Safety and Efficacy of the TransDiscal System Versus Medical Management in Treating Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain
Status: | Completed |
---|---|
Conditions: | Back Pain |
Therapuetic Areas: | Musculoskeletal |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 21 - Any |
Updated: | 7/12/2018 |
Start Date: | December 2010 |
End Date: | April 2015 |
A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center, Open-Label Clinical Trial Comparing Disc Biacuplasty With Medical Management for Discogenic Lumbar Back Pain
The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the safety and
efficacy of the TransDiscal System (TDS) in treating discogenic pain of the lumbar spine
using a modified disc biacuplasty procedure. The primary efficacy measure will be the Visual
Analog Scale (VAS) at 6 months post treatment/randomization and the TransDiscal System will
be compared against medical management (standard of care).
efficacy of the TransDiscal System (TDS) in treating discogenic pain of the lumbar spine
using a modified disc biacuplasty procedure. The primary efficacy measure will be the Visual
Analog Scale (VAS) at 6 months post treatment/randomization and the TransDiscal System will
be compared against medical management (standard of care).
The intervertebral discs serve as joints between the vertebral bodies, providing both
structural support and flexibility to the spinal column. Intervertebral discs do not remain
structurally intact over a lifetime and degenerate as a natural part of aging. Degenerated
discs do not react to stresses and forces the same as healthy discs. When too much stress is
applied to a degenerated disc, tears can result. Evidence suggests that when a tear is
present, sensory nerve endings can grow into the tear and transmit pain.
The TransDiscal System (TDS) is a medical device that is used in a procedure called Disc
Biacuplasty and is currently available in the United States and throughout the world. The TDS
enables the back of the disc to be heated to high enough temperatures to ablate the nerves
inside that are transmitting pain, while maintaining low enough temperatures to prevent
damage to surrounding tissues. The TDS uses two electrodes, located at the ends of two thin
probes, which are placed on both sides of the back of the intervertebral disc by inserting
them through the skin into the disc using x-ray guidance. Radiofrequency (RF) current flows
in the disc between the two electrodes, heating the tissue in the disc to the desired
temperature. The study evaluates a modified heating protocol than what is currently in
clinical use which should allow for a larger area of the back of the disc to be heated.
structural support and flexibility to the spinal column. Intervertebral discs do not remain
structurally intact over a lifetime and degenerate as a natural part of aging. Degenerated
discs do not react to stresses and forces the same as healthy discs. When too much stress is
applied to a degenerated disc, tears can result. Evidence suggests that when a tear is
present, sensory nerve endings can grow into the tear and transmit pain.
The TransDiscal System (TDS) is a medical device that is used in a procedure called Disc
Biacuplasty and is currently available in the United States and throughout the world. The TDS
enables the back of the disc to be heated to high enough temperatures to ablate the nerves
inside that are transmitting pain, while maintaining low enough temperatures to prevent
damage to surrounding tissues. The TDS uses two electrodes, located at the ends of two thin
probes, which are placed on both sides of the back of the intervertebral disc by inserting
them through the skin into the disc using x-ray guidance. Radiofrequency (RF) current flows
in the disc between the two electrodes, heating the tissue in the disc to the desired
temperature. The study evaluates a modified heating protocol than what is currently in
clinical use which should allow for a larger area of the back of the disc to be heated.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥21 years
- Able to understand the informed consent and able to complete outcome measures
- Objective measurements indicating functional impairment related to low back pain
- Stabilized on pain medication regimen for >2 months as defined by a <10% change in
dosage
- History of chronic low back pain (>6 months) unresponsive to non-operative care
(including physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medication, epidurals, diagnostic facet
joint/medial branch blocks, and sacroiliac joint interventions as performed or deemed
appropriate by the Investigator)
- Score ≥5 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) relating specifically to the average daily
low back pain
- Back pain more prominent than leg pain which is commonly exacerbated by flexion or
bending or prolonged sitting.
- Single level concordant pain reproduction present on lumbar discography in desiccated
disc. Magnetic resonance Imaging (MRI) image also supports discography findings.
Changes in other disc spaces in the lumbar region do not demonstrate neural
compressive lesion.
- Disc height at least 50% of adjacent control disc
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of compressive radiculopathy with predominant leg pain
- Evidence of nucleus pulposus herniation or free disc fragments on MRI
- Evidence of > 2 discs dessicated based on MRI or symptomatic involvement of more than
one lumbar disc levels.
- Asymptomatic disc bulges > 5 mm at the treatment level.
- Prior lumbar surgery of any kind at the treatment level (micro-discectomies, and/or
minimally invasive procedures at other levels that are not excluded)
- Prior spinal fusion below the T10 Level
- Symptoms or signs of lumbar canal stenosis at any level
- Evidence of structural abnormality at the lumbar level (except non-symptomatic
spondylolysis resulting in spondylolithesis no more than Grade 1 upon flexion and
extension)
- Any generalized pain or multifocal pain,conversion or multiple non-anatomical
complaints
- Pending or active compensation claim, litigation or disability income remuneration
(secondary gain)
- Chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial dysfunction
- Beck's Depression Index (BDI) score >20
- Current pregnancy, recent delivery (within 3 months of consent) or the intent of
becoming pregnant during the study period.
- Systemic or localized infection at the anticipated needle entry site (subject may be
considered for inclusion once infection is resolved)
- Discitis
- Allergies to any medication to be used in the procedure
- Present symptomatic lumbar spinal fracture
- History of uncontrolled coagulopathy, ongoing coagulation treatment or unexplained or
uncontrollable bleeding that is uncorrectable
- Progressive neurological deficits
- Within the preceding 2 years, subject has suffered from active narcotic addiction,
substance abuse or alcohol abuse
- Current prescribed opioid medications equivalent to >120 mg of morphine per 24 hours
- Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g. Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome [AIDS],
cancer, diabetes, etc.)
- Body Mass Index (BMI) >32.5 kg/m^2
- Participating in another clinical trial/investigation 30 days prior to signing
informed consent
- Negative or indeterminate lumbar discography results as assessed per International
Spine Intervention Society (ISIS) guidelines
- Subject unwilling or unable to comply with follow up schedule or protocol
requirements.
We found this trial at
9
sites
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Clinic is committed to principles as presented in the United Nations Global...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Compass Research LLC Compass Research is a clinical research company dedicated to testing new medications...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials