Clinical Research Trials Archive – Closed Trials

This is our archive of closed clinical trials, which means that they are no longer accepting new participants or have been concluded. Once a research facility has chosen to close the study, it is sorted into the GPS archive by indication. If you are interested in enrolling in a clinical trial, then please browse our list of active clinical studies.

Zip code

Condition


Search Radius:25 Miles
  • 5
  • 10
  • 15
  • 20
  • 25
  • 30
  • 40
  • 50
  • 100
  • 500
  • All

We've found
8,265
archived clinical trials in
Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Albuquerque, NM
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Albuquerque Clinical Trials
mi
from
Albuquerque, NM
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Canton, NY
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Saint Lawrence Health System; Rheumatology
mi
from
Canton, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Corpus Christi, TX
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Adriana Pop-Moody MD - Clinic PA
mi
from
Corpus Christi, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Houston, TX
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Accurate Clinical Research
mi
from
Houston, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Covina, CA
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Medvin Clinical Research
mi
from
Covina, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Toms River, NJ
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Atlantic Coast Rheumatology
mi
from
Toms River, NJ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Albuquerque, NM
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Albuquerque Center For Rheumatology
mi
from
Albuquerque, NM
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Wexford, PA
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Advanced Rheumatology & Arthritis Research Center, P.C
mi
from
Wexford, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Charleston, SC
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Low Country Rheumatology
mi
from
Charleston, SC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Stafford, TX
A Study of RO7123520 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Moderately To Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Are Inadequately Responding to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase II Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of RO7123520 as Adjunct Treatment in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Accurate Clinical Research Inc.
mi
from
Stafford, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Anniston, AL
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Pinnacle Research Group; Llc, Central
mi
from
Anniston, AL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Glendale, AZ
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, PC
mi
from
Glendale, AZ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Covina, CA
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Medvin Clinical Research
mi
from
Covina, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
El Cajon, CA
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
TriWest Research Associates, LLC
mi
from
El Cajon, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Fullerton, CA
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Saint Jude Heritage Medical Grp
mi
from
Fullerton, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Stanford, CA
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Stanford University School of Medicine
mi
from
Stanford, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Boca Raton, FL
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
RASF Clinical Research Center
mi
from
Boca Raton, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Boynton Beach, FL
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Zasa Clinical Research
mi
from
Boynton Beach, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Clearwater, FL
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research of West Florida
mi
from
Clearwater, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Tampa, FL
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
McIlwain Medical Group
mi
from
Tampa, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Idaho Falls, ID
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Institute of Arthritis Research
mi
from
Idaho Falls, ID
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Meridian, ID
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Advanced Clinical Research, Inc.
mi
from
Meridian, ID
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Greensboro, NC
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Medication Management, LLC
mi
from
Greensboro, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Portland, OR
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Oregon Health and Science University
mi
from
Portland, OR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Wyomissing, PA
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Center of Reading, LLC
mi
from
Wyomissing, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Dallas, TX
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Metroplex Clinical Research
mi
from
Dallas, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Dallas, TX
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Baylor Research Inst.
mi
from
Dallas, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Houston, TX
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Accurate Clinical Management - VO
mi
from
Houston, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Houston, TX
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Accurate Clinical Research
mi
from
Houston, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Victoria, TX
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Crossroads Clinical Research, LLC
mi
from
Victoria, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Danville, VA
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Danville Orthopedic Clinic, Inc.; Research Department
mi
from
Danville, VA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Buenos Aires,
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Instituto de Investigaciones Clinicas-Mar del Plata
mi
from
Buenos Aires,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Miami, FL
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
InVentiv Health
mi
from
Miami, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Orlando, FL
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Omega Research Consultants, Llc
mi
from
Orlando, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Peoria, AZ
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
SunValley Arthritis Center, Lt /ID# 154558
mi
from
Peoria, AZ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Sun City, AZ
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZ Arthritis & Rheum Research /ID# 156539
mi
from
Sun City, AZ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Tucson, AZ
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
AZ Arth & Rheum Res /ID# 167161
mi
from
Tucson, AZ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Hot Springs, AR
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
CHI St. Vincent Medical Group /ID# 154561
mi
from
Hot Springs, AR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Fullerton, CA
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Saint Jude Heritage /ID# 158833
mi
from
Fullerton, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
La Mesa, CA
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Kotha and Kotha /ID# 154573
mi
from
La Mesa, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Denver, CO
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Denver Arthritis Clinic, PC /ID# 159195
mi
from
Denver, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Fort Collins, CO
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Arthritis and Rheum Clin N. CO /ID# 155673
mi
from
Fort Collins, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Lakewood, CO
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Scientia Medical Research /ID# 159189
mi
from
Lakewood, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Clearwater, FL
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Res of West FL, Inc. /ID# 154576
mi
from
Clearwater, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Ocoee, FL
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Advanced Clin Res of Orlando /ID# 154580
mi
from
Ocoee, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Pensacola, FL
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Gulf Region Clinical Res Inst /ID# 154597
mi
from
Pensacola, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Tamarac, FL
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
W. Broward Rheum Assoc Inc. /ID# 158835
mi
from
Tamarac, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Venice, FL
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Lovelace Scientific Resources, Inc. /ID# 154600
mi
from
Venice, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Decatur, GA
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Jefrey D. Lieberman, MD, P.C. /ID# 157178
mi
from
Decatur, GA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Meridian, ID
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Upadacitinib to Abatacept in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Dose of Conventional Synthetic Disease- Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) Who Have an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs ( SELECT-CHOICE )
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Abatacept in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on Stable Conventional Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Advanced Clinical Research /ID# 154603
mi
from
Meridian, ID
Click here to add this to my saved trials