Clinical Research Trials Archive – Closed Trials

This is our archive of closed clinical trials, which means that they are no longer accepting new participants or have been concluded. Once a research facility has chosen to close the study, it is sorted into the GPS archive by indication. If you are interested in enrolling in a clinical trial, then please browse our list of active clinical studies.

Zip code

Condition


Search Radius:25 Miles
  • 5
  • 10
  • 15
  • 20
  • 25
  • 30
  • 40
  • 50
  • 100
  • 500
  • All

We've found
15,843
archived clinical trials in
Prostate Cancer

Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
San Antonio, TX
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
San Antonio, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Salt Lake City, UT
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Salt Lake City, UT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Wheeling, WV
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Wheeling, WV
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Buenos Aires,
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
mi
from
Buenos Aires,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Santa Barbara, CA
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Santa Barbara, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Las Vegas, NV
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Las Vegas, NV
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Albany, NY
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Albany, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Salisbury, NC
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Salisbury, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Springfield, OR
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Springfield, OR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Tualatin, OR
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Tualatin, OR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Germantown, TN
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Germantown, TN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Spokane, WA
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Spokane, WA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Nashville, TN
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Nashville, TN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Washington,
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Washington,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Bronx, NY
Study of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (PROfound Study)
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Bronx, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Determine the Safety of BTP-114 for Treatment in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With BRCA Mutations
Escalation Study of BTP-114 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and BRCA or DNA Repair Mutation
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Sarasota, FL
A Study to Determine the Safety of BTP-114 for Treatment in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With BRCA Mutations
Escalation Study of BTP-114 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and BRCA or DNA Repair Mutation
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Placon Therapeutics Clinical Trial Site
mi
from
Sarasota, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Determine the Safety of BTP-114 for Treatment in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With BRCA Mutations
Escalation Study of BTP-114 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and BRCA or DNA Repair Mutation
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Boston, MA
A Study to Determine the Safety of BTP-114 for Treatment in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With BRCA Mutations
Escalation Study of BTP-114 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and BRCA or DNA Repair Mutation
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Placon Therapeutics Clinical Trial Site
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Determine the Safety of BTP-114 for Treatment in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With BRCA Mutations
Escalation Study of BTP-114 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and BRCA or DNA Repair Mutation
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
A Study to Determine the Safety of BTP-114 for Treatment in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With BRCA Mutations
Escalation Study of BTP-114 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and BRCA or DNA Repair Mutation
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Placon Therapeutics Clinical Trial Site
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Determine the Safety of BTP-114 for Treatment in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With BRCA Mutations
Escalation Study of BTP-114 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and BRCA or DNA Repair Mutation
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Oklahoma City, OK
A Study to Determine the Safety of BTP-114 for Treatment in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With BRCA Mutations
Escalation Study of BTP-114 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and BRCA or DNA Repair Mutation
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Placon Therapeutics Clinical Trial Site
mi
from
Oklahoma City, OK
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Determine the Safety of BTP-114 for Treatment in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With BRCA Mutations
Escalation Study of BTP-114 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and BRCA or DNA Repair Mutation
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Nashville, TN
A Study to Determine the Safety of BTP-114 for Treatment in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With BRCA Mutations
Escalation Study of BTP-114 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and BRCA or DNA Repair Mutation
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Placon Therapeutics Clinical Trial Site
mi
from
Nashville, TN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Determine the Safety of BTP-114 for Treatment in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With BRCA Mutations
Escalation Study of BTP-114 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and BRCA or DNA Repair Mutation
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Houston, TX
A Study to Determine the Safety of BTP-114 for Treatment in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With BRCA Mutations
Escalation Study of BTP-114 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and BRCA or DNA Repair Mutation
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Placon Therapeutics Clinical Trial Site
mi
from
Houston, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Determine the Safety of BTP-114 for Treatment in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With BRCA Mutations
Escalation Study of BTP-114 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and BRCA or DNA Repair Mutation
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
A Study to Determine the Safety of BTP-114 for Treatment in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With BRCA Mutations
Escalation Study of BTP-114 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and BRCA or DNA Repair Mutation
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Placon Therapeutics Clinical Trial Site
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety, Tolerability, and PK of GT0918 (Proxalutamide) in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Prostate Cancer
A Phase 1/2, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Two-Stage Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of GT0918 in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Las Vegas, NV
Safety, Tolerability, and PK of GT0918 (Proxalutamide) in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Prostate Cancer
A Phase 1/2, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Two-Stage Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of GT0918 in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
mi
from
Las Vegas, NV
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety, Tolerability, and PK of GT0918 (Proxalutamide) in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Prostate Cancer
A Phase 1/2, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Two-Stage Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of GT0918 in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
East Setauket, NY
Safety, Tolerability, and PK of GT0918 (Proxalutamide) in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Prostate Cancer
A Phase 1/2, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Two-Stage Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of GT0918 in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
North Shore Hematology Oncology Associates
mi
from
East Setauket, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety, Tolerability, and PK of GT0918 (Proxalutamide) in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Prostate Cancer
A Phase 1/2, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Two-Stage Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of GT0918 in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Canton, OH
Safety, Tolerability, and PK of GT0918 (Proxalutamide) in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Prostate Cancer
A Phase 1/2, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Two-Stage Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of GT0918 in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Gabrail Cancer Center Research LLC
mi
from
Canton, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety, Tolerability, and PK of GT0918 (Proxalutamide) in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Prostate Cancer
A Phase 1/2, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Two-Stage Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of GT0918 in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Towson, MD
Safety, Tolerability, and PK of GT0918 (Proxalutamide) in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Prostate Cancer
A Phase 1/2, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Two-Stage Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of GT0918 in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Chesapeake Urology Research Associates
mi
from
Towson, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety, Tolerability, and PK of GT0918 (Proxalutamide) in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Prostate Cancer
A Phase 1/2, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Two-Stage Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of GT0918 in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Omaha, NE
Safety, Tolerability, and PK of GT0918 (Proxalutamide) in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Prostate Cancer
A Phase 1/2, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Two-Stage Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of GT0918 in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
G U Research Network
mi
from
Omaha, NE
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety, Tolerability, and PK of GT0918 (Proxalutamide) in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Prostate Cancer
A Phase 1/2, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Two-Stage Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of GT0918 in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
New Brunswick, NJ
Safety, Tolerability, and PK of GT0918 (Proxalutamide) in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Prostate Cancer
A Phase 1/2, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Two-Stage Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of GT0918 in Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Rutgers University
mi
from
New Brunswick, NJ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Tucson, AZ
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Arizona Oncology - HOPE Wilmot
mi
from
Tucson, AZ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Denver, CO
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Colorado
mi
from
Denver, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
New Haven, CT
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Yale University
mi
from
New Haven, CT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Miami, FL
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Baptist Health Medical Group Oncology, LLC
mi
from
Miami, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Chicago, IL
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Chicago; Hematology/Oncology
mi
from
Chicago, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Kansas City, KA
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Kansas City - Menorah Medical Center
mi
from
Kansas City, KA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Columbia, MD
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Maryland Oncology Hematology PA
mi
from
Columbia, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Omaha, NE
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nebraska Methodist Hospital; Cancer Center
mi
from
Omaha, NE
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Albany, NY
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
New York Oncology Hematology PC
mi
from
Albany, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
New York, NY
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Columbia University Medical Center; Clinical Research Management Office
mi
from
New York, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Cincinnati, OH
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Onc/Hem Care Clin Trials LLC
mi
from
Cincinnati, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Chattanooga, TN
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
SCRI Tennessee Oncology Chattanooga
mi
from
Chattanooga, TN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Nashville, TN
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Sarah Cannon Research Inst
mi
from
Nashville, TN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Dallas, TX
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Texas Oncology - Baylor Sammons Cancer Center
mi
from
Dallas, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Norfolk, VA
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Virginia Oncology Associates - Lake Wright Cancer Center
mi
from
Norfolk, VA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Wilrijk,
A Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of MOXR0916 in Combination With Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Alone in Patients With Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Therapy
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
GasthuisZusters Antwerpen
mi
from
Wilrijk,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Assess Gamma H2AX Positivity in Circulating Prostate Cancer Cells Before and After Radium 223
Assess Gamma H2AX Positivity in Circulating Prostate Cancer Cells Before and After Radium 223 Treatment
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Tampa, FL
Assess Gamma H2AX Positivity in Circulating Prostate Cancer Cells Before and After Radium 223
Assess Gamma H2AX Positivity in Circulating Prostate Cancer Cells Before and After Radium 223 Treatment
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute
mi
from
Tampa, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
A Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Clermont-ferrand,
A Study to Evaluate Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
A Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Local Institution
mi
from
Clermont-ferrand,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
A Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Houston, TX
A Study to Evaluate Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
A Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
mi
from
Houston, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
A Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
A Study to Evaluate Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
A Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Washington University School of Medicine
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
A Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
New York, NY
A Study to Evaluate Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
A Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
mi
from
New York, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
A Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
A Study to Evaluate Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
A Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Univ of Pennsylvania
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials