Electrical Impedance Myography and Ultrasound as Biomarkers of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Status: | Completed |
---|---|
Conditions: | Neurology, Orthopedic |
Therapuetic Areas: | Neurology, Orthopedics / Podiatry |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 2 - 30 |
Updated: | 4/21/2016 |
Start Date: | April 2012 |
End Date: | September 2015 |
Researchers at Children's Hospital Boston Neurology Department invite children to
participate in a new research study. Researchers are looking for boys ages 2 - 30 with
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) and healthy boys ages 2 - 30 (without any nerve or muscle
concerns) to serve as controls. The study is evaluating a new technique that will test nerve
and muscle function. The testing is all pain free.
Children participating in the study will come in for 10 visits over two years. Visits will
take place every month at first, then less often for the remaining visits. The tests for the
study itself take approximately 2hours. If participants are interested or would like to
learn more about the study, please call Lavanya Madabusi at 617-919-3554 or
Lavanya.Madabusi@childrens.harvard.edu. All inquiries will be kept strictly confidential.
participate in a new research study. Researchers are looking for boys ages 2 - 30 with
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) and healthy boys ages 2 - 30 (without any nerve or muscle
concerns) to serve as controls. The study is evaluating a new technique that will test nerve
and muscle function. The testing is all pain free.
Children participating in the study will come in for 10 visits over two years. Visits will
take place every month at first, then less often for the remaining visits. The tests for the
study itself take approximately 2hours. If participants are interested or would like to
learn more about the study, please call Lavanya Madabusi at 617-919-3554 or
Lavanya.Madabusi@childrens.harvard.edu. All inquiries will be kept strictly confidential.
Characterized by progressive disability leading to death, Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)
remains one of the most common and devastating neuromuscular disorders of childhood.
Although a variety of promising new treatment strategies are in development, outcome
measures for clinical trials remain limited for the most part to a set of functional
measures, such as the six-minute walk test. While clearly useful, such measures are impacted
by unrelated factors, such as mood and effort, and have limited repeatability. To address
this and other limitations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now being investigated as a
surrogate measure. However, more easily applied, cost-effective, office-based surrogate
measures that provide high repeatability and sensitivity while still correlating strongly to
disease status would find wider use in Phase II and possibly in Phase III clinical trials in
DMD. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and electrical impedance myography (EIM) are two
techniques that could serve in this role. In QUS, muscle pathology (fibrosis and fatty
infiltration) in DMD results in an increase in energy reflected back (backscatter) to the
ultrasound. The amount of backscatter can be measured directly by analyzing the raw
frequency-based acoustic data or indirectly by controlled processing of the gray-scale
image. EIM, in contrast, relies upon the application of localized electrical current and
measurement of the resulting surface voltages, but is similarly impacted by the fibrotic
changes that develop as muscle disease progresses. Here, the investigators propose to
evaluate and compare both methodologies simultaneously in a group of DMD patients and normal
subjects in order to assess their ability to identify clinically meaningful alterations in
muscle health over short intervals of time. As a final exploratory analysis, the
investigators will also study the possibility of combining the two modalities. The results
of this work will have broad application as they could be applied to a variety of
neuromuscular conditions, including other muscular dystrophies. Thus, the hypothesis of this
proposal is that both QUS and EIM can serve as convenient, non-invasive, clinically
meaningful surrogate markers of disease progression in DMD that surpass the functional
measures currently in use.
remains one of the most common and devastating neuromuscular disorders of childhood.
Although a variety of promising new treatment strategies are in development, outcome
measures for clinical trials remain limited for the most part to a set of functional
measures, such as the six-minute walk test. While clearly useful, such measures are impacted
by unrelated factors, such as mood and effort, and have limited repeatability. To address
this and other limitations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now being investigated as a
surrogate measure. However, more easily applied, cost-effective, office-based surrogate
measures that provide high repeatability and sensitivity while still correlating strongly to
disease status would find wider use in Phase II and possibly in Phase III clinical trials in
DMD. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and electrical impedance myography (EIM) are two
techniques that could serve in this role. In QUS, muscle pathology (fibrosis and fatty
infiltration) in DMD results in an increase in energy reflected back (backscatter) to the
ultrasound. The amount of backscatter can be measured directly by analyzing the raw
frequency-based acoustic data or indirectly by controlled processing of the gray-scale
image. EIM, in contrast, relies upon the application of localized electrical current and
measurement of the resulting surface voltages, but is similarly impacted by the fibrotic
changes that develop as muscle disease progresses. Here, the investigators propose to
evaluate and compare both methodologies simultaneously in a group of DMD patients and normal
subjects in order to assess their ability to identify clinically meaningful alterations in
muscle health over short intervals of time. As a final exploratory analysis, the
investigators will also study the possibility of combining the two modalities. The results
of this work will have broad application as they could be applied to a variety of
neuromuscular conditions, including other muscular dystrophies. Thus, the hypothesis of this
proposal is that both QUS and EIM can serve as convenient, non-invasive, clinically
meaningful surrogate markers of disease progression in DMD that surpass the functional
measures currently in use.
Inclusion criteria (DMD):
1. Genetically or histologically established diagnosis of DMD
2. Male, age 2 - 30
Inclusion criteria (Control):
1. Male, age 2 - 30
Exclusion criteria (DMD):
1. Presence of implanted pacemaker or other electrical device
2. Presence of a superimposed neuromuscular or other medical condition that
substantially impacts the individual's health
Exclusion criteria (control):
1. Presence or past history of a neuromuscular disorder or other disease that
substantially impacts health
2. Presence of implanted pacemaker or other electrical device.
We found this trial at
1
site
Click here to add this to my saved trials