Restoration of Leg Length, Offset, and Center of Rotation in Total Hip Replacement



Status:Completed
Conditions:Arthritis
Therapuetic Areas:Rheumatology
Healthy:No
Age Range:18 - Any
Updated:4/2/2016
Start Date:June 2007
End Date:April 2010
Contact:William Kurtz, MD
Email:kurtzwb@tnortho.com
Phone:615-963-1437

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

The investigators aim to demonstrate the ability to accurately measure and restore leg
length, offset, and center of rotation during a total hip replacement through a new
technique that uses the femoral component as a measurement tool. The operative technique
requires inserting the femoral component prior to performing the femoral neck osteotomy.
After the femoral component is implanted, a reference guide is attached to the femoral
component and guides a screw into the ilium at a fixed distance from the femoral component.
The pre-arthroplasty measurements of leg length and offset are recorded. The femoral neck
osteotomy is performed, and the native femoral head is removed and measured. The acetabular
socket is prepared and the acetabular component is inserted. A repeat measurement with trial
modular neck components is taken and allows the surgeon an additional opportunity to
accurately recreate leg length and offset with the final component. The reference screw is
removed from the ilium and the incision is closed.

Background:

Leg length inequality following total hip replacement is the leading cause of patient
dissatisfaction and subsequent litigation after total hip replacement. A change in the total
offset of the hip (lateral translation of the femur relative to the pelvis) may also cause
significant discomfort and hip instability. Before surgery, patients are informed that their
leg may be lengthened and a shoe lift may be required in the opposite shoe to equalize the
leg lengths. Although much less frequent, the leg can accidentally be shortened following
total hip replacement. In one recent study, 62% of patients had a mean leg lengthening of 9
mm and one third of these patients complained about this lengthening.

Limb length inequality can occur for two reasons. First, significant inaccuracies exist in
current leg length measurement techniques. Second, the surgeon may deliberately lengthen a
patient in order to gain hip stability. Increasing leg length and/or hip offset decreases
the occurrence of bony impingement and increases myofascial tension, both of which improve
hip stability and prevent hip dislocation.

Current methods of determining leg length and offset during surgery include pre-operative
templating, intra-operative measurements, intra-operative x-rays, and computer navigated
surgery. From the pre-operative x-rays, surgeons typically determine which size implant will
best fit the patient's anatomy and best recreate the same leg length. During surgery,
surgeons may attempt to palpate both the operative and the contra-lateral knee and/or ankle
to estimate leg lengths. Surgeons may measure the length of the femoral head and neck that
were removed and the length of the femoral head and neck that were replaced. Surgeons may
insert a long pin into the pelvis (typically the ilium bone) and measure the length from
this pin to some reference point on the femur. This pin in the pelvis method is probably
considered the most accurate, but the leg must be repositioned in exactly the same position
for the measurement to be accurate; 5° of hip abduction results in an 8 mm error in leg
length.3 An intra-operative x-ray that shows both hips can also help estimate leg length and
hip offset. Surgical navigation can determine leg length but is not widely availability and
requires a significant financial commitment by an institution. Surgeons typically determine
the appropriate amount of hip offset from their pre-operative templating. Current leg length
guides have shown even greater errors in their attempts to measure hip offset.

Hypothesis:

We aim to demonstrate the ability to accurately measure and restore leg length, offset, and
center of rotation during a total hip replacement through a new technique that uses the
femoral component as a measurement tool. We plan to evaluate the clinical outcome of this
procedure and compare it to historical controls.

Goals:

Our primary goal of this research study is to accurately measure and restore the leg length
during a hip replacement. Our second goal is to accurately measure and restore the hip
offset.

Endpoints:

Patients will be evaluated in clinic at 2 weeks, 3 months, one year, two year, five years
and every 5 years afterwards. The leg length, offset and center of rotation will be measured
on the pre and post-operative x-ray. Questionnaires based on validated clinical outcomes
scores will be completed at the pre-operative visit, at 3 months, one year, two years, five
years and every 5 years afterwards.

Abbreviated Methods:

Patients who consent for enrollment in this study will have a standard pre-operative and
post-operative AP pelvic x-ray, and leg length, offset measurements, and center of rotation
measurements will be made from these two radiographs. In addition, intra-operative
fluoroscopic radiographs will also be obtained. Validated questionnaire (Harris Hip Scores)
will be administered pre-operatively, at 3 months, at one year, and at two years.

The operative technique for measuring leg length requires inserting the femoral component
prior to performing the femoral neck osteotomy. After the femoral component is implanted, a
reference guide is attached to the femoral component and guides a screw into the ilium at a
fixed distance from the femoral component. The first measurements of leg length and offset
are recorded. The reference guide is removed from the femoral component and the femoral neck
osteotomy is performed. The native femoral head is removed and measured. The acetabulum is
prepared and the acetabular component is inserted. A repeat measurement with trial
components in place allows the surgeon an additional opportunity to accurately recreate leg
length and offset with the final component. After the final components are inserted, the
reference screw is removed from the ilium and the incision is closed. All total hips in this
study will be performed through a superior approach so that the anterior and posterior
capsules are preserved and hip stability is maximized. This capsular tissue preservation
approach will prevent or at least limit the need to deliberately lengthen the leg in order
to gain hip stability.

Inclusion Criteria:

- Hip arthritis requiring a total hip replacement through a superior approach

Exclusion Criteria:

- Non-english speaking

- Need for a cemented femoral stem

- Acute femoral neck fracture
We found this trial at
1
site
Nashville, Tennessee 37203
?
mi
from
Nashville, TN
Click here to add this to my saved trials