Computerized Attention Training for Individuals With Acquired Brain Injury
| Status: | Recruiting |
|---|---|
| Conditions: | Cognitive Studies, Hospital, Neurology |
| Therapuetic Areas: | Neurology, Psychiatry / Psychology, Other |
| Healthy: | No |
| Age Range: | 21 - 80 |
| Updated: | 5/5/2014 |
| Start Date: | July 2011 |
| Contact: | Christina Marini, BA |
| Email: | christina.marini@brainplasticity.com |
| Phone: | 415-230-3741 |
Computerized Cognitive Treatment of Vigilance Deficits in Individuals With Acquired Brain Injury
Problems with attention are a common and debilitating consequence of brain injury. Studies
show that poor attention is the number one predictor of poor cognitive functioning one year
post-injury. This is due to the fact that attention is a necessary component of more complex
cognitive functions such as learning & memory, multi-tasking and problem solving. In many
cases, individuals may exhibit problems with spatial attention known as 'hemi-spatial
neglect syndrome' or simply 'neglect'. Many studies now show that the processing machinery
of the brain is plastic and remodeled throughout life by learning and experience, enabling
the strengthening of cognitive skills or abilities. The investigators own research has shown
that brief, daily computerized cognitive training that is sufficiently challenging,
goal-directed and adaptive enables intact brain structures to restore balance in attention
and compensate for disruptions in cognitive functioning.
show that poor attention is the number one predictor of poor cognitive functioning one year
post-injury. This is due to the fact that attention is a necessary component of more complex
cognitive functions such as learning & memory, multi-tasking and problem solving. In many
cases, individuals may exhibit problems with spatial attention known as 'hemi-spatial
neglect syndrome' or simply 'neglect'. Many studies now show that the processing machinery
of the brain is plastic and remodeled throughout life by learning and experience, enabling
the strengthening of cognitive skills or abilities. The investigators own research has shown
that brief, daily computerized cognitive training that is sufficiently challenging,
goal-directed and adaptive enables intact brain structures to restore balance in attention
and compensate for disruptions in cognitive functioning.
Participants will first engage in an assessment process to determine current level of
cognitive function. This process consists of paper-pencil surveys and computerized tests.
Following the assessment process, participants will engage in Internet browser-delivered
training sessions conducted on any internet-accessible computer. These trainings can be done
up to 7 times a week (once a day) or at participant's convenience (the investigators
recommend 4-5 times a week). Following the completion of training, participant's cognitive
function will be re-assessed. Participation is voluntary and participants may withdraw from
the study at any time.
cognitive function. This process consists of paper-pencil surveys and computerized tests.
Following the assessment process, participants will engage in Internet browser-delivered
training sessions conducted on any internet-accessible computer. These trainings can be done
up to 7 times a week (once a day) or at participant's convenience (the investigators
recommend 4-5 times a week). Following the completion of training, participant's cognitive
function will be re-assessed. Participation is voluntary and participants may withdraw from
the study at any time.
Inclusion:
1. Participants must 21 years or older and not pregnant as indicated by self-report
2. Participant must be fluent in English (indicated by self-report)
3. Participant must be able to engage with computerized cognitive tasks as indicated by
investigator's opinion after 30 minutes of computer interaction
4. Participants should have no history of chronic psychiatric or neurological condition
(preceding the current insult) as indicated by self-report
5. Normal vision (or corrected to normal vision) as indicated by self-report
6. Participants must be willing to commit to the time requirements of the study as
evidenced by written, informed consent.
7. Evidence of hemispatial neglect and/ or vigilance decline on at least one standard
measure (e.g., A-SCAN).
Exclusion:
1. Participants report or present a hand tremor that prevents the use of a computer
mouse or keyboard, in the opinion of the evaluating Principal or Sub-Investigator.
2. Unable to perform neuropsychological evaluations in the opinion of the evaluating
Principal or Sub-Investigator.
3. In the opinion of the consenting staff person, the participant cannot comprehend,
follow instructions, or is incapable of providing written, informed consent.
4. In the opinion of the consenting staff person, participant is not capable of giving
informed consent and does not have a Legal Authorized Representative.
5. History of recurrent psychiatric impairment as indicated by self-report.
6. History of drug or alcohol abuse as indicated by self-report.
7. History of significant medical diseases or multiple neurological events of the head
as indicated by self-report.
We found this trial at
1
site
Click here to add this to my saved trials
