Differentiating Recurrent Brain Tumor Versus Radiation Injury Using MRI



Status:Completed
Conditions:Other Indications, Brain Cancer, Hospital
Therapuetic Areas:Oncology, Other
Healthy:No
Age Range:18 - Any
Updated:12/24/2017
Start Date:September 2008
End Date:June 1, 2015

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

Prospective Study Differentiating Recurrent Brain Tumor Versus Radiation Injury Using Magnetic Resonance (MR) Spectroscopy, Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Diffusion Weighted Imaging on 3T(Tesla) MR Scanner

The purpose of this study is to determine if certain MRI imaging sequences (pictures) are
more helpful to the physicians in determining if a brain tumor has recurred or if the person
has radiation injury following their treatment.

After a patient has been treated for a brain tumor by radiation the area of the brain that
has been treated changes in appearance. These changes in appearance can make it hard to
determine if a brain tumor has come back at the same site or if it is radiation injury. The
purpose of this study is to determine if certain MRI imaging sequences (pictures) are more
helpful to the physicians in determining if the tumor has come back or if it is radiation
injury.

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients previously treated with radiation therapy (including radiosurgery), with or
without previous surgery or chemotherapy, with a new contrast enhancing lesion(s) with
the size of 1 cm or more on conventional brain MRI examination are eligible

- Patients must have a previously histological confirmed brain tumor

- Patients must be 18 years of age or older

- Patients must sign a study-specific consent form approved by the Institutional Review
Board of the University of Michigan indicating prior to study entry

Exclusion Criteria:

- Pregnant woman

- For the purpose of this radiological study and in collecting data from the patient but
not from receiving the MR Spectroscopy if it is clinically indicated.

- Patients unable to undergo MRI imaging because of non-compatible devices such as
cardiac pacemakers, other implanted electronic devices, or foreign body in the eye

- Also patients with metallic prostheses, or ferromagnetic prostheses (e.g. pins in
artificial joints and surgical pins/clips in the face or skull region), or patients
with braces since these devices may cause metal artifacts which may obscure the images
and result in artifacts on the MR spectroscopy.

- Prisoners
We found this trial at
1
site
500 S State St
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
(734) 764-1817
University of Michigan The University of Michigan was founded in 1817 as one of the...
?
mi
from
Ann Arbor, MI
Click here to add this to my saved trials