Randomized Investigation of Chest Pain Diagnostic Strategies
Status: | Completed |
---|---|
Conditions: | Angina, Cardiology |
Therapuetic Areas: | Cardiology / Vascular Diseases |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 21 - Any |
Updated: | 9/12/2018 |
Start Date: | January 2010 |
End Date: | August 2012 |
Clinical decision units (CDUs) improve resource utilization and are a recommended care option
by the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association, but are underutilized in
non-low risk chest pain patients due to weaknesses of traditional cardiac testing. Cardiac
magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is sensitive and specific for ischemia, can simultaneously
assess cardiac function and myocardial perfusion, and could revolutionize the diagnostic
process for intermediate risk patients with chest pain. The primary objective of this trial
is to measure the efficiency and safety of a combined CDU-CMR care pathway compared to
inpatient care among patients with non-low risk acute chest pain.
by the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association, but are underutilized in
non-low risk chest pain patients due to weaknesses of traditional cardiac testing. Cardiac
magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is sensitive and specific for ischemia, can simultaneously
assess cardiac function and myocardial perfusion, and could revolutionize the diagnostic
process for intermediate risk patients with chest pain. The primary objective of this trial
is to measure the efficiency and safety of a combined CDU-CMR care pathway compared to
inpatient care among patients with non-low risk acute chest pain.
Despite spending $12 billion annually on the emergency evaluation of chest pain in the US,
only 15% of admitted patients have a cardiac cause of their presenting symptoms. Clinical
decision units (CDUs) improve resource utilization and are a recommended care option by the
American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association, but are underutilized in non-low
risk chest pain patients due to weaknesses of traditional cardiac testing. Cardiac magnetic
resonance imaging (CMR) is sensitive and specific for ischemia, can simultaneously assess
cardiac function and myocardial perfusion, and could revolutionize the diagnostic process for
intermediate risk patients with chest pain. The superior accuracy of CMR could decrease
testing and invasive procedures. The high sensitivity for ongoing ischemia could allow
imaging in parallel with cardiac markers. As a result, CMR could improve the care of
emergency department (ED) patients with intermediate risk chest pain. However, the efficiency
and safety of CMR has not been extensively tested in the CDU setting.
Primary Hypothesis: A CDU-CMR strategy will reduce the occurrence of the composite of
revascularization, re-hospitalization, and recurrent cardiac testing at 90 days when compared
to an inpatient care strategy.
Methods: Participants (n=146) at intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) will be
recruited into a clinical trial from Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center (WFUBMC)
ED. Participants will be equally randomized to CDU-CMR or inpatient care. CDU-CMR
participants will undergo resting and stress CMR imaging in parallel with serial cardiac
markers. Inpatient care participants will undergo serial cardiac markers followed by existing
cardiac testing as determined by their care providers. The primary outcome is the composite
of 90 day revascularization, re-hospitalization, and recurrent cardiac testing. The secondary
outcome is index hospitalization length of stay. Safety events include ACS after discharge,
mortality, and stress testing-related adverse events.
only 15% of admitted patients have a cardiac cause of their presenting symptoms. Clinical
decision units (CDUs) improve resource utilization and are a recommended care option by the
American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association, but are underutilized in non-low
risk chest pain patients due to weaknesses of traditional cardiac testing. Cardiac magnetic
resonance imaging (CMR) is sensitive and specific for ischemia, can simultaneously assess
cardiac function and myocardial perfusion, and could revolutionize the diagnostic process for
intermediate risk patients with chest pain. The superior accuracy of CMR could decrease
testing and invasive procedures. The high sensitivity for ongoing ischemia could allow
imaging in parallel with cardiac markers. As a result, CMR could improve the care of
emergency department (ED) patients with intermediate risk chest pain. However, the efficiency
and safety of CMR has not been extensively tested in the CDU setting.
Primary Hypothesis: A CDU-CMR strategy will reduce the occurrence of the composite of
revascularization, re-hospitalization, and recurrent cardiac testing at 90 days when compared
to an inpatient care strategy.
Methods: Participants (n=146) at intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) will be
recruited into a clinical trial from Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center (WFUBMC)
ED. Participants will be equally randomized to CDU-CMR or inpatient care. CDU-CMR
participants will undergo resting and stress CMR imaging in parallel with serial cardiac
markers. Inpatient care participants will undergo serial cardiac markers followed by existing
cardiac testing as determined by their care providers. The primary outcome is the composite
of 90 day revascularization, re-hospitalization, and recurrent cardiac testing. The secondary
outcome is index hospitalization length of stay. Safety events include ACS after discharge,
mortality, and stress testing-related adverse events.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age greater than or equal to 21 years of age at the time of enrollment
- Chest discomfort or other symptoms consistent with possible ACS as indicated by the
treating physician after obtaining an ECG and cardiac biomarkers for the patient's
evaluation
- Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score >/= 2 or physician impression
of intermediate or high likelihood symptoms represent ACS
- Patient requires an inpatient or CDU evaluation for their chest pain
- The treating physician feels the patient could be discharged home if cardiac disease
was excluded
- The treating physician feels the patient is safe for CDU care
Pretest probability assessment The assessment of intermediate risk for developing ACS will
be based on a TIMI risk score >/= 2 and / or a board certified / board eligible emergency
physician clinical impression of intermediate or high likelihood that the symptoms
represent ACS. Physicians are encouraged to use the 2007 American College of Cardiology
(ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines as a framework for this assessment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Elevated cardiac biomarkers
- New ST-segment elevation on any electrocardiogram (>/= 1 mV)
- New ST-segment depression on any electrocardiogram (>/= 2 mV)
- Known inducible cardiac ischemia without subsequent revascularization
- Unable to lie flat
- Symptomatic hypotension at the time of enrollment (systolic < 90 mm Hg)
- Contra-indications to MRI (examples: Pacemaker, defibrillator, cerebral aneurysm
clips, metallic ocular foreign body, implanted devices, severe claustrophobia)
- Patient refusal or inability to comply with medical record review and follow up
- Terminal diagnosis with life expectancy less than 3 months
- Currently Pregnant
- Creatinine clearance < 45 ml/min at the time of enrollment or clinical concern for
acute kidney injury
- Chronic liver disease with a creatinine clearance of <60 ml/min at the time of
enrollment
- Hepato-renal syndrome
- History of liver, heart, or kidney transplant
- Confirmed angioplasty, stent placement, or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
within the last 6 months
We found this trial at
1
site
1 Medical Center Blvd
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103
(336) 716-2011
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center Welcome to Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, a fully...
Click here to add this to my saved trials