Assessing Arrhythmias After Ablation Using Implantable Recorders



Status:Completed
Conditions:Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiology
Therapuetic Areas:Cardiology / Vascular Diseases
Healthy:No
Age Range:18 - Any
Updated:4/17/2018
Start Date:June 2012
End Date:January 2013

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

Assessment of Arrhythmia Burden in Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Using an Implantable Loop Recorder (ILR) Versus Conventional Monitoring Strategy

The purpose of this study is to determine if continuous monitoring using an implantable loop
recorder (ie. a device that is placed just underneath the skin of the chest and monitors the
heart rate and rhythm) for a year long period after atrial fibrillation ablation may be
superior to the current conventional monitoring strategy used by us for determination of
atrial fibrillation recurrence (ie. return of the abnormal heart rhythm) and/or arrythmia
burden (ie. how long the abnormal rhythm continues or how often the rhythm occurs). Some data
suggests that continuous monitoring over longer periods may be better in identifying
recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation and thus assist in its overall management.
The device being used for this study is the Reveal XT, which, is currently FDA approved for
monitoring all varieties of cardiac rhythm disorders including atrial fibrillation.


Inclusion Criteria:

- Greater than 18 years

- Undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation at the University of Pennsylvania

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients with already implanted devices, including pacemakers, implantable cardiac
defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization devices
We found this trial at
1
site
3451 Walnut St
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
1 (215) 898-5000
Univ of Pennsylvania Penn has a long and proud tradition of intellectual rigor and pursuit...
?
mi
from
Philadelphia, PA
Click here to add this to my saved trials