Clinical Research Trials Archive – Closed Trials

This is our archive of closed clinical trials, which means that they are no longer accepting new participants or have been concluded. Once a research facility has chosen to close the study, it is sorted into the GPS archive by indication. If you are interested in enrolling in a clinical trial, then please browse our list of active clinical studies.

Zip code

Condition


Search Radius:25 Miles
  • 5
  • 10
  • 15
  • 20
  • 25
  • 30
  • 40
  • 50
  • 100
  • 500
  • All

We've found
17,797
archived clinical trials in
Peripheral Vascular Disease

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Gundersen Health System
mi
from
La Crosse, WI
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Gundersen Health System
mi
from
La Crosse, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Wisconsin
mi
from
Madison, WI
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Wisconsin
mi
from
Madison, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Alberta
mi
from
Edmonton,
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Alberta
mi
from
Edmonton,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Columbia University Medical Center and the New York Presbyterian Hospital
mi
from
New York, NY
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Columbia University Medical Center and the New York Presbyterian Hospital
mi
from
New York, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
mi
from
Winston-Salem, NC
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
mi
from
Winston-Salem, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
The Reading Health System
mi
from
West Reading, PA
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
The Reading Health System
mi
from
West Reading, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of California at Los Angeles
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of California at Los Angeles
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Stanford University
mi
from
Stanford, CA
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Stanford University
mi
from
Stanford, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Yale University
mi
from
New Haven, CT
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Yale University
mi
from
New Haven, CT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
HealthPark Lee Memorial Health Systems
mi
from
Fort Myers, FL
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
HealthPark Lee Memorial Health Systems
mi
from
Fort Myers, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Iowa
mi
from
Iowa City, IA
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Iowa
mi
from
Iowa City, IA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Ohio State University
mi
from
Columbus, OH
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Ohio State University
mi
from
Columbus, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Erlanger Health System
mi
from
Chattanooga, TN
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Erlanger Health System
mi
from
Chattanooga, TN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
WakeMed Health and Hospitals
mi
from
Raleigh, NC
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
WakeMed Health and Hospitals
mi
from
Raleigh, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Southern California
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Southern California
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Duke University
mi
from
Durham, NC
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Duke University
mi
from
Durham, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Medical University of South Carolina
mi
from
Charleston, SC
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Medical University of South Carolina
mi
from
Charleston, SC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Inova Fairfax Medical Campus
mi
from
Falls Church, VA
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Inova Fairfax Medical Campus
mi
from
Falls Church, VA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Use of Lexiscan for Myocardial Stress Perfusion Computed Tomography With a 3rd Generation Dual Source CT System
Use of Lexiscan for Myocardial Stress Perfusion Computed Tomography With a 3rd Generation Dual Source CT System
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Medical University of South Carolina
mi
from
Charleston, SC
Use of Lexiscan for Myocardial Stress Perfusion Computed Tomography With a 3rd Generation Dual Source CT System
Use of Lexiscan for Myocardial Stress Perfusion Computed Tomography With a 3rd Generation Dual Source CT System
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Medical University of South Carolina
mi
from
Charleston, SC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis in Women With Lupus
Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis in a Sample of Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
mi
from
Bethesda, MD
Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis in Women With Lupus
Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis in a Sample of Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
mi
from
Bethesda, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Effect of Vegetable Oils for Use by the Snack Food Industry on Plasma Lipid Levels and Inflammatory Markers
Effect of Conventional and Reformulated Vegetable Oils for Use by the Snack Food Industry on Plasma Lipid Levels and Inflammatory Markers
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University
mi
from
Boston, MA
Effect of Vegetable Oils for Use by the Snack Food Industry on Plasma Lipid Levels and Inflammatory Markers
Effect of Conventional and Reformulated Vegetable Oils for Use by the Snack Food Industry on Plasma Lipid Levels and Inflammatory Markers
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Behavioral Management of Phosphorus in Hemodialysis Patients
Behavioral Management of Phosphorus in Hemodialysis
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
New York University School of Medicine
mi
from
New York, NY
Behavioral Management of Phosphorus in Hemodialysis Patients
Behavioral Management of Phosphorus in Hemodialysis
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
New York University School of Medicine
mi
from
New York, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Utility of Bowel Ultrasound in Diagnosing Necrotizing Eneterocolitis in Congenital Heart Disease
Pilot Randomized Control Trial of Necrotizing Enterocolitis Screening Using Abdominal Radiograph Versus Bowel Ultrasound Plus Abdominal Radiograph in Congenital Heart Disease Patients
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Children's Mercy Hospital
mi
from
Kansas City, MO
Utility of Bowel Ultrasound in Diagnosing Necrotizing Eneterocolitis in Congenital Heart Disease
Pilot Randomized Control Trial of Necrotizing Enterocolitis Screening Using Abdominal Radiograph Versus Bowel Ultrasound Plus Abdominal Radiograph in Congenital Heart Disease Patients
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Children's Mercy Hospital
mi
from
Kansas City, MO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Assessment of TMAO Formation With Egg Intake Versus Choline Supplement in a Healthy Population
Assessment of TMAO Formation With Egg Intake Versus Choline Supplement in a Healthy Population
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Connecticut
mi
from
Storrs, CT
Assessment of TMAO Formation With Egg Intake Versus Choline Supplement in a Healthy Population
Assessment of TMAO Formation With Egg Intake Versus Choline Supplement in a Healthy Population
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Connecticut
mi
from
Storrs, CT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Effects of Choline From Eggs vs. Supplements on the Generation of TMAO in Humans
Effects of Choline From Eggs vs. Supplements on the Generation of TMAO in Humans (EGGS)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
Effects of Choline From Eggs vs. Supplements on the Generation of TMAO in Humans
Effects of Choline From Eggs vs. Supplements on the Generation of TMAO in Humans (EGGS)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Individual Variability to Aerobic Exercise Training
The Incidence of Training Responsiveness to Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Cardiometabolic Measurements Following Individualized and Standardized Exercise Prescription
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Western State Colorado University
mi
from
Gunnison, CO
Individual Variability to Aerobic Exercise Training
The Incidence of Training Responsiveness to Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Cardiometabolic Measurements Following Individualized and Standardized Exercise Prescription
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Western State Colorado University
mi
from
Gunnison, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Thomas Hospital
mi
from
Fairhope, AL
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Thomas Hospital
mi
from
Fairhope, AL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
The Vascular Experts
mi
from
Stratford, CT
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
The Vascular Experts
mi
from
Stratford, CT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Christiana Hospital
mi
from
Newark, DE
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Christiana Hospital
mi
from
Newark, DE
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
South Florida Vascular Institute
mi
from
Coconut Creek, FL
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
South Florida Vascular Institute
mi
from
Coconut Creek, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
North Florida Regional Medical Center
mi
from
Gainesville, FL
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
North Florida Regional Medical Center
mi
from
Gainesville, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Mount Sinai Medical Center
mi
from
Miami Beach, FL
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Mount Sinai Medical Center
mi
from
Miami Beach, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Florida Hospital
mi
from
Orlando, FL
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Florida Hospital
mi
from
Orlando, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Florida Hospital Heartland Medical Center
mi
from
Sebring, FL
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Florida Hospital Heartland Medical Center
mi
from
Sebring, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
mi
from
Honolulu, HI
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
mi
from
Honolulu, HI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
St. Joseph Hospital
mi
from
Fort Wayne, IN
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
St. Joseph Hospital
mi
from
Fort Wayne, IN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Community Hospital
mi
from
Munster, IN
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Community Hospital
mi
from
Munster, IN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
King's Daughters Medical Center- Kentucky Heart Institute
mi
from
Ashland, KY
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
King's Daughters Medical Center- Kentucky Heart Institute
mi
from
Ashland, KY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Terrebonne General Medical Center
mi
from
Houma, LA
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Terrebonne General Medical Center
mi
from
Houma, LA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Mercy Hospital
mi
from
Coon Rapids, MN
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Mercy Hospital
mi
from
Coon Rapids, MN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
United Heart and Vascular Clinic
mi
from
Saint Paul, MN
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
United Heart and Vascular Clinic
mi
from
Saint Paul, MN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Hackensack University Medical Center
mi
from
Hackensack, NJ
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Hackensack University Medical Center
mi
from
Hackensack, NJ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Mount Sinai Hospital
mi
from
New York, NY
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Mount Sinai Hospital
mi
from
New York, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Rex Hospital, Inc
mi
from
Raleigh, NC
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Rex Hospital, Inc
mi
from
Raleigh, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Coastal Carolina Surgical Associates
mi
from
Wilmington, NC
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Coastal Carolina Surgical Associates
mi
from
Wilmington, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
LakeWest Hospital
mi
from
Willoughby, OH
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
LakeWest Hospital
mi
from
Willoughby, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
St. Charles Medical Center
mi
from
Bend, OR
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
St. Charles Medical Center
mi
from
Bend, OR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University Medical Center-Greenville Memorial Hospital
mi
from
Greenville, SC
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University Medical Center-Greenville Memorial Hospital
mi
from
Greenville, SC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Turkey Creek Medical Center
mi
from
Knoxville, TN
RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGER™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Turkey Creek Medical Center
mi
from
Knoxville, TN
Click here to add this to my saved trials