Comparison of Escalating Doses of IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®) in the Treatment of Glabellar Rhytids

Introduction Previously FDA-approved Botulinum type A toxins have been utilized in the upper
face to treat glabellar rhytids for nearly two decades. Botox® Cosmetic (Allergan, Irvine,
CA), is the first FDA-approved Botulinum toxin type A to be approved in the United States
for the treatment of glabellar rhytids. Its efficacy and safety have been proven in multiple
studies. Approximately two years ago, Dysport® (Medicis, Scottsdale, AZ) also received FDA
approval for the treatment of dynamic glabellar rhytids. While both products have been on
the market in Europe for over two decades, they have only been used in the United States for
cosmetic applications for the past ten years. Xeomin® (Merz Pharmaceuticals, Frankfurt,
Germany), at first, obtained FDA approval for the treatment of cervical dystonia and
blepharospasm - two applications which the previous two botulinum type A toxins
(onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA) had initially received prior to cosmetic
approval. More recently, Xeomin® has been approved for cosmetic use. This study aims to
assess the efficacy of varying doses of incobotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of glabellar
rhytids.

Background Cosmetic procedures have been in increasing demand to reverse the appearance of
advancing age, particularly procedures that improve the appearance of the aging face.
Noninvasive procedures with little to no downtime that offer significant improvement to the
aging appearance of the skin and underlying musculature are often preferred procedures to
surgical options. Although no procedure is entirely risk free, continuing research is
required to provide a safe and efficacious approach to aesthetic procedures for treating the
aging face.

Although there are five factors that contribute to the appearance of the aging face,1 there
are two anatomical units that most influence the appearance of facial rhytids: the skin and
its underlying musculature. Many therapies have evolved to treat rhytids including
resurfacing, topical preparations, soft tissue injectable fillers, and lastly, botulinum
toxin.

Relaxation of facial musculature is routinely accomplished for cosmetic use by the use of
Clostridium botulinum type A (BoNT-A). Clostridium botulinum type A toxin reduces the
recruitment of specific muscle groups. Many studies have been published in peer-reviewed
medical journals regarding the cosmetic use of this biologic.2-11 Clostridium botulinum in
the form of Botox® Cosmetic (onabotulinumtoxinA) is FDA-approved for cosmetic use in the
treatment of rhytids in the glabellar region. Dysport® (abobotulinumtoxinA) has been used
similarly to treat the glabellar region received FDA approval in 2009. Xeomin®
(incobotulinumtoxinA) received FDA approval in October 2010 for the treatment of cervical
dystonia and blepharospasm, and has been used globally since 2005. Several studies have
noted its efficacy in these clinical applications.12-16 More recently, Xeomin®
(incobotulinumtoxinA) obtained FDA approval in July 2011 for cosmetic use. Its maker employs
a manufacturing process which has isolated the active protein and eliminated accessory
proteins present in other formulations.

Many studies have demonstrated the effect of botulinum toxin on facial rhytids produced by
underlying coordinated muscle groups. Those of the glabellar area, upper forehead, lower
forehead, periocular and perinasal area are particularly well-documented. Previous reports
of Dysport® and Botox® Cosmetic medications show effective relaxation of glabellar rhytids
after injection.12-17

Xeomin® is generally well-tolerated, although side effects may occur, such as temporary
paralysis of adjacent muscle groups close to those injected, which may be due to local
spread of toxin from the injection site and /or misplaced injections. Most side effects are
mild or moderate severity, and of limited duration.

The most common adverse event (AE) seen following the use of Dysport®, Botox® Cosmetic or
Xeomin® for the treatment of blepharospasm is ptosis. Some patients have reported diplopia
or symptoms resulting from the spread of effect to mid-facial muscles. Other AEs reported
were injection site reaction, skin rashes, influenza-like symptoms, dry eyes, tearing,
bruising, and eyelid swelling. Reversible ophthalmoplegia has been reported after excessive
dosing.

Studies have shown safety of high doses of botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of
spasticity and hyperhydrosis in both children and adults with doses ranging from 400 to
upwards of 1200 units in a single-dose injection.18,19

No clinical studies have been conducted in North America to determine the optimal dosing of
Xeomin® for cosmetic use in the glabellar area. Though the manufacturers of Xeomin®
purported a 1:1 dosage ratio with Botox® Cosmetic, this conversion has not been demonstrated
or proven in facial cosmetic applications. This study intends to compare varying doses of
incobotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of glabellar rhytids to assess which dosage is the most
optimal in terms of efficacy and duration of action.

Investigational Agents Xeomin® is supplied as a 100 unit vial of Clostridium botulinum type
A exotoxin, sterilely prepared and vacuum-dried without preservatives.

Dose Rationale and Risk/Benefits:

Administration Eligible patients will receive Xeomin® doses of escalating-units divided
among 5 injection points (0.25 mL total) in the glabellar region on Day 0 of the study, as
described in the instructions section.

For Study Purposes:

For study purposes, only one injection session will be performed at Day 0 of the study.
Subsequent follow-up visits will only monitor the effects of the single injection session at
time 0.

Packaging, Labeling, and Storage Commercially-available active drug (Xeomin®) vials, bearing
a unique lot number, will be obtained from Merz Pharmaceuticals.

Study medications may be maintained during transit and storage within a temperature range of
20o to 25o C, refrigerated within a temperature range of 2o to 8o C or frozen within a
temperature range of -20o to -10o C.

Drug accountability The investigator will administer study medication only to patients
included in this study and following the procedures set out in this study protocol. Each
dispensing will be documented in the CRFs and the study medication dispensing log.

Concomitant Medications and Treatments Any medication the patient takes other than the study
medication specified in the protocol is considered a concomitant medication. This applies to
prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, and to herbal supplements, whether taken
systemically or applied topically. In addition, any treatment the patient receives other
than the study medication is considered a concomitant treatment. This applies to cosmetic
treatments of the face and neck area. All concomitant medications and concomitant treatments
must be recorded in the CRFs.

Prohibited medication classes and treatments are described under "Exclusion Criteria". In
the event that a prohibited treatment (e.g. microdermabrasion, Intense Pulse Light,
light-emitting diodes, or radio-frequency) is received, it must be documented on the CRFs.

Study Objectives

Primary Objective:

To compare the efficacy of escalating doses of Xeomin® in the treatment of glabellar
rhytids.

Secondary Objective:

To assess the duration of action of escalating doses of Xeomin® in the treatment of
glabellar rhytids.

Secondary Objective:

To determine the safety and presence of any adverse effects of Xeomin® in the treatment of
glabellar rhytids.

Study Design General Design

- Phase IV, single-center, prospective, open-label study.

- 60 subjects with moderate to severe glabellar rhytids.

- 12 month duration

- 16 Visits: Visit 0 Screening/Baseline(treatment), Visit 1 follow-up (day 1), Visit 2
follow-up (day 4), Visit 3 follow-up (day 7), Visit 4 (day 30), Visit 5 (day 60), Visit
6 (day 90), Visit 7 (day 120), Visit 8 (day 150), Visit 9 (day 180), Visit 10 (day
210), Visit 11 (day 240), Visit 12 (day 270), Visit 13 (day 300), Visit 14 (day 330),
Visit 15 (day 360). If patients are assessed and have returned to baseline at any visit
prior to Visit 15, then they will be seen at their next two sequential follow-up visits
to allow for any possible variations in assessment or adverse events.

Primary Study Endpoints

Efficacy and duration endpoints will be determined by:

- The investigator's live assessment of glabellar rhytids at maximum contraction and at
rest.

Secondary adverse event endpoints will be determined by:

- The patient's assessment of any symptoms experienced between follow-up visits as
recorded on the CRF.

Inclusion Criteria:

Male or female patients who meet all of the following criteria are eligible for this
study:

- Eighteen years of age or older.

- Moderate to severe vertical glabellar lines at maximum frown (score of [2] or [3] by
physician assessment)

- Negative pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential.

- Time and ability to complete the study and comply with instructions.

- Understanding of the study and contents of the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who meet any of the following criteria are not eligible for this study:

- Previous treatment to the glabellar area with Dysport® or Botox® Cosmetic or other
botulinum toxin within 90 days of entry into the study. Botulinum toxin treatment of
areas other than the glabellar area at any time during the study.

- Patients with an ongoing treatment-related AE from any Dysport® or Botox® Cosmetic or
botulinum toxin study.

- Inability to substantially lessen glabellar lines by physically spreading them apart.

- Soft tissue augmentation of the glabellar area (e.g. collagen-type implants, or
hyaluronic acid fillers) at any time during the current study.

- Permanent or semi-permanent dermal fillers in the glabellar area at any time.

- Ablative skin resurfacing on the glabellar area at any time preceding the study or
planning to during the current study.

- Upper eyelid blepharoplasty or brow-lift at any time preceding the study or planning
to during the current study.

- Non-ablative treatments in the glabellar area for skin dyschromias (e.g. Intense
Pulsed Light, light-emitting diodes) at any time during the current study.

- Non-ablative dermal treatment in the glabellar area for skin tightening (e.g.
radiofrequency treatments at any time preceding the current study or plan to have
this done during the current study)

- Retinoid, microdermabrasion, or prescription-level glycolic acid treatments to the
glabellar area within 2 weeks prior to study participation or during the current
study.

- Concurrent therapy that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with
evaluation of the efficacy or safety of the medication.

- Active infection of the glabellar area (e.g. acute acne lesions or ulcers).

- Pregnant women, nursing mothers, or women who are planning pregnancy during the
study, or think they may be pregnant at the start of the study. Throughout the course
of the study, women of childbearing potential must use reliable forms of
contraception (e.g. abstinence, oral contraceptives for more than 12 consecutive
weeks prior to enrollment, or spermicide and condoms).

- Current history of chronic drug or alcohol abuse.

- Enrollment in any active study involving the use of investigational devices or drugs.

- Current facial palsy.

- Marked facial asymmetry, ptosis, excessive dermatochalasis, deep dermal scarring, or
thick sebaceous skin.

- Neuromuscular junctional disorders (myasthenia gravis).

- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any botulinum toxin or any component of Dysport®
or Botox® Cosmetic.

- Clinically diagnosed anxiety disorder, or any other significant psychiatric disorder
(e.g. depression) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the
patient's participation in the study.

- Concurrent use of medications that affect neuromuscular transmission, such as
curare-like depolarizing agents, lincosamides, polymyxins, anticholinesterases
affecting the striated muscle, and aminoglycoside antibiotics.

- Presence of any condition (e.g. neuromuscular disorder or other disorder that could
interfere with neuromuscular function) or circumstance that, in the judgment of the
investigator, might increase the risk to the patient or decrease the chance of
obtaining satisfactory data to achieve the objectives of the study.