Clinical Research Trials Archive – Closed Trials

This is our archive of closed clinical trials, which means that they are no longer accepting new participants or have been concluded. Once a research facility has chosen to close the study, it is sorted into the GPS archive by indication. If you are interested in enrolling in a clinical trial, then please browse our list of active clinical studies.

Zip code

Condition


Search Radius:25 Miles
  • 5
  • 10
  • 15
  • 20
  • 25
  • 30
  • 40
  • 50
  • 100
  • 500
  • All

We've found
35,033
archived clinical trials in
Lung Cancer

Video-Based Intervention in Reducing Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Screening
Pilot Study of a Video-Based Intervention to Reduce Psychological Harm Associated With Lung Cancer Screening
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Duarte, CA
Video-Based Intervention in Reducing Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Screening
Pilot Study of a Video-Based Intervention to Reduce Psychological Harm Associated With Lung Cancer Screening
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
City of Hope Medical Center
mi
from
Duarte, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Scottsdale, AZ
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Mayo Clinic - Scottsdale /ID# 129127
mi
from
Scottsdale, AZ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Aurora, CO
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Colorado Cancer Center /ID# 129220
mi
from
Aurora, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Atlanta, GA
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Emory University Hospital /ID# 141682
mi
from
Atlanta, GA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Augusta, GA
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Georgia Regents University /ID# 148567
mi
from
Augusta, GA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Chicago, IL
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Northwestern University /ID# 137088
mi
from
Chicago, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Lansing, MI
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Herbert Herman Cancer Center /ID# 167020
mi
from
Lansing, MI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Canton, OH
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Gabrail Cancer Center Research /ID# 129216
mi
from
Canton, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Pittsburgh, PA
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Allegheny General Hospital /ID# 147328
mi
from
Pittsburgh, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Houston, TX
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Univ TX, MD Anderson /ID# 129213
mi
from
Houston, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Wollongong,
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Southern Medical Day Care Ctr /ID# 155498
mi
from
Wollongong,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Jacksonville, FL
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Cancer Specialists; North Florida ;Jacksonville (AC Skinner Pkwy)
mi
from
Jacksonville, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Chicago, IL
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Rush University Medical Center
mi
from
Chicago, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Detroit, MI
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Karmanos Cancer Institute
mi
from
Detroit, MI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Chapel Hill, NC
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
mi
from
Chapel Hill, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Seattle, WA
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Berlin,
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
HELIOS Klinikum Emil von Behring Klinik f.Pneumologie Onkologie u.Infektiologie
mi
from
Berlin,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Safety and Efficacy of LEE011 and Ceritinib in Patients With ALK-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
A Phase Ib/II Study of the ALK Inhibitor Ceritinib in Combination With the CDK4/6 Inhibitor LEE011 in Patients With ALK-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Marseille cedex 05,
Study of Safety and Efficacy of LEE011 and Ceritinib in Patients With ALK-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
A Phase Ib/II Study of the ALK Inhibitor Ceritinib in Combination With the CDK4/6 Inhibitor LEE011 in Patients With ALK-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Novartis Investigative Site
mi
from
Marseille cedex 05,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Safety and Efficacy of LEE011 and Ceritinib in Patients With ALK-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
A Phase Ib/II Study of the ALK Inhibitor Ceritinib in Combination With the CDK4/6 Inhibitor LEE011 in Patients With ALK-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Boston, MA
Study of Safety and Efficacy of LEE011 and Ceritinib in Patients With ALK-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
A Phase Ib/II Study of the ALK Inhibitor Ceritinib in Combination With the CDK4/6 Inhibitor LEE011 in Patients With ALK-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Novartis Investigative site
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Santa Rosa, CA
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Santa Rosa, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
West Hills, CA
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
West Hills, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Tampa, FL
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Tampa, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Atlanta, GA
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Atlanta, GA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Marietta, GA
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Marietta, GA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Louisville, KY
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Louisville, KY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Bethesda, MD
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Bethesda, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Bethesda, MD
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Bethesda, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Boston, MA
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Minneapolis, MN
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Minneapolis, MN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Lebanon, NH
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Lebanon, NH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Burlington, VT
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Burlington, VT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Camperdown,
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
mi
from
Camperdown,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Salisbury, NC
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Salisbury, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Anaheim, CA
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Anaheim, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Loma Linda, CA
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Loma Linda University
mi
from
Loma Linda, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Long Beach, CA
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Pacific Shores Medical Group SC
mi
from
Long Beach, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Indianapolis, IN
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Indiana University Hospital IU Health - SC
mi
from
Indianapolis, IN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Maryland Medical Center UM Greenbaum Cancer Ctr
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Rockville, MD
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Maryland Oncology Hematology, P.A. SC-2
mi
from
Rockville, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Belleville, NJ
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Essex Oncology of North Jersey PA SC
mi
from
Belleville, NJ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Greenville, SC
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Greenville Health System SC
mi
from
Greenville, SC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Salt Lake City, UT
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Utah Cancer Specialists Dept.of Utah Cancer Spec. (3)
mi
from
Salt Lake City, UT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Virginia Mason Medical Center-Oncology SC
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Fayetteville, AR
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Highlands Oncology Group, P.A.
mi
from
Fayetteville, AR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Auckland,
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Novartis Investigative Site
mi
from
Auckland,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Birmingham, AL
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Children's Hospital of Alabama
mi
from
Birmingham, AL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Anchorage, AK
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Providence Alaska Medical Center
mi
from
Anchorage, AK
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Phoenix, AZ
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Phoenix Children's Hospital
mi
from
Phoenix, AZ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Tucson, AZ
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Arizona Medical Center University Campus
mi
from
Tucson, AZ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Little Rock, AR
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Arkansas Children's Hospital
mi
from
Little Rock, AR
Click here to add this to my saved trials