Amiodarone, Lidocaine or Neither for Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Ventricular Fibrillation or Tachycardia
Status: | Active, not recruiting |
---|---|
Conditions: | Cardiology |
Therapuetic Areas: | Cardiology / Vascular Diseases |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 18 - Any |
Updated: | 4/21/2016 |
Start Date: | May 2012 |
End Date: | March 2016 |
Amiodarone, Lidocaine or Neither for Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) or Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)
The primary objective of the trial is to determine if survival to hospital discharge is
improved with early therapeutic administration of a new Captisol-Enabled formulation of IV
amiodarone (Nexterone-PM101) compared to placebo.
improved with early therapeutic administration of a new Captisol-Enabled formulation of IV
amiodarone (Nexterone-PM101) compared to placebo.
The primary objective of the trial is to determine if survival to hospital discharge is
improved with early therapeutic administration of a new Captisol-Enabled formulation of IV
amiodarone (PM101) compared to placebo.
The corresponding null hypothesis is that survival to hospital discharge is identically
distributed when out-of-hospital VF/VT arrest is treated with PM101 or placebo.
The secondary objectives of the trial are to determine if survival to hospital discharge is
improved with early therapeutic administration of:
1. Lidocaine compared to placebo
2. PM101 compared to lidocaine The corresponding null hypotheses are that survival to
hospital admission is identically distributed when out-of-hospital VF/VT arrest is
treated with lidocaine as compared with placebo, and with PM101 as compared with
lidocaine.
improved with early therapeutic administration of a new Captisol-Enabled formulation of IV
amiodarone (PM101) compared to placebo.
The corresponding null hypothesis is that survival to hospital discharge is identically
distributed when out-of-hospital VF/VT arrest is treated with PM101 or placebo.
The secondary objectives of the trial are to determine if survival to hospital discharge is
improved with early therapeutic administration of:
1. Lidocaine compared to placebo
2. PM101 compared to lidocaine The corresponding null hypotheses are that survival to
hospital admission is identically distributed when out-of-hospital VF/VT arrest is
treated with lidocaine as compared with placebo, and with PM101 as compared with
lidocaine.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age at least 18 years or local age of consent
- Non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by Resuscitation Outcomes
Consortium (ROC) emergency medical services (EMS) with advanced life support
capability
- VF or pulseless VT presenting as the initial arrest arrhythmia or results from
conversion of another arrhythmia (such as transient asystole or pulseless electrical
activity)
- Incessant or recurrent VF/VT after receipt of ≥ 1 shocks
- Established vascular access
Exclusion Criteria:
- Asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA) as the initial arrest rhythm who
never transition to VF or pulseless VT
- Written advance directive to not attempt resuscitation (DNAR)
- Blunt, penetrating, or burn-related injury
- Exsanguination
- Protected populations (prisoners, pregnancy, children under local age of consent)
- Treated exclusively by non-ROC EMS agency/provider, or by basic life support-only
capable ROC EMS providers
- Prior receipt of open label lidocaine or amiodarone during resuscitation
We found this trial at
8
sites
Dallas, Texas 75390
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
542 King Edward Avenue
Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5
Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials