Lower Extremity Regional Anesthesia and Infrainguinal Bypass Grafting
Status: | Completed |
---|---|
Conditions: | Peripheral Vascular Disease, Cardiology |
Therapuetic Areas: | Cardiology / Vascular Diseases |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 19 - Any |
Updated: | 2/7/2015 |
Start Date: | May 2013 |
End Date: | May 2014 |
Contact: | Thomas A Nicholas, MD |
Email: | tnichola@unmc.edu |
Phone: | 402-957-3758 |
In this investigation, the investigators will attempt to demonstrate that patients who have
received nerve blocks (regional anesthesia) prior to open surgical vascular bypass of the
lower extremities (infrainguinal bypass grafting) will have improved surgical outcomes
namely a reduction in the rates of death, wound infection, graft thrombosis, graft revision,
and amputation. As well, the investigators anticipate that patients who have undergone
regional anesthesia for infrainguinal bypass grafting will have improved secondary outcomes
with respect to a decreased length of stay, narcotic consumption, nausea and vomiting,
post-operative cognitive dysfunction, major cardiac events, post-operative pain, and
hyperglycemic episodes.
received nerve blocks (regional anesthesia) prior to open surgical vascular bypass of the
lower extremities (infrainguinal bypass grafting) will have improved surgical outcomes
namely a reduction in the rates of death, wound infection, graft thrombosis, graft revision,
and amputation. As well, the investigators anticipate that patients who have undergone
regional anesthesia for infrainguinal bypass grafting will have improved secondary outcomes
with respect to a decreased length of stay, narcotic consumption, nausea and vomiting,
post-operative cognitive dysfunction, major cardiac events, post-operative pain, and
hyperglycemic episodes.
Background The post-operative benefits of regional anesthesia have been described in
patients undergoing vascular access surgery(1, 2). Some of the benefits that have been
identified are improved vascular flow, decreased thrombosis rates, and early maturation of
grafts(2). It is speculated that these benefits can be mainly attributed to sympathetic
blockade by regional anesthesia. Recent literature review has not identified any prior
studies which have attempted to prospectively identify if there are improved surgical
outcomes in patients undergoing revascularization surgery when regional anesthesia is
utilized. However, Kashyap et al. reported that regional anesthesia may decrease the
incidence of perioperative thrombosis in patients who had undergone infra-popliteal
revascularization surgery over a 20 year period(3). In this investigation we will attempt to
ascertain whether or not there will be improved surgical outcomes namely a reduction in the
rates of death, wound infection, graft thrombosis, graft revision, and amputation. As well,
we anticipate that patients who have undergone regional anesthesia for infrainguinal bypass
grafting will have improved secondary outcomes with respect to a decreased length of stay,
narcotic consumption, nausea and vomiting, post-operative cognitive dysfunction, major
cardiac events, post-operative pain, and hyperglycemic episodes.
Methods After Investigational Review Board approval, written informed consent will be
obtained from 20 patients undergoing fem-popliteal bypass surgery at University of Nebraska
Medical Center and enrolled in our prospective cohort registry. Patients will be excluded
from the study if age is less than 19 years, allergies to amide anesthetics, inability to
undergo general anesthesia, acute limb ischemia, any existence of contraindications to
regional anesthesia in the presence of antiplatelet or anticoagulative drugs, or evidence of
gross neurological dysfunction of the lower extremity. Baseline health data of the patient
will be recorded. Ultrasound will be performed with a linear 10- to 13-Megahertz probe
while performing the nerve block. Standard American Society of Anesthesiology monitors will
be applied and the patient sedated at the discretion of the anesthetic team. Complications
such as vascular puncture, pain on injection, or systemic toxicity will be recorded. A
perineural dosing regimen for the regional blocks will be as follows: (femoral block) 20cc
of 0.5% ropivicaine and (sub-gluteal posterior sciatic block) 20cc of 0.2% ropivicaine.
Epinephrine will be withheld from the local anesthetic in order to prevent the potential of
further ischemic complications. The patient will then undergo general anesthesia at the
discretion of the anesthetic team. Any anesthetic or surgical complication will be recorded
during the OR interval. The type of graft utilized and specific location of arterial
intervention will be recorded.
Following surgery, the patient will be monitored and data recorded daily while the patient
is recovering in the hospital. Primary outcomes which will be recorded include: death, wound
infection, graft thrombosis, graft revision, and amputation. Secondary outcomes which will
be recorded are pain scores, nausea and vomiting, 24 hour narcotic consumption, graft
failure (defined as any occlusion requiring return to operating room), any related return to
the OR for the index procedure, any major adverse cardiac events (MACE), administration of
warfarin or antiplatelet medications, average 24 hour blood sugar, creatinine levels,
postoperative cognitive dysfunction, and requirement of supplemental oxygen upon discharge
from the PACU. As well, the patient will be queried for resumption of tobacco products. The
patient's length of hospital stay will be recorded.
On discharge there will be continued surveillance for the following primary outcomes: death,
wound infection, graft thrombosis, graft revision, and amputation. The secondary outcomes
which will be recorded are as follows: presence of pain at rest, pain on ambulation,
continued administration of anticoagulants or antiplatelets, graft failure (defined as any
occlusion requiring return to operating room), any related return to the OR for the index
procedure, any major adverse cardiac events (MACE), average 24 hour blood sugar, creatinine
levels, and all ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) and doppler ultrasound reports will be
recorded. Also, patients will be queried for resumption of tobacco products. These
observations will be recorded on post-operative day 7, 31, and 93.
A comparison group of patients (N=20) who have undergone infra-inguinal bypass grafting will
be obtained from retrospective chart review. Patients who have undergone regional or
neuroaxial anesthesia for their bypass procedure will be excluded. As well, patients will be
matched to their cohorts by age, sex, health comorbidities including: Congestive heart
failure, smoking, diabetes, and renal dysfunction, and chronic anticoagulants or
antiplatelet medication administration. The same primary and secondary outcome data obtained
in the prospective portion of this study will be sought and recorded by chart review.
Conclusion Improved vascular surgical outcomes have been described in patients receiving
regional anesthesia and neuroaxial anesthesia(2-4). Specifically, we anticipate a decrease
in overall rates of death, wound infection, graft thrombosis, graft revision, and amputation
in patients receiving regional anesthesia for infra-inguinal bypass grafting. As well, we
hypothesize that patients receiving regional anesthestics will have improved secondary
outcomes including decreased length of stay, narcotic consumption, nausea and vomiting,
post-operative cognitive dysfunction, cardiac events, post-operative pain, and hyperglycemic
episodes.
patients undergoing vascular access surgery(1, 2). Some of the benefits that have been
identified are improved vascular flow, decreased thrombosis rates, and early maturation of
grafts(2). It is speculated that these benefits can be mainly attributed to sympathetic
blockade by regional anesthesia. Recent literature review has not identified any prior
studies which have attempted to prospectively identify if there are improved surgical
outcomes in patients undergoing revascularization surgery when regional anesthesia is
utilized. However, Kashyap et al. reported that regional anesthesia may decrease the
incidence of perioperative thrombosis in patients who had undergone infra-popliteal
revascularization surgery over a 20 year period(3). In this investigation we will attempt to
ascertain whether or not there will be improved surgical outcomes namely a reduction in the
rates of death, wound infection, graft thrombosis, graft revision, and amputation. As well,
we anticipate that patients who have undergone regional anesthesia for infrainguinal bypass
grafting will have improved secondary outcomes with respect to a decreased length of stay,
narcotic consumption, nausea and vomiting, post-operative cognitive dysfunction, major
cardiac events, post-operative pain, and hyperglycemic episodes.
Methods After Investigational Review Board approval, written informed consent will be
obtained from 20 patients undergoing fem-popliteal bypass surgery at University of Nebraska
Medical Center and enrolled in our prospective cohort registry. Patients will be excluded
from the study if age is less than 19 years, allergies to amide anesthetics, inability to
undergo general anesthesia, acute limb ischemia, any existence of contraindications to
regional anesthesia in the presence of antiplatelet or anticoagulative drugs, or evidence of
gross neurological dysfunction of the lower extremity. Baseline health data of the patient
will be recorded. Ultrasound will be performed with a linear 10- to 13-Megahertz probe
while performing the nerve block. Standard American Society of Anesthesiology monitors will
be applied and the patient sedated at the discretion of the anesthetic team. Complications
such as vascular puncture, pain on injection, or systemic toxicity will be recorded. A
perineural dosing regimen for the regional blocks will be as follows: (femoral block) 20cc
of 0.5% ropivicaine and (sub-gluteal posterior sciatic block) 20cc of 0.2% ropivicaine.
Epinephrine will be withheld from the local anesthetic in order to prevent the potential of
further ischemic complications. The patient will then undergo general anesthesia at the
discretion of the anesthetic team. Any anesthetic or surgical complication will be recorded
during the OR interval. The type of graft utilized and specific location of arterial
intervention will be recorded.
Following surgery, the patient will be monitored and data recorded daily while the patient
is recovering in the hospital. Primary outcomes which will be recorded include: death, wound
infection, graft thrombosis, graft revision, and amputation. Secondary outcomes which will
be recorded are pain scores, nausea and vomiting, 24 hour narcotic consumption, graft
failure (defined as any occlusion requiring return to operating room), any related return to
the OR for the index procedure, any major adverse cardiac events (MACE), administration of
warfarin or antiplatelet medications, average 24 hour blood sugar, creatinine levels,
postoperative cognitive dysfunction, and requirement of supplemental oxygen upon discharge
from the PACU. As well, the patient will be queried for resumption of tobacco products. The
patient's length of hospital stay will be recorded.
On discharge there will be continued surveillance for the following primary outcomes: death,
wound infection, graft thrombosis, graft revision, and amputation. The secondary outcomes
which will be recorded are as follows: presence of pain at rest, pain on ambulation,
continued administration of anticoagulants or antiplatelets, graft failure (defined as any
occlusion requiring return to operating room), any related return to the OR for the index
procedure, any major adverse cardiac events (MACE), average 24 hour blood sugar, creatinine
levels, and all ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) and doppler ultrasound reports will be
recorded. Also, patients will be queried for resumption of tobacco products. These
observations will be recorded on post-operative day 7, 31, and 93.
A comparison group of patients (N=20) who have undergone infra-inguinal bypass grafting will
be obtained from retrospective chart review. Patients who have undergone regional or
neuroaxial anesthesia for their bypass procedure will be excluded. As well, patients will be
matched to their cohorts by age, sex, health comorbidities including: Congestive heart
failure, smoking, diabetes, and renal dysfunction, and chronic anticoagulants or
antiplatelet medication administration. The same primary and secondary outcome data obtained
in the prospective portion of this study will be sought and recorded by chart review.
Conclusion Improved vascular surgical outcomes have been described in patients receiving
regional anesthesia and neuroaxial anesthesia(2-4). Specifically, we anticipate a decrease
in overall rates of death, wound infection, graft thrombosis, graft revision, and amputation
in patients receiving regional anesthesia for infra-inguinal bypass grafting. As well, we
hypothesize that patients receiving regional anesthestics will have improved secondary
outcomes including decreased length of stay, narcotic consumption, nausea and vomiting,
post-operative cognitive dysfunction, cardiac events, post-operative pain, and hyperglycemic
episodes.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients 19 years of age and older who are candidates to undergo infrainguinal bypass
grafting for the treatment of peripheral vascular disease
Exclusion Criteria:
- age is less than 19 years
- allergies to amide anesthetics
- inability to undergo general anesthesia
- acute limb ischemia
- any existence of contraindications to regional anesthesia in the presence of
antiplatelet or anticoagulative drugs
- evidence of gross neurological dysfunction of the lower extremity
We found this trial at
1
site
Univ of Nebraska Med Ctr A vital enterprise in the nation’s heartland, the University of...
Click here to add this to my saved trials