Combined Treatment for Mixed Incontinence
Status: | Completed |
---|---|
Conditions: | Urology |
Therapuetic Areas: | Nephrology / Urology |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 21 - Any |
Updated: | 5/4/2018 |
Start Date: | October 2013 |
End Date: | October 2017 |
Effects of Surgical Treatment Enhanced With Exercise for Mixed Urinary Incontinence (ESTEEM)
The overarching goal of this randomized trial is to estimate the effect of combined
midurethral sling (MUS) and peri-operative behavioral/pelvic floor therapy (BPTx) compared to
MUS alone on successful treatment of MUI symptoms in 472 women. Secondary objectives include
estimating the effect of combined treatment compared to MUS on improving overactive bladder
(OAB) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) outcomes separately, need for additional
treatment, time to failure and identifying predictors of poor outcomes in this MUI
population.
A supplemental study, The Human Microbiome Study of ESTEEM, will evaluate the urinary and
vaginal microbiome as it relates to women with MUI, their treatment and unaffected controls.
midurethral sling (MUS) and peri-operative behavioral/pelvic floor therapy (BPTx) compared to
MUS alone on successful treatment of MUI symptoms in 472 women. Secondary objectives include
estimating the effect of combined treatment compared to MUS on improving overactive bladder
(OAB) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) outcomes separately, need for additional
treatment, time to failure and identifying predictors of poor outcomes in this MUI
population.
A supplemental study, The Human Microbiome Study of ESTEEM, will evaluate the urinary and
vaginal microbiome as it relates to women with MUI, their treatment and unaffected controls.
ESTEEM is a multi-center randomized trial of 472 women with MUI who have elected to undergo
surgical treatment for SUI. Participants will be randomized to a peri-operative BPTx
program+MUS versus MUS alone. The purpose is to compare combined MUS+BPTx versus MUS alone
(control) on improving MUI symptoms at 1 year.
Patients will be assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Randomization will be
stratified by clinical site and by UUI "severity," which will be defined by the number of
urgency urinary IEs on diary.
The primary outcome for this study is the mean change from baseline in UDI-total score at 1
year postoperative. The UDI is a validated, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome (PRO)
measure.
Secondary outcomes UUI/OAB outcomes will be measured using the UDI-irritative subscale that
measures symptom burden, impact, and changes related to OAB. It is highly responsive to
treatment-related change and is able to discriminate among levels of change in all bladder
diary variables (urinary urgency, frequency and urge incontinence) and patient ratings of
treatment benefit that will characterize how MUS may affect all OAB symptoms individually and
as a whole. SUI symptom outcomes will be measured using the UDI-stress subscale to compare
SUI outcomes between women randomized to MUS + BPTx versus MUS alone.
Other UUI/OAB outcomes that will be compared between groups include 1) the change in IE
frequency and type, number of urgency episodes, urgency severity with voids, number of
diurnal voids, and number of nocturnal voids using a bladder diary; 2) patient satisfaction
with treatment using the OAB-SAT-q; 3) bother and heal related quality of life using the
OAB-q subscale
For analyzing time to failure, "failure" will be defined as initiation of any additional
treatment for either SUI or UUI/OAB symptoms during the follow-up period. Subjects lost to
follow up will be censored at the time of their last visit.
Quality of life/global impression will be assessed be compared between treatment groups using
the a) Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence
Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ), c) European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), d) Adaptation
Index and e) Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) and Patient Global Impression
of Severity (PGI-S).
Safety/additional treatments will be characterized as a) additional re-treatments for SUI or
UUI within 12 months of treatment, and type of re-treatment and b) return to OR for sling
revision due to worsened OAB symptoms.
To evaluate the association between PFM strength and improvements in UI symptoms, we will
objectively assess PFM strength changes using the Peritron Perineometer, and instrument
specifically designed for pelvic floor assessment.
surgical treatment for SUI. Participants will be randomized to a peri-operative BPTx
program+MUS versus MUS alone. The purpose is to compare combined MUS+BPTx versus MUS alone
(control) on improving MUI symptoms at 1 year.
Patients will be assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Randomization will be
stratified by clinical site and by UUI "severity," which will be defined by the number of
urgency urinary IEs on diary.
The primary outcome for this study is the mean change from baseline in UDI-total score at 1
year postoperative. The UDI is a validated, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome (PRO)
measure.
Secondary outcomes UUI/OAB outcomes will be measured using the UDI-irritative subscale that
measures symptom burden, impact, and changes related to OAB. It is highly responsive to
treatment-related change and is able to discriminate among levels of change in all bladder
diary variables (urinary urgency, frequency and urge incontinence) and patient ratings of
treatment benefit that will characterize how MUS may affect all OAB symptoms individually and
as a whole. SUI symptom outcomes will be measured using the UDI-stress subscale to compare
SUI outcomes between women randomized to MUS + BPTx versus MUS alone.
Other UUI/OAB outcomes that will be compared between groups include 1) the change in IE
frequency and type, number of urgency episodes, urgency severity with voids, number of
diurnal voids, and number of nocturnal voids using a bladder diary; 2) patient satisfaction
with treatment using the OAB-SAT-q; 3) bother and heal related quality of life using the
OAB-q subscale
For analyzing time to failure, "failure" will be defined as initiation of any additional
treatment for either SUI or UUI/OAB symptoms during the follow-up period. Subjects lost to
follow up will be censored at the time of their last visit.
Quality of life/global impression will be assessed be compared between treatment groups using
the a) Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence
Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ), c) European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), d) Adaptation
Index and e) Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) and Patient Global Impression
of Severity (PGI-S).
Safety/additional treatments will be characterized as a) additional re-treatments for SUI or
UUI within 12 months of treatment, and type of re-treatment and b) return to OR for sling
revision due to worsened OAB symptoms.
To evaluate the association between PFM strength and improvements in UI symptoms, we will
objectively assess PFM strength changes using the Peritron Perineometer, and instrument
specifically designed for pelvic floor assessment.
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Presence of both SUI and UUI on bladder diary; and > 2 IEs/3 days
1. > 1 Stress IE/3 day diary
2. > 1 Urge IE/3 day diary
2. Reporting at least "moderate bother" from UUI item on the UDI "Do you usually
experience urine leakage associated with a feeling of urgency, that is a strong
sensation of needing to go to the bathroom?"
3. Reporting at least "moderate bother" from SUI item on UDI "Do you usually experience
urine leakage related to coughing, sneezing, or laughing"
4. Diagnosis of SUI defined by a positive cough stress test (CST) or urodynamic
evaluation within the past 18 months
5. Desires surgical treatment for SUI symptoms
6. Urinary symptoms >3 months
7. Subjects understand that BPTx is a treatment option for MUI outside of ESTEEM study
protocol
8. Urodynamics within past 18 months
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Anterior or apical compartment prolapse at or beyond the hymen (>0 on POPQ),
regardless if patient is symptomatic
a)Women with anterior or apical prolapse above the hymen (<0) who do not report
vaginal bulge symptoms will be eligible
2. Planned concomitant surgery for anterior vaginal wall or apical prolapse > 0
a)Women undergoing only rectocele repair are eligible
3. Women undergoing hysterectomy for any indication will be excluded
4. Active pelvic organ malignancy
5. Age <21 years
6. Pregnant or plans for future pregnancy in next 12 months, or within 12 months
post-partum
7. Post-void residual >150 cc on 2 occasions, or current catheter use
8. Participation in other trial that may influence results of this study
9. Unevaluated hematuria
10. Prior sling, synthetic mesh for prolapse, implanted nerve stimulator for incontinence
11. Spinal cord injury or advanced/severe neurologic conditions including Multiple
Sclerosis, Parkinsons
12. Women on anti-muscarinic therapy will be eligible after 3 week wash-out period
13. Non-ambulatory
14. History of serious adverse reaction to synthetic mesh
15. Not able to complete study assessments per clinician judgment, or not available for 12
month follow-up
16. Women who only report "other IE" on bladder diary, and do not report at minimum 1
stress and 1 urge IE/3 days
17. Diagnosis of and/or history of bladder pain or chronic pelvic pain
18. Women who had intravesical Botox injection within the past 12 months
We found this trial at
10
sites
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131
Principal Investigator: Gena Dunivan, MD
Phone: 505-272-6826
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Birmingham, Alabama 35249
Principal Investigator: Holly Richter, PhD, MD
Phone: 205-975-8522
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Principal Investigator: Matthew Barber, MD
Phone: 216-445-5505
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Downey, California 90242
Principal Investigator: John N Nguyen, MD
Phone: 562-657-4464
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Durham, North Carolina 27707
Principal Investigator: Alison Weidner, MD
Phone: 919-401-1018
Click here to add this to my saved trials

La Jolla, California 92037
Principal Investigator: Emily Lukacz, MD
Phone: 858-657-6827
Click here to add this to my saved trials

3451 Walnut St
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
1 (215) 898-5000

Principal Investigator: Ariana Smith, MD
Phone: 215-615-6569
Univ of Pennsylvania Penn has a long and proud tradition of intellectual rigor and pursuit...
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
Principal Investigator: Pam Moalli, MD
Phone: 412-641-5388
Click here to add this to my saved trials

Providence, Rhode Island 02903
Principal Investigator: Vivian Sung, MD
Phone: 401-276-7869
Click here to add this to my saved trials

San Diego, California 92120
Principal Investigator: Shawn A. Menefee, MD
Phone: 619-221-6274
Click here to add this to my saved trials
