Cough and Swallow Rehab Following Stroke
| Status: | Completed |
|---|---|
| Conditions: | Neurology |
| Therapuetic Areas: | Neurology |
| Healthy: | No |
| Age Range: | 50 - 85 |
| Updated: | 4/21/2016 |
| Start Date: | January 2011 |
| End Date: | April 2015 |
Cough and Swallow Rehabilitation Following Stroke
Stroke is the leading case of neurologic swallow dysfunction, or dysphagia. Post stroke
dysphagia is associated with approximately 50% increase in the rate of pneumonia diagnoses;
aspiration pneumonia is the most common respiratory complication in all stroke deaths,
accounting for a three-fold increase in the 30-day post stroke death rate. The long-term
goal of this systematic line of research is to decrease the morbidity, mortality, and health
care costs associated with disordered airway protection following stroke.
The overall hypothesis central to this proposal is that the ability to protect the airway is
dependent upon a continuum of multiple behaviors, including swallowing and cough. Safe,
efficient swallowing prevents material from entering the larynx and lower airway, and
effective cough ejects aspirate or mucus material. Currently, only one end of the continuum,
swallowing, is rigorously assessed in stroke patients. However, ineffective or disordered
cough is indicative of the inability to eject aspirate material or clear mucus and
secretions from the lower airway. Ineffective clearance and subsequent accumulation of
material in the lower airway increases the risk of chest infection. Hence, patients at the
greatest risk for chest infection would not only have disordered swallowing (dysphagia) but
also disordered cough (dystussia), meaning they are more likely to aspirate material and
then cannot effectively eject the aspirate from the airway. There is a high likelihood that
swallowing and cough are simultaneously disordered following stroke. To date, there is a
treatment that targets both swallowing and cough function in stroke patients.
Expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) increases expiratory muscle strength (Baker et
al., 2005) and there is evidence that supports its use to improve both swallow and cough
functions in patients with Parkinson's disease (Troche et al., in press). This cross-system,
device-driven approach to rehabilitating multiple contributors to airway protection deficits
is highly desirable in the stroke population due to the likelihood of the co-occurrence of
both swallow and cough disorders. To date, EMST has not been tested in stroke patients. We
propose that by including cough in the screening, evaluation and treatment processes for
disorders of airway protection, we will be able to better identify and treat patients most
at risk for airway compromise and associated sequelae.
dysphagia is associated with approximately 50% increase in the rate of pneumonia diagnoses;
aspiration pneumonia is the most common respiratory complication in all stroke deaths,
accounting for a three-fold increase in the 30-day post stroke death rate. The long-term
goal of this systematic line of research is to decrease the morbidity, mortality, and health
care costs associated with disordered airway protection following stroke.
The overall hypothesis central to this proposal is that the ability to protect the airway is
dependent upon a continuum of multiple behaviors, including swallowing and cough. Safe,
efficient swallowing prevents material from entering the larynx and lower airway, and
effective cough ejects aspirate or mucus material. Currently, only one end of the continuum,
swallowing, is rigorously assessed in stroke patients. However, ineffective or disordered
cough is indicative of the inability to eject aspirate material or clear mucus and
secretions from the lower airway. Ineffective clearance and subsequent accumulation of
material in the lower airway increases the risk of chest infection. Hence, patients at the
greatest risk for chest infection would not only have disordered swallowing (dysphagia) but
also disordered cough (dystussia), meaning they are more likely to aspirate material and
then cannot effectively eject the aspirate from the airway. There is a high likelihood that
swallowing and cough are simultaneously disordered following stroke. To date, there is a
treatment that targets both swallowing and cough function in stroke patients.
Expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) increases expiratory muscle strength (Baker et
al., 2005) and there is evidence that supports its use to improve both swallow and cough
functions in patients with Parkinson's disease (Troche et al., in press). This cross-system,
device-driven approach to rehabilitating multiple contributors to airway protection deficits
is highly desirable in the stroke population due to the likelihood of the co-occurrence of
both swallow and cough disorders. To date, EMST has not been tested in stroke patients. We
propose that by including cough in the screening, evaluation and treatment processes for
disorders of airway protection, we will be able to better identify and treat patients most
at risk for airway compromise and associated sequelae.
Research Design and Methods This pilot study will include twenty acute (1-14 days
post-ictus) and subacute (14 days - 6 months post-ictus) ischemic stroke patients between
the ages of 50 and 80 as participants. Once enrolled, participants will complete a battery
of pre-training baseline measures ('measures' subheading below) and then be randomized to
one of two groups: the experimental EMST group, or the control group. The training (EMST
group) or control period will last for 5 weeks, and there will then be a post-training
assessment that will consist of the same measures that were taken during the initial
baseline visit.
Once informed consent is obtained, medical records will be reviewed for confirmation that
the patient meets inclusion and exclusion criteria. Cognitive status: Cognitive status in
stroke brain injured patients is known to impact recovery and relate to dysphagia, risk of
aspiration, and cough. We will use the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
assess stroke severity (Appendix 1). The NIHSS will be treated as an independent predictor
of cough and/or swallow dysfunction.
Measures
Maximum Expiratory Pressure: Maximum expiratory (MEP) pressures are an indirect measure of
expiratory muscle strength. The measurement apparatus consists of a mouthpiece connected to
a pressure manometer by 50 cm of 2 mm i.d. tubing with a 14-gauge-needle air-leak. In order
to measure MEP, the participant will be seated with the nose occluded with nose clips. After
inhaling to total lung capacity, the participant will place his or her lips around the
mouthpiece and blow out as forcefully as possible. Repeated measures will be taken with a
one to two minute rest between trials, until three measurements obtained are within 5%. The
average of these three values will be recorded.
Lung function test: Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Force Expiratory Volume at one second
(FEV1): The participants will be asked to breathe in to their total lung capacity. The
participants will then be asked to blow out as forcefully as possible into a computerized
spirometer. FEV1 is a measure of expiratory volume during the first second of expiration
during the forced vital capacity maneuver. Alternatively, if the subject is unable to
perform the cognitive voluntary spirometric task, upper airway respiratory resistance (R5)
will be measured with impulse oscillometry (IOS, Jaeger Instruments). Impulse oscillometry
requires the participant to breath through a mouthpiece connected to the computer. The
mouthpiece apparatus delivers small puffs of air whose reverberations provide measures of
upper and lower airway resistance. This takes approximately 5-10 minutes to complete.
Cough: Participants will be instrumented for the measurement of the respiratory airflow
pattern during spontaneous breathing, voluntary cough and capsaicin induced reflex cough. A
facemask connected to a pneumotachograph will be used to record the airflow and expiratory
muscle activity will be measured with surface electromyography (sEMG), with electrodes
placed over the rectus abdominus muscle, and over the 8th intercostal space. The mouth
airflow signal and sEMG signal will be digitized and recorded on a desktop computer (Chart,
ADInstruments, Inc). The computer signals will be analyzed to determine timing and duration
of the inspiratory, expiratory and compression phases, as well as the peak and mean
expiratory airflow of each cough (Figure 4), and associated sEMG amplitude measures. Because
it has been recently reported that acute stroke related brain injury differentially affects
the motor pattern of voluntary and reflex elicited coughs (Ward et al., 2010), hence it is
essential to elicit coughs with both peripheral afferent stimulation (capsaicin; 'reflexive'
cough) and voluntary induced cough.
Voluntary cough: Participants will be seated with a facemask connected to a
pneumotachograph. They will be instructed to produce a strong cough three times into the
facemask. They will rest for one minute between trials. This will take 5 - 10 minutes to
complete.
Reflexive cough / capsaicin administration: After the participant is instrumented with
facemask, he/she will be seated comfortably in a chair in front of an airflow fume hood. The
airflow fume hood prevents exposure of the participant and experimenter to the nebulized
solution except when the participant inhales for the capsaicin challenge. Participants will
inspire deeply through the nebulizer (containing the capsaicin or a vehicle solution)
coupled to the facemask and pneumotachograph. The outflow nebulizer gas will be passed
through an isopropyl alcohol solution to remove capsaicin from the air vented into the fume
hood. Dr. Davenport holds an FDA IND # 76866 for the use of capsaicin in the study of cough
motor pattern. This will take 10 minutes to complete.
Swallowing Evaluation: Videofluoroscopic measures: Swallowing will be assessed using a high
resolution, dual modality videofluoroscopic (VFS) recording device with signal acquisition
(digitized at 250 Hz) and digital storage and retrieval of respiratory and swallowing data
(Digital Swallowing Workstation, model 7100, Lincoln Park, NJ: Kay Elemetrics). The clinical
swallow examination comprises: a brief swallowing history, an oral motor examination, a 3 oz
swallowing test, and a Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Examination (VFSE). The oral motor
examination assesses the strength, timing and tone of jaw, lips, face, larynx and
velopharynx as these structures all contribute to safe, adequate swallowing. Their
impairment is predictive of swallowing abnormality. The 3 oz swallow test, requires each
person to swallow three ounces of water. It is also strongly associated with aspiration on
instrumental testing. The VFSE includes videotaping the participant in the radiologic suite
(Shands radiology department) using standard fluoroscopic systems with remote monitor and a
standard lateral view of the oropharynx. This lateral view will allow visualization of all
critical oral and pharyngeal structures, including jaw, lips, tongue, soft palate, larynx
and pharynx. A video counter will imprint a time code on each examination to aid subsequent
analysis. Each examination will consist of 6, 5-ml and 10-ml thin liquid swallows, 3, 15-ml
thin liquid swallows, 6, 5-ml and 10-ml swallows of barium pudding, and one, 3oz thin
liquid. Standardized "bail-out" criteria will be used to eliminate serious aspiration.
The Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImp™) will be used to analyze the VFS
recordings and determine the presence of oral and/or pharyngeal swallowing impairment. The
MBSImp is a validated tool (B. Martin-Harris et al., 2008) for assessing swallow impairment.
Six objective components of oral and pharyngeal impairment are included on the scoring form,
thus giving an overall impression of swallowing performance.
The penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) (Rosenbek, Robbins, Roecker, Coyle, & Wood, 1996)
will be used to assess penetration or aspiration; the PAS is an 8-point scale that ranges
from 1 (no penetration/aspiration) to 8 (aspiration with no cough response).
EMST training procedures As indicated in the Informed Consent Form, after completion of the
baseline testing, participants will be randomized to either an experimental EMST group, or a
control group. Participants in both groups will follow any compensatory strategies,
including diet modifications and/or postural adjustments recommended for safe swallowing
based on the initial swallowing examination. In addition, the EMST group will receive 5
weeks of EMST.
1. The EMST group will be given an expiratory pressure threshold trainer, which consists
of plexiglass tube with a variable tension spring controlling a "pop-off" valve. The
threshold training device used in this study will be a modification of a commercially
available device manufactured by HealthScan, Inc. The modification of this device
allows the pressure threshold to be set up to 160 cmH20. The current device only allows
pressure threshold settings up to 20 cmH20. The higher pressure-threshold settings are
necessary to allow the threshold to be set at 75% of the participant's MEP.
2. The training protocol will consist of five sets of five breaths, five days per week for
5 weeks with the pressure threshold set at 75% of the participant's most recently
acquired MEP. The EMST participants will be provided with written (Appendix 2) and
verbal instructions for the completion of the training protocol. Participants will mark
the completion of training sets on a log sheet (Appendix 3) each week.
3. Each EMST participant will be visited at their home by a trained therapist once a week
during each week of the 5 week training period. The participant's MEP will be measured
at this time. Three trials will be completed. The maximum value will be used in the
dataset. Any participant concerns regarding the training program will be addressed at
this time.
4. Following the training period, all of the baseline measures described above for
breathing, coughing, and swallowing will be re-evaluated. This will constitute the
post-training baseline measures and will occur within one following the 5-week
intervention
Control group procedures:
As indicated in the Informed Consent Form, after completion of the baseline testing,
participants will be randomized to either an experimental EMST group, or a control group.
Participants randomized to the control group will not be involved in any EMST treatment
paradigm or any other exercise treatment paradigm, but as with the EMST group, participants
may be using compensatory strategies as per standard of care. This will ensure they are able
to safely maintain adequate nutritional status. Participants in this group will be assessed
at the pre-training and post-training visits using the identical protocol for that of the
EMST group. They will not receive weekly home visits.
post-ictus) and subacute (14 days - 6 months post-ictus) ischemic stroke patients between
the ages of 50 and 80 as participants. Once enrolled, participants will complete a battery
of pre-training baseline measures ('measures' subheading below) and then be randomized to
one of two groups: the experimental EMST group, or the control group. The training (EMST
group) or control period will last for 5 weeks, and there will then be a post-training
assessment that will consist of the same measures that were taken during the initial
baseline visit.
Once informed consent is obtained, medical records will be reviewed for confirmation that
the patient meets inclusion and exclusion criteria. Cognitive status: Cognitive status in
stroke brain injured patients is known to impact recovery and relate to dysphagia, risk of
aspiration, and cough. We will use the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
assess stroke severity (Appendix 1). The NIHSS will be treated as an independent predictor
of cough and/or swallow dysfunction.
Measures
Maximum Expiratory Pressure: Maximum expiratory (MEP) pressures are an indirect measure of
expiratory muscle strength. The measurement apparatus consists of a mouthpiece connected to
a pressure manometer by 50 cm of 2 mm i.d. tubing with a 14-gauge-needle air-leak. In order
to measure MEP, the participant will be seated with the nose occluded with nose clips. After
inhaling to total lung capacity, the participant will place his or her lips around the
mouthpiece and blow out as forcefully as possible. Repeated measures will be taken with a
one to two minute rest between trials, until three measurements obtained are within 5%. The
average of these three values will be recorded.
Lung function test: Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Force Expiratory Volume at one second
(FEV1): The participants will be asked to breathe in to their total lung capacity. The
participants will then be asked to blow out as forcefully as possible into a computerized
spirometer. FEV1 is a measure of expiratory volume during the first second of expiration
during the forced vital capacity maneuver. Alternatively, if the subject is unable to
perform the cognitive voluntary spirometric task, upper airway respiratory resistance (R5)
will be measured with impulse oscillometry (IOS, Jaeger Instruments). Impulse oscillometry
requires the participant to breath through a mouthpiece connected to the computer. The
mouthpiece apparatus delivers small puffs of air whose reverberations provide measures of
upper and lower airway resistance. This takes approximately 5-10 minutes to complete.
Cough: Participants will be instrumented for the measurement of the respiratory airflow
pattern during spontaneous breathing, voluntary cough and capsaicin induced reflex cough. A
facemask connected to a pneumotachograph will be used to record the airflow and expiratory
muscle activity will be measured with surface electromyography (sEMG), with electrodes
placed over the rectus abdominus muscle, and over the 8th intercostal space. The mouth
airflow signal and sEMG signal will be digitized and recorded on a desktop computer (Chart,
ADInstruments, Inc). The computer signals will be analyzed to determine timing and duration
of the inspiratory, expiratory and compression phases, as well as the peak and mean
expiratory airflow of each cough (Figure 4), and associated sEMG amplitude measures. Because
it has been recently reported that acute stroke related brain injury differentially affects
the motor pattern of voluntary and reflex elicited coughs (Ward et al., 2010), hence it is
essential to elicit coughs with both peripheral afferent stimulation (capsaicin; 'reflexive'
cough) and voluntary induced cough.
Voluntary cough: Participants will be seated with a facemask connected to a
pneumotachograph. They will be instructed to produce a strong cough three times into the
facemask. They will rest for one minute between trials. This will take 5 - 10 minutes to
complete.
Reflexive cough / capsaicin administration: After the participant is instrumented with
facemask, he/she will be seated comfortably in a chair in front of an airflow fume hood. The
airflow fume hood prevents exposure of the participant and experimenter to the nebulized
solution except when the participant inhales for the capsaicin challenge. Participants will
inspire deeply through the nebulizer (containing the capsaicin or a vehicle solution)
coupled to the facemask and pneumotachograph. The outflow nebulizer gas will be passed
through an isopropyl alcohol solution to remove capsaicin from the air vented into the fume
hood. Dr. Davenport holds an FDA IND # 76866 for the use of capsaicin in the study of cough
motor pattern. This will take 10 minutes to complete.
Swallowing Evaluation: Videofluoroscopic measures: Swallowing will be assessed using a high
resolution, dual modality videofluoroscopic (VFS) recording device with signal acquisition
(digitized at 250 Hz) and digital storage and retrieval of respiratory and swallowing data
(Digital Swallowing Workstation, model 7100, Lincoln Park, NJ: Kay Elemetrics). The clinical
swallow examination comprises: a brief swallowing history, an oral motor examination, a 3 oz
swallowing test, and a Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Examination (VFSE). The oral motor
examination assesses the strength, timing and tone of jaw, lips, face, larynx and
velopharynx as these structures all contribute to safe, adequate swallowing. Their
impairment is predictive of swallowing abnormality. The 3 oz swallow test, requires each
person to swallow three ounces of water. It is also strongly associated with aspiration on
instrumental testing. The VFSE includes videotaping the participant in the radiologic suite
(Shands radiology department) using standard fluoroscopic systems with remote monitor and a
standard lateral view of the oropharynx. This lateral view will allow visualization of all
critical oral and pharyngeal structures, including jaw, lips, tongue, soft palate, larynx
and pharynx. A video counter will imprint a time code on each examination to aid subsequent
analysis. Each examination will consist of 6, 5-ml and 10-ml thin liquid swallows, 3, 15-ml
thin liquid swallows, 6, 5-ml and 10-ml swallows of barium pudding, and one, 3oz thin
liquid. Standardized "bail-out" criteria will be used to eliminate serious aspiration.
The Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImp™) will be used to analyze the VFS
recordings and determine the presence of oral and/or pharyngeal swallowing impairment. The
MBSImp is a validated tool (B. Martin-Harris et al., 2008) for assessing swallow impairment.
Six objective components of oral and pharyngeal impairment are included on the scoring form,
thus giving an overall impression of swallowing performance.
The penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) (Rosenbek, Robbins, Roecker, Coyle, & Wood, 1996)
will be used to assess penetration or aspiration; the PAS is an 8-point scale that ranges
from 1 (no penetration/aspiration) to 8 (aspiration with no cough response).
EMST training procedures As indicated in the Informed Consent Form, after completion of the
baseline testing, participants will be randomized to either an experimental EMST group, or a
control group. Participants in both groups will follow any compensatory strategies,
including diet modifications and/or postural adjustments recommended for safe swallowing
based on the initial swallowing examination. In addition, the EMST group will receive 5
weeks of EMST.
1. The EMST group will be given an expiratory pressure threshold trainer, which consists
of plexiglass tube with a variable tension spring controlling a "pop-off" valve. The
threshold training device used in this study will be a modification of a commercially
available device manufactured by HealthScan, Inc. The modification of this device
allows the pressure threshold to be set up to 160 cmH20. The current device only allows
pressure threshold settings up to 20 cmH20. The higher pressure-threshold settings are
necessary to allow the threshold to be set at 75% of the participant's MEP.
2. The training protocol will consist of five sets of five breaths, five days per week for
5 weeks with the pressure threshold set at 75% of the participant's most recently
acquired MEP. The EMST participants will be provided with written (Appendix 2) and
verbal instructions for the completion of the training protocol. Participants will mark
the completion of training sets on a log sheet (Appendix 3) each week.
3. Each EMST participant will be visited at their home by a trained therapist once a week
during each week of the 5 week training period. The participant's MEP will be measured
at this time. Three trials will be completed. The maximum value will be used in the
dataset. Any participant concerns regarding the training program will be addressed at
this time.
4. Following the training period, all of the baseline measures described above for
breathing, coughing, and swallowing will be re-evaluated. This will constitute the
post-training baseline measures and will occur within one following the 5-week
intervention
Control group procedures:
As indicated in the Informed Consent Form, after completion of the baseline testing,
participants will be randomized to either an experimental EMST group, or a control group.
Participants randomized to the control group will not be involved in any EMST treatment
paradigm or any other exercise treatment paradigm, but as with the EMST group, participants
may be using compensatory strategies as per standard of care. This will ensure they are able
to safely maintain adequate nutritional status. Participants in this group will be assessed
at the pre-training and post-training visits using the identical protocol for that of the
EMST group. They will not receive weekly home visits.
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Acute (0-14 days) and subacute (14 days - 6 months) ischemic stroke
2. Neurologic status permits participation.
3. Medical status permits participation.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Dysphagia secondary to something other than stroke.
2. Refuses consent.
3. Incapable of informed consent and has no representative.
4. Multiple strokes and previous history of dysphagia secondary to stroke.
5. Longer than 6 months post-stroke
6. Known cardiac valve thrombosis
7. Stroke etiology of dissection
8. Unstable / evolving stroke lesion.
9. History of cancer in the head or neck
10. History of radiation to the head or neck
11. History of degenerative disease
We found this trial at
2
sites
University of Florida The University of Florida (UF) is a major, public, comprehensive, land-grant, research...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials