Comparison of Incidence Between Two Techniques
| Status: | Completed |
|---|---|
| Conditions: | Hospital |
| Therapuetic Areas: | Other |
| Healthy: | No |
| Age Range: | 18 - Any |
| Updated: | 9/26/2018 |
| Start Date: | March 2013 |
| End Date: | December 2016 |
Comparison of the Intraoperative, Postoperative Complications and Patient's Discomfort Involving External and Internal Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Techniques With Simultaneous Implant Placement: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Sinus augmentation, also referred to as a sinus lift or a sinus graft, is an oral surgery
procedure where bone is added to the upper jaw near the molars. The goal of the surgery is to
add enough bone material onto the upper jaw to support the placement of a dental implant. The
augmentation and the dental implant placement will be done at the same time to avoid the need
for two surgeries. This is standard of care.
The purpose of this study is to compare any problems and patient comfort levels following
surgery. Subjects will be randomly placed into one of two groups: the internal lift group or
the external lift group. Both types of surgery are routinely done at our clinic. Usually the
type of procedure (internal or external) is based on the dentist's preference. Investigators
are doing this study to compare them to each other to see if one is more comfortable for the
subject than the other or if they are equal. It is predicted that the two techniques may
differ when it comes to complications during the procedure, patient discomfort following the
procedure and patient complications in the weeks and months after the procedure. This last
comparison has not yet been studied, and surgeons often choose the technique that they prefer
from their own experiences. With this research study researchers hope to gain valuable
information that will help surgeons' decisions in the future.
- Investigators hypothesize that external sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant
placement (external technique) will have a higher rate of Schneiderian membrane
perforation than the internal sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement
(internal technique).
- Investigators hypothesize that the internal technique is associated with more discomfort
for the subject compared with the external technique.
- Investigators hypothesize that the external technique will result in more severe
pain/bleeding/swelling than the internal technique.
- Investigators hypothesize that the internal technique has a higher incidence of
complications that occur between three weeks and three months postoperatively compared
with the external technique.
- Investigators hypothesize that the external technique has a higher amount of analgesics
taken postoperatively compared with the internal technique
procedure where bone is added to the upper jaw near the molars. The goal of the surgery is to
add enough bone material onto the upper jaw to support the placement of a dental implant. The
augmentation and the dental implant placement will be done at the same time to avoid the need
for two surgeries. This is standard of care.
The purpose of this study is to compare any problems and patient comfort levels following
surgery. Subjects will be randomly placed into one of two groups: the internal lift group or
the external lift group. Both types of surgery are routinely done at our clinic. Usually the
type of procedure (internal or external) is based on the dentist's preference. Investigators
are doing this study to compare them to each other to see if one is more comfortable for the
subject than the other or if they are equal. It is predicted that the two techniques may
differ when it comes to complications during the procedure, patient discomfort following the
procedure and patient complications in the weeks and months after the procedure. This last
comparison has not yet been studied, and surgeons often choose the technique that they prefer
from their own experiences. With this research study researchers hope to gain valuable
information that will help surgeons' decisions in the future.
- Investigators hypothesize that external sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant
placement (external technique) will have a higher rate of Schneiderian membrane
perforation than the internal sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement
(internal technique).
- Investigators hypothesize that the internal technique is associated with more discomfort
for the subject compared with the external technique.
- Investigators hypothesize that the external technique will result in more severe
pain/bleeding/swelling than the internal technique.
- Investigators hypothesize that the internal technique has a higher incidence of
complications that occur between three weeks and three months postoperatively compared
with the external technique.
- Investigators hypothesize that the external technique has a higher amount of analgesics
taken postoperatively compared with the internal technique
Experimental Design
The proposed study design is a single site, double armed, randomized clinical trial. Subjects
will be those whose diagnosis requires restoring the lateral maxillary edentulous area by
performing sinus augmentation together with implant placement.
Sample Size and Statistical Analysis Sample size A number of 46 subjects, 23 per each group,
who meet study inclusion and exclusion criteria, will be treated for this study to allow for
a dropout rate of up to 15%. Up to 60 subjects will be consented to reach the research goal
of 46.
The sample size was determined using nQuery program (version 7.0) - for a power of 80% with
20 subjects/group, assuming the anticipated values for the Schneiderian membrane rate
perforation as 55% (8) for the external procedure and 10% for the internal procedure (9),
based on previously reported studies for each procedure.
Randomization Randomization will be performed in a 1:1 ratio using a balanced design based on
a computer-generated randomization scheme. A printout of this scheme will be used by the
co-investigator which will have the randomization for each subject that qualifies in the
order of qualification. Randomization will occur the day of surgery.
Blinding Due to the nature of the procedures, this study will not be blinded.
Subject Characteristics Subjects will include patients whose diagnosis requires restoring the
lateral maxillary edentulous area by performing sinus augmentation together with implant
placement.
The proposed study design is a single site, double armed, randomized clinical trial. Subjects
will be those whose diagnosis requires restoring the lateral maxillary edentulous area by
performing sinus augmentation together with implant placement.
Sample Size and Statistical Analysis Sample size A number of 46 subjects, 23 per each group,
who meet study inclusion and exclusion criteria, will be treated for this study to allow for
a dropout rate of up to 15%. Up to 60 subjects will be consented to reach the research goal
of 46.
The sample size was determined using nQuery program (version 7.0) - for a power of 80% with
20 subjects/group, assuming the anticipated values for the Schneiderian membrane rate
perforation as 55% (8) for the external procedure and 10% for the internal procedure (9),
based on previously reported studies for each procedure.
Randomization Randomization will be performed in a 1:1 ratio using a balanced design based on
a computer-generated randomization scheme. A printout of this scheme will be used by the
co-investigator which will have the randomization for each subject that qualifies in the
order of qualification. Randomization will occur the day of surgery.
Blinding Due to the nature of the procedures, this study will not be blinded.
Subject Characteristics Subjects will include patients whose diagnosis requires restoring the
lateral maxillary edentulous area by performing sinus augmentation together with implant
placement.
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- patients treatment planned for sinus lift augmentation and implant placement, with a
height of the crestal alveolar bone measured in the middle of the edentulous space
between four and six mm (calibrated measurements recorded on existing panoramic
radiograph)
- the length of the edentulous span is one or two teeth
- non-smokers
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients who have had a previous sinus lift augmentation procedure
- pathology present within the sinus (sinusitis, polyps, neoplasia, mucoceles, etc.) or
any deformity/radiation therapy to the sinus
- medically compromised patients contraindicated to dental surgery at TUSDM periodontal
clinic including uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c ≥7, lab results from within the past 6
months will be reviewed, patient without lab results from within the past 6 months
will be excluded) and/or uncontrolled hypertension (more than stage II, ≥160/110)
- patients with medical condition that could potentially affect wound healing (e.g.,
self-reported Hepatitis B or C, self-reported HIV)
- patients with metabolic bone disease such as Paget's Disease or osteoporosis
- patients who are currently taking bisphosphonates or steroids
- patients who are currently pregnant according to self-report (standard of care in the
TUSDM Periodontology clinic for such procedures)
- current smokers
We found this trial at
1
site
Click here to add this to my saved trials
