Comparison Study of Biofoam Porous Metal Versus Allograft to Treat Adult Acquired Flatfoot



Status:Archived
Conditions:Orthopedic
Therapuetic Areas:Orthopedics / Podiatry
Healthy:No
Age Range:Any
Updated:7/1/2011
Start Date:March 2009

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Trial for Lateral Column Lengthening in Adult Acquired Flatfoot Using Biofoam Porous Metal Compared With Allograft


The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a
randomized, consecutive series of adult patients, with an acquired flatfoot, treated with a
lateral column lengthening using an allograft bone wedge versus a titanium porous metal
implant (Biofoam, Wright Medical).

Null hypothesis: At six months postoperatively, there is no difference in the degree of
correction as measured by the talonavicular coverage angle between patients randomized to
allograft and Biofoam.

Alternative hypothesis: At six months postoperatively, the degree of correction as measured
by the talonavicular coverage angle will be less in patients randomized to allograft than
the degree of correction in patients randomized to Biofoam.



We found this trial at
1
site
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
?
mi
from
Charlotte, NC
Click here to add this to my saved trials