KAVIAR Study - Kyphoplasty And Vertebroplasty In the Augmentation and Restoration of Vertebral Body Compression Fractures
Status: | Terminated |
---|---|
Conditions: | Orthopedic |
Therapuetic Areas: | Orthopedics / Podiatry |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 21 - Any |
Updated: | 1/3/2018 |
Start Date: | August 2006 |
End Date: | July 2011 |
A Multicenter, Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial to Compare the Short- and Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of Balloon Kyphoplasty to Vertebroplasty in the Treatment of Painful, Acute Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Body Compression Fractures (VCFs).
Patients with osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures will be randomly assigned to
treatment with balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Over 2 years of follow-up, back pain,
back function, quality of life, adverse events, subsequent fractures and cumulative
healthcare costs will be compared.
treatment with balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. Over 2 years of follow-up, back pain,
back function, quality of life, adverse events, subsequent fractures and cumulative
healthcare costs will be compared.
Medtronic Spine LLC is sponsoring the KAVIAR study, a randomized clinical trial comparing
balloon kyphoplasty to vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body
compression fractures (VCFs). Up to 1,234 subjects at up to 75 study centers with one to
three VCFs and VB morphologies suitable for both balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty will
be randomly assigned to receive one or the other procedure. Study visits will occur at
baseline, 30 days postoperatively, and at 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. At all visits,
adverse events, back pain, back function and quality of life will be assessed. In addition, a
7-day phone call will be conducted, which will include assessment of back pain, narcotic use
and adverse events. At baseline, pre-discharge, 3-, 12- and 24-month visits, lateral spine
x-rays will be taken. The primary endpoint will be the proportion of patients with one or
more subsequent fractures at 12 and 24 months, detected radiographically as determined by a
core radiology laboratory. Secondary clinical endpoints include changes from baseline in back
pain, back function and quality of life, and adverse events. Secondary radiographic
comparisons include the restoration and maintenance of VB height and angulation, and sagittal
vertical axis, a measure of global sagittal balance. A postoperative CT scan will be
evaluated to detect cement extravasation and to examine the relationship between cement
distribution and clinical outcomes. Another important feature of the study is a detailed
healthcare utilization data assessment. Combined with a costing methodology based on Medicare
cost data and other sources, cumulative two-year healthcare costs related to VCF will be
estimated. Combined with quality of life measurements, the cost analysis will allow a
calculation of the relative cost-effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty.
Sample size is based on the primary endpoint, the proportion with subsequent fractures at 12
and 24 months.
balloon kyphoplasty to vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body
compression fractures (VCFs). Up to 1,234 subjects at up to 75 study centers with one to
three VCFs and VB morphologies suitable for both balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty will
be randomly assigned to receive one or the other procedure. Study visits will occur at
baseline, 30 days postoperatively, and at 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. At all visits,
adverse events, back pain, back function and quality of life will be assessed. In addition, a
7-day phone call will be conducted, which will include assessment of back pain, narcotic use
and adverse events. At baseline, pre-discharge, 3-, 12- and 24-month visits, lateral spine
x-rays will be taken. The primary endpoint will be the proportion of patients with one or
more subsequent fractures at 12 and 24 months, detected radiographically as determined by a
core radiology laboratory. Secondary clinical endpoints include changes from baseline in back
pain, back function and quality of life, and adverse events. Secondary radiographic
comparisons include the restoration and maintenance of VB height and angulation, and sagittal
vertical axis, a measure of global sagittal balance. A postoperative CT scan will be
evaluated to detect cement extravasation and to examine the relationship between cement
distribution and clinical outcomes. Another important feature of the study is a detailed
healthcare utilization data assessment. Combined with a costing methodology based on Medicare
cost data and other sources, cumulative two-year healthcare costs related to VCF will be
estimated. Combined with quality of life measurements, the cost analysis will allow a
calculation of the relative cost-effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty.
Sample size is based on the primary endpoint, the proportion with subsequent fractures at 12
and 24 months.
Inclusion Criteria
All subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be enrolled into the study:
1. Age > 21
2. 1 to 3 target VCFs meeting the following criteria:
1. Fracture due to diagnosed or presumed underlying primary or secondary
osteoporosis
2. All target VCFs are between T5 and L5
3. All target VCFs to be treated show either: i. Height change: An acute (< 6 month)
change in VB height or morphology from a previous x-ray, CT or MRI, with height
loss at the anterior, middle or posterior portion of the VB consistent with a
worsening of 1 or more grades by the Genant criteria (17), OR ii. Positive MRI or
bone scan: VB shows hyperintense signal on STIR sequence MRI or target VB is
positive on radionuclide bone scan
4. All VCFs to be treated have fracture age (time from pain onset to evaluation by
the Investigator) of 6 months or less
5. Back pain correlating with the location of at least one VCF
3. Treatment of all target VCFs is technically feasible by and clinically appropriate for
BOTH vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty. (Team approach only: Both the
vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty physician have reviewed radiographic studies
and agree to this prior to enrolling the subject in the study.)
4. Pre-treatment back pain by numerical rating scale (NRS) score > 4 (0-10 scale)
5. Pre-treatment Oswestry Disability Index >20 (0 - 100 scale)
6. Subject states availability for all study visits
7. Subject is able to understand the risks and benefits of participating in the study and
is willing to provide written informed consent
8. Subject has mental capacity to comply with the protocol requirements for 2-year
duration of study
Exclusion Criteria
Subjects who meet any of the following conditions may not be enrolled into the study:
1. VB morphology or configuration is such that either balloon kyphoplasty OR
vertebroplasty is not technically feasible for the targeted VCFs
2. Fracture due to high-energy trauma
3. Suspected OR proven cancer inside index vertebral body. Note that patients with
chemotherapy-related osteoporosis may be included.
4. Disabling back pain due to causes other than acute fracture (e.g., sacroiliac
fracture, symptomatic degenerative disc disease, lumbar spinal stenosis)
5. Any painful VCF with fracture age > 6 months
6. Any objective evidence of neurologic compromise at baseline
7. Previous balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty for any VCF
8. Spine stabilization beyond balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty required for targeted
VCFs
9. Significant clinical comorbidity that may potentially interfere with long-term data
collection or follow-up (e.g., dementia, severe comorbid illness)
10. Pre-existing conditions contrary to either balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty, such
as:
1. Irreversible coagulopathy or bleeding disorder. Note regarding reversible
coagulopathies: Subjects on coumadin or other anticoagulants may participate.
Investigators should follow routine practices for perioperative discontinuation
and re-initiation of anticoagulants.
2. Allergy to any device materials (e.g., bone cement) for balloon kyphoplasty or
vertebroplasty. Note that in subjects with allergy to iodine-based contrast,
other non-iodine contrast solutions may be used.
3. Any evidence of VB or systemic infection
11. Pregnant or child-bearing potential
We found this trial at
26
sites
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Saint Luke's Hospital, Kansas City Saint Luke's Hospital is a not-for-profit tertiary referral center committed...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center At Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, you'll find remarkable treatment...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Intermountain Medical Center Intermountain Medical Center is one of the most technologically advanced and patient-friendly...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Ochsner Medical Center Ochsner Medical Center is located near uptown New Orleans and includes acute...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Scott & White Memorial Hospital When Arthur C. Scott, MD, and Raleigh R. White Jr.,...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Toledo Hospital ProMedica’s Mission is to improve your health and well-being. And we at ProMedica...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials