Clinical Research Trials Archive – Closed Trials

This is our archive of closed clinical trials, which means that they are no longer accepting new participants or have been concluded. Once a research facility has chosen to close the study, it is sorted into the GPS archive by indication. If you are interested in enrolling in a clinical trial, then please browse our list of active clinical studies.

Zip code

Condition


Search Radius:25 Miles
  • 5
  • 10
  • 15
  • 20
  • 25
  • 30
  • 40
  • 50
  • 100
  • 500
  • All

We've found
11,674
archived clinical trials in
Skin Cancer

A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating AMG 232 in Metastatic Melanoma
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of AMG 232 Combined With Trametinib and Dabrafenib or Trametinib in Adult Subjects With Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating AMG 232 in Metastatic Melanoma
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of AMG 232 Combined With Trametinib and Dabrafenib or Trametinib in Adult Subjects With Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating AMG 232 in Metastatic Melanoma
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of AMG 232 Combined With Trametinib and Dabrafenib or Trametinib in Adult Subjects With Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Aurora, CO
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating AMG 232 in Metastatic Melanoma
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of AMG 232 Combined With Trametinib and Dabrafenib or Trametinib in Adult Subjects With Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Aurora, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating AMG 232 in Metastatic Melanoma
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of AMG 232 Combined With Trametinib and Dabrafenib or Trametinib in Adult Subjects With Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Boston, MA
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating AMG 232 in Metastatic Melanoma
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of AMG 232 Combined With Trametinib and Dabrafenib or Trametinib in Adult Subjects With Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating AMG 232 in Metastatic Melanoma
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of AMG 232 Combined With Trametinib and Dabrafenib or Trametinib in Adult Subjects With Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Chapel Hill, NC
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating AMG 232 in Metastatic Melanoma
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of AMG 232 Combined With Trametinib and Dabrafenib or Trametinib in Adult Subjects With Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Chapel Hill, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating AMG 232 in Metastatic Melanoma
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of AMG 232 Combined With Trametinib and Dabrafenib or Trametinib in Adult Subjects With Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Nashville, TN
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating AMG 232 in Metastatic Melanoma
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of AMG 232 Combined With Trametinib and Dabrafenib or Trametinib in Adult Subjects With Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Nashville, TN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating AMG 232 in Metastatic Melanoma
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of AMG 232 Combined With Trametinib and Dabrafenib or Trametinib in Adult Subjects With Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Research Site
mi
from
North Sydney,
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating AMG 232 in Metastatic Melanoma
A Phase 1b/2a Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of AMG 232 Combined With Trametinib and Dabrafenib or Trametinib in Adult Subjects With Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Research Site
mi
from
North Sydney,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
mi
from
Little Rock, AR
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
mi
from
Little Rock, AR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
mi
from
La Jolla, CA
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
mi
from
La Jolla, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
The Angeles Clinic & Research Institute
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
The Angeles Clinic & Research Institute
mi
from
Los Angeles, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Baptist Cancer Institute
mi
from
Jacksonville, FL
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Baptist Cancer Institute
mi
from
Jacksonville, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center
mi
from
Miami Beach, FL
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center
mi
from
Miami Beach, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Orlando Health
mi
from
Orlando, FL
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Orlando Health
mi
from
Orlando, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute
mi
from
Tampa, FL
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute
mi
from
Tampa, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
mi
from
Boston, MA
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Allina Health
mi
from
Fridley, MN
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Allina Health
mi
from
Fridley, MN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
mi
from
New Brunswick, NJ
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
mi
from
New Brunswick, NJ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Oregon Health and Science University
mi
from
Portland, OR
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Oregon Health and Science University
mi
from
Portland, OR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
St. Luke'S Cancer Center - Anderson Campus
mi
from
Easton, PA
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
St. Luke'S Cancer Center - Anderson Campus
mi
from
Easton, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Virginia Health System
mi
from
Charlottesville, VA
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Virginia Health System
mi
from
Charlottesville, VA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Colorado Cancer Center
mi
from
Aurora, CO
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Colorado Cancer Center
mi
from
Aurora, CO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
mi
from
New York, NY
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
mi
from
New York, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Local Institution
mi
from
Capital Federal,
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Local Institution
mi
from
Capital Federal,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Winship Cancer Institute
mi
from
Atlanta, GA
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Winship Cancer Institute
mi
from
Atlanta, GA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute
mi
from
San Francisco, CA
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute
mi
from
San Francisco, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center
mi
from
San Francisco, CA
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center
mi
from
San Francisco, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Chicago
mi
from
Chicago, IL
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Chicago
mi
from
Chicago, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC)
mi
from
Boston, MA
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC)
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Massachusetts General Hospital
mi
from
Boston, MA
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Massachusetts General Hospital
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Michigan Health System
mi
from
Ann Arbor, MI
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Michigan Health System
mi
from
Ann Arbor, MI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Washington University School of Medicine
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Washington University School of Medicine
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
The Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center
mi
from
Hackensack, NJ
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
The Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center
mi
from
Hackensack, NJ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Nyu Clinical Cancer Institute
mi
from
New York, NY
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Nyu Clinical Cancer Institute
mi
from
New York, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Carolinas Healthcare System / Carolinas Medical Center
mi
from
Charlotte, NC
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Carolinas Healthcare System / Carolinas Medical Center
mi
from
Charlotte, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Duke Cancer Center
mi
from
Durham, NC
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Duke Cancer Center
mi
from
Durham, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Ohio State University
mi
from
Columbus, OH
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Ohio State University
mi
from
Columbus, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Providence Cancer Center Oncology and Hematology Care
mi
from
Portland, OR
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Providence Cancer Center Oncology and Hematology Care
mi
from
Portland, OR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Lehigh Valley Hospital
mi
from
Allentown, PA
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Lehigh Valley Hospital
mi
from
Allentown, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Medical University of South Carolina Hollings Cancer Center
mi
from
Charleston, SC
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Medical University of South Carolina Hollings Cancer Center
mi
from
Charleston, SC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Sarah Cannon Research Institute
mi
from
Nashville, TN
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Sarah Cannon Research Institute
mi
from
Nashville, TN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Texas Oncology Sammons Cancer Center
mi
from
Dallas, TX
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Texas Oncology Sammons Cancer Center
mi
from
Dallas, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University Of Washington Cancer Care Alliance
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University Of Washington Cancer Care Alliance
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
mi
from
Washington,
Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 238)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma in Subjects Who Are at High Risk for Recurrence (CheckMate 238: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 238)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
mi
from
Washington,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Phase I/II Study of PDR001 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Open Label Multicenter Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of PDR001 Administered to Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital Johns Hopkins
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Phase I/II Study of PDR001 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Open Label Multicenter Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of PDR001 Administered to Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital Johns Hopkins
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Phase I/II Study of PDR001 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Open Label Multicenter Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of PDR001 Administered to Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Massachusetts General Hospital
mi
from
Boston, MA
Phase I/II Study of PDR001 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Open Label Multicenter Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of PDR001 Administered to Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Massachusetts General Hospital
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Phase I/II Study of PDR001 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Open Label Multicenter Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of PDR001 Administered to Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Huntsman Cancer Institute Univ. of Utah HCI
mi
from
Salt Lake City, UT
Phase I/II Study of PDR001 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Open Label Multicenter Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of PDR001 Administered to Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Huntsman Cancer Institute Univ. of Utah HCI
mi
from
Salt Lake City, UT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Phase I/II Study of PDR001 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Open Label Multicenter Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of PDR001 Administered to Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Novartis Investigative Site
mi
from
Toronto,
Phase I/II Study of PDR001 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Open Label Multicenter Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of PDR001 Administered to Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Novartis Investigative Site
mi
from
Toronto,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Phase I/II Study of PDR001 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Open Label Multicenter Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of PDR001 Administered to Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Novartis
mi
from
Portland, OR
Phase I/II Study of PDR001 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Open Label Multicenter Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of PDR001 Administered to Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Novartis
mi
from
Portland, OR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Phase I/II Study of PDR001 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Open Label Multicenter Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of PDR001 Administered to Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Novartis Investigative Site
mi
from
Nashville, TN
Phase I/II Study of PDR001 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Open Label Multicenter Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of PDR001 Administered to Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Novartis Investigative Site
mi
from
Nashville, TN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Phase I/II Study of PDR001 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Open Label Multicenter Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of PDR001 Administered to Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Novartis Investigative Site
mi
from
Houston, TX
Phase I/II Study of PDR001 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Open Label Multicenter Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of PDR001 Administered to Patients With Advanced Malignancies
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Novartis Investigative Site
mi
from
Houston, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
PV-10 vs Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma
PV-10 Intralesional Injection vs Systemic Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Sharp Memorial Hospital - Clinical Oncology Research
mi
from
San Diego, CA
PV-10 vs Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma
PV-10 Intralesional Injection vs Systemic Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Sharp Memorial Hospital - Clinical Oncology Research
mi
from
San Diego, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials