Vaginal Electrical Stimulation Versus Neuromodulation



Status:Completed
Conditions:Overactive Bladder
Therapuetic Areas:Gastroenterology
Healthy:No
Age Range:21 - 99
Updated:6/10/2016
Start Date:March 2011
End Date:April 2016

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

Vaginal Electrical Stimulation Versus Sacral Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Refractory Overactive Bladder: A Pilot Study

This prospective study compares quality of life measures of patients with refractory
overactive bladder, between two modes of neuromodulation: vaginal electrical stimulation
(Group A) and sacral nerve stimulation (Group B).

The specific aims are:

1. To characterize patient symptom bother score, quality of life, and body image scores in
patients obtaining sacral nerve stimulation, as compared to vaginal electrical stimulation.

- Hypothesis 1: Both modes of neuromodulation will impact patients' scores in quality of
life, patient symptoms, and body image questionnaires.

All participants will have a standardized intake history which will include age, weight,
history of prior treatment for incontinence, medication list, obstetric and gynecologic
history, medical history, and surgical history, as well as a complete review of systems. The
physical examination will include vital signs (including BMI), genitourinary exam, including
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ), and neurologic exam. All patients will undergo
spontaneous uroflowmetry, urine dipstick from catheterized specimen, multichannel
urodynamics, and 3-day voiding diary. Measurement of post-void residual will also be
obtained. Completion of the UDI-69, King's Health Questionnaire10, and the Modified Body
Image Perception Scale (MBIS) will also be part of the initial visit 11,12.

All participants taking anticholinergics will undergo a 2 week flush-out period prior to the
intake assessment. After the intake assessment, the provider will determine which treatment
option is appropriate to the participant, and they will then be assigned to one of the two
treatment arms: Group A will use vaginal electrical stimulation using the Empi Intravaginal
Stimulation Unit Minnova (Empi, St. Paul, MN, USA) and participants in Group B will receive
sacral neuromodulation using InterStim (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

Inclusion Criteria:

- Diagnosis of refractory OAB (+/- UUI)*

- Female Gender

- Eligible for both treatment interventions

- Available for 8 weeks of follow-up

- Able to complete study assessments

- Must discontinue anticholinergics within 2 weeks of intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

- Age < 21

- Pregnancy

- Stage 3 or 4 pelvic organ prolapse

- Current use of anticholinergics

- Urinary tract infection

- Undergoing concurrent treatment for pelvic organ prolapse

- Unstable or serious cardiac arrhythmia

- Implanted pacemaker

- Postvoid residual > 100ml

- Unstable seizure disorder

- Dementia or inability to follow instructions
We found this trial at
1
site
940 NE 13th St
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73190
(405) 271-6458
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center The OU Health Sciences Center is composed of seven...
?
mi
from
Oklahoma City, OK
Click here to add this to my saved trials