Clinical Research Trials Archive – Closed Trials

This is our archive of closed clinical trials, which means that they are no longer accepting new participants or have been concluded. Once a research facility has chosen to close the study, it is sorted into the GPS archive by indication. If you are interested in enrolling in a clinical trial, then please browse our list of active clinical studies.

Zip code

Condition


Search Radius:25 Miles
  • 5
  • 10
  • 15
  • 20
  • 25
  • 30
  • 40
  • 50
  • 100
  • 500
  • All

We've found
1,578
archived clinical trials in
Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Lebanon, NH
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Lebanon, NH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Hackensack, NJ
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Hackensack, NJ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
East Setauket, NY
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
East Setauket, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
New York, NY
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
New York, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Chapel Hill, NC
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Chapel Hill, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Cincinnati, OH
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Cincinnati, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Charleston, SC
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Charleston, SC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Austin, TX
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Austin, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
San Antonio, TX
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
San Antonio, TX
Click here to add this to my saved trials
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Seattle, WA
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Seattle, WA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Research Site
mi
from
Kogarah,
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Research Site
mi
from
Kogarah,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Alabama at Birmingham
mi
from
Birmingham, AL
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Alabama at Birmingham
mi
from
Birmingham, AL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University of Arizona Medical Research Office
mi
from
Tucson, AZ
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University of Arizona Medical Research Office
mi
from
Tucson, AZ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
UC Davis Department of Dermatology
mi
from
Sacramento, CA
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
UC Davis Department of Dermatology
mi
from
Sacramento, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Univ of Calif, San Francisco
mi
from
San Francisco, CA
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Univ of Calif, San Francisco
mi
from
San Francisco, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute
mi
from
Torrance, CA
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute
mi
from
Torrance, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Northwestern University
mi
from
Chicago, IL
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Northwestern University
mi
from
Chicago, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Massachusetts General Hospital Dermatology
mi
from
Boston, MA
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Massachusetts General Hospital Dermatology
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Univ of Minnesota
mi
from
Minneapolis, MN
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Univ of Minnesota
mi
from
Minneapolis, MN
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
St. Louis University Hospital
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
St. Louis University Hospital
mi
from
Saint Louis, MO
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Uni of NY and Roswell Cancer
mi
from
Buffalo, NY
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Uni of NY and Roswell Cancer
mi
from
Buffalo, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
mi
from
New York, NY
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
mi
from
New York, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Wake Forest Baptist Hospital Center for Dermatology Research
mi
from
Winston-Salem, NC
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Wake Forest Baptist Hospital Center for Dermatology Research
mi
from
Winston-Salem, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Cleveland Clinic
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Cleveland Clinic
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Oregon Health Sciences Uni
mi
from
Portland, OR
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Oregon Health Sciences Uni
mi
from
Portland, OR
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Penn University
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Penn University
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Hospital Italiano
mi
from
Buenos Aires,
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Participants With Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus MMF in Patients With Pemphigus Vulgaris
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Hospital Italiano
mi
from
Buenos Aires,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin (Hizentra) in Patients With Dermatomyositis: A Proof of Concept Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Thomas Jefferson University
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin (Hizentra) in Patients With Dermatomyositis: A Proof of Concept Study
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Thomas Jefferson University
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Mobile, AL
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Mobile, AL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Chula Vista, CA
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Chula Vista, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
La Mesa, CA
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
La Mesa, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Oceanside, CA
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Oceanside, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Santa Ana, CA
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Santa Ana, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Santa Ana, CA
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Santa Ana, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Stockton, CA
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Stockton, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Miami, FL
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Miami, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
West Palm Beach, FL
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
West Palm Beach, FL
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Augusta, GA
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Augusta, GA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Columbus, GA
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Columbus, GA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Springfield, MA
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Springfield, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Detroit, MI
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Detroit, MI
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Butte, MT
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Butte, MT
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Las Vegas, NV
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Las Vegas, NV
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Somers Point, NJ
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Somers Point, NJ
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Rapid City, SD
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Rapid City, SD
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
mi
from
Pleven,
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
mi
from
Pleven,
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Buffalo, NY
Omadacycline Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI (EudraCT #2013-003644-23)
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Linezolid IV/PO for Treating Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
Clinical Research Facility
mi
from
Buffalo, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Sleep, Circadian Rhythm & Skin Health
Sleep, Circadian Rhythm & Skin Health
Status: Enrolling
Updated:  12/31/1969
University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
Sleep, Circadian Rhythm & Skin Health
Sleep, Circadian Rhythm & Skin Health
Status: Enrolling
Updated: 12/31/1969
University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center
mi
from
Cleveland, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials