We've found
35,033
archived clinical trials in
Lung Cancer
We've found
35,033
archived clinical trials in
Lung Cancer
Video-Based Intervention in Reducing Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Screening
Updated: 12/31/1969
Pilot Study of a Video-Based Intervention to Reduce Psychological Harm Associated With Lung Cancer Screening
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Video-Based Intervention in Reducing Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Screening
Updated: 12/31/1969
Pilot Study of a Video-Based Intervention to Reduce Psychological Harm Associated With Lung Cancer Screening
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Dose Escalation and Double-blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide in Treatment-naive Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Study of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin and Etoposide as a Therapy of Treatment-Naïve Extensive Stage Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)2 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With HER2 IHC-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Received At Least One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Study of Safety and Efficacy of LEE011 and Ceritinib in Patients With ALK-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase Ib/II Study of the ALK Inhibitor Ceritinib in Combination With the CDK4/6 Inhibitor LEE011 in Patients With ALK-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Study of Safety and Efficacy of LEE011 and Ceritinib in Patients With ALK-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase Ib/II Study of the ALK Inhibitor Ceritinib in Combination With the CDK4/6 Inhibitor LEE011 in Patients With ALK-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Study of Safety and Efficacy of LEE011 and Ceritinib in Patients With ALK-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase Ib/II Study of the ALK Inhibitor Ceritinib in Combination With the CDK4/6 Inhibitor LEE011 in Patients With ALK-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Study of Safety and Efficacy of LEE011 and Ceritinib in Patients With ALK-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase Ib/II Study of the ALK Inhibitor Ceritinib in Combination With the CDK4/6 Inhibitor LEE011 in Patients With ALK-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD9291 Versus a Standard of Care Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First Line Treatment in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Lower Doses of Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal Versus 750 mg of Ceritinib in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Updated: 12/31/1969
A Multi-center, Randomized Open Label Study to Assess the Systemic Exposure, Effiacy, and Safety of 450 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal and 600 mg Ceritinib Taken With a Low-fat Meal as Compared With That of 750 mg Ceritinib Taken in the Fasted State in Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive) Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Updated: 12/31/1969
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Updated: 12/31/1969
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Updated: 12/31/1969
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Updated: 12/31/1969
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Updated: 12/31/1969
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Updated: 12/31/1969
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Updated: 12/31/1969
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Updated: 12/31/1969
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Updated: 12/31/1969
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Ganitumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Updated: 12/31/1969
Randomized Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Addition of the IGF-1R Monoclonal Antibody Ganitumab (AMG 479, NSC# 750008) to Multiagent Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Click here to add this to my saved trials
