Compare the Efficacy of Mepilex and Keramatrix in Second Degree Burn Wounds
Status: | Not yet recruiting |
---|---|
Conditions: | Hospital |
Therapuetic Areas: | Other |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | Any - 18 |
Updated: | 7/11/2015 |
Start Date: | January 2015 |
End Date: | October 2017 |
Contact: | Cathy Reed, BSN |
Email: | ca2reed@utmb.edu |
Phone: | 409-770-6731 |
Prospective,Randomized, Parallel Study to Compare the Efficacy of Mepilex and Keramatrix in Promoting Healing of Second Degree Burn Wounds
The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which Keramatrix dressing promotes
the healing of second-degree burn wounds in pediatric patients.
the healing of second-degree burn wounds in pediatric patients.
Efficacy in promoting wound healing will be determined through comparison to Mepilex, an
established burn wound dressing.
established burn wound dressing.
Inclusion Criteria:
patient age 0-18 years old Flame or scald burn 10-30% total body surface area burned
Partial-thickness second-degree burns Admission within 72 hours of burn injury Clean
non-infected wound as diagnosed by the attending physician
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient older than 18
- Causes other than flame or scald injuries (ie.chemical or frostbite)
- Wounds noted to be contaminated or infected
- Patients who have received previous treatment efforts (topical dressings or previous
wound debridement)
- Pregnancy lactation
- Co-morbidity which may compromise healing: known history of AIDS, ARC, HIV, cancer,
autoimmune diseases,cirrhosis, tuberculosis, chronic glucocorticoid therapy, diabetes
mellitus, renal insufficiency, hepatic disease, congestive heart failure prior to
burn injury, associated severe head injury requiring specific treatment
- known allergy to sheep's wool
We found this trial at
1
site
Click here to add this to my saved trials