Las Vegas, NV
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Las Vegas, NV
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Camden, NJ
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Camden, NJ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Teaneck, NJ
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Teaneck, NJ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Columbus, OH
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Columbus, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
mi
from
Weston, OH
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
mi
from
Weston, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Houston, TX
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Houston, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  2/29/2016
Research Site
mi
from
Cordoba,
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 2/29/2016
Research Site
mi
from
Cordoba,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Phase 1/2 Study of ThermoDox With Approved Hyperthermia in Treatment of Breast Cancer Recurrence at the Chest Wall
A Phase I/II Study Evaluating the Maximum Tolerated Dose, Bioequivalence/Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Hyperthermia and ThermoDox (Lyso-Thermosensitive Liposomal Doxorubucin) in Patients With Local-Regional Recurrent Breast Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  3/1/2016
Southeastern Regional Medical Center
mi
from
Newnan, GA
Phase 1/2 Study of ThermoDox With Approved Hyperthermia in Treatment of Breast Cancer Recurrence at the Chest Wall
A Phase I/II Study Evaluating the Maximum Tolerated Dose, Bioequivalence/Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Hyperthermia and ThermoDox (Lyso-Thermosensitive Liposomal Doxorubucin) in Patients With Local-Regional Recurrent Breast Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 3/1/2016
Southeastern Regional Medical Center
mi
from
Newnan, GA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Phase 1/2 Study of ThermoDox With Approved Hyperthermia in Treatment of Breast Cancer Recurrence at the Chest Wall
A Phase I/II Study Evaluating the Maximum Tolerated Dose, Bioequivalence/Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Hyperthermia and ThermoDox (Lyso-Thermosensitive Liposomal Doxorubucin) in Patients With Local-Regional Recurrent Breast Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  3/1/2016
University of Maryland
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Phase 1/2 Study of ThermoDox With Approved Hyperthermia in Treatment of Breast Cancer Recurrence at the Chest Wall
A Phase I/II Study Evaluating the Maximum Tolerated Dose, Bioequivalence/Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Hyperthermia and ThermoDox (Lyso-Thermosensitive Liposomal Doxorubucin) in Patients With Local-Regional Recurrent Breast Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 3/1/2016
University of Maryland
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Phase 1/2 Study of ThermoDox With Approved Hyperthermia in Treatment of Breast Cancer Recurrence at the Chest Wall
A Phase I/II Study Evaluating the Maximum Tolerated Dose, Bioequivalence/Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Hyperthermia and ThermoDox (Lyso-Thermosensitive Liposomal Doxorubucin) in Patients With Local-Regional Recurrent Breast Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  3/1/2016
Southwestern Regional Medical Center
mi
from
Tulsa, OK
Phase 1/2 Study of ThermoDox With Approved Hyperthermia in Treatment of Breast Cancer Recurrence at the Chest Wall
A Phase I/II Study Evaluating the Maximum Tolerated Dose, Bioequivalence/Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Hyperthermia and ThermoDox (Lyso-Thermosensitive Liposomal Doxorubucin) in Patients With Local-Regional Recurrent Breast Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 3/1/2016
Southwestern Regional Medical Center
mi
from
Tulsa, OK
Click here to add this to my saved trials