Shared Decision-Making for Colorectal Cancer Screening



Status:Completed
Conditions:Colorectal Cancer, Cancer
Therapuetic Areas:Oncology
Healthy:No
Age Range:50 - 75
Updated:11/30/2013
Start Date:January 2005
End Date:September 2005
Contact:Julie Glick, BA, MPH
Email:julie.glick@bmc.org
Phone:617-638-8348

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!


The overall objective of this study is to conduct a three-arm randomized controlled trial to
evaluate the impact of an interactive, web-based decision aid on shared decision-making and
patient adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations.


Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death and third most
commonly diagnosed cancer among men and women in the United States. Screening has been shown
to be a cost-effective strategy for reducing both CRC mortality through early detection and
incidence through the detection and removal of precancerous adenomatous polyps (adenomas).
Despite a compelling rationale and widespread endorsement by authoritative groups, screening
rates remain far below those necessary to achieve significant reductions in CRC mortality or
incidence. Poor patient acceptance and non-adherence to screening recommendations are partly
responsible for low screening rates. Shared decision-making has been advocated as a
potentially effective yet unproven strategy for addressing this problem. Implicit in this
approach is the need for an unbiased decision aid that not only educates patients about the
pros and cons of the different strategies so as to enable them to identify a preferred
strategy but also empowers patients to take a proactive role in the decision-making process,
thereby increasing satisfaction and promoting adherence. From a logistical standpoint, the
decision aid must also be easy to implement in the ambulatory setting so as to maximize use
but minimize demands on physician time and office resources. To address this need, we have
developed an interactive, web-based decision aid and implementation strategy for use in
routine clinical practice.

Comparison(s): Average risk subjects assigned to one of two intervention arms (decision aid
alone versus decision aid plus personalized risk assessment with feedback) compared to a
control arm(generic website that discusses lifestyle changes that can reduce overall cancer
risk).

Inclusion Criteria:

- Asymptomatic average-risk subjects

- Under the direct care of one of participating site's staff (attending) physicians or
physician extenders;

- No prior screening other than FOBT;

- No major co-morbidities that preclude CRC screening by any method

Exclusion Criteria:

- Prior CRC screening by any method other than fecal occult blood testing

- High-risk condition (personal history of colorectal cancer or polyps, family history
of colorectal cancer or polyps involving one or more first degree relatives, chronic
inflammatory bowel disease)

- Lack of fluency in written and spoken English (since decision aid and personalized
risk assessment tool will be in English only due to funding issues);

- Comorbidities that preclude CRC screening by any method
We found this trial at
2
sites
1 Boston Medical Center Pl
Boston, Massachusetts 02118
617.638.8000
Boston Med Center Boston Medical Center (BMC) is a 496-bed academic medical center located in...
?
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Boston, Massachusetts 02127
?
mi
from
Boston, MA
Click here to add this to my saved trials