Manipulation Under Anesthesia Versus Arthroscopic Capsular Release in the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis
| Status: | Recruiting |
|---|---|
| Conditions: | Arthritis, Orthopedic |
| Therapuetic Areas: | Rheumatology, Orthopedics / Podiatry |
| Healthy: | No |
| Age Range: | 18 - 75 |
| Updated: | 5/9/2018 |
| Start Date: | November 2013 |
| End Date: | December 2019 |
| Contact: | Akin Cil, MD |
| Email: | akin.cil@tmcmed.org |
| Phone: | 816-404-5404 |
Manipulation Under Anesthesia Versus Arthroscopic Capsular Release in the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Comparison.
Shoulder pain is one of the most common causes of musculoskeletal disability in the adult
population. Adhesive capsulitis is one of a multitude of reasons that can cause shoulder pain
and dysfunction. It is a painful and disabling condition that can cause frustration for
patients and caregivers due to slow recovery time. It is important to meticulously diagnose
the source of the symptoms. Adhesive capsulitis is treatment by non-operative therapies such
as physical therapy, exercise, steroids & pain medications. For some patients a quicker
return to function is necessary; in th is situation an operative treatment is an option. This
study will compare two surgical techniques for adhesive capsulitis.
Purpose
1. To directly compare outcomes of patients with adhesive capsulitis who have failed pain
management and failed improvement in range of motion after at least 3 months of
supervised, regimented conservative treatment and have subsequently been randomized to
either closed manipulation under anesthesia or arthroscopic capsular release.
2. To blind both patient and assessing physician/nurse study coordinator to the treatment
that was received for the duration of the study. This will reduce the effect of any
potential bias on the results as much as possible.
3. To collect outcome data, both subjectively from the patient using proven outcome
measures, and objectively from regularly spaced follow up visits with blinded assessors.
4. To collect and comment on data from the two treatment groups regarding duration of
post-operative narcotic use, duration of post-operative physical therapy required,
post-operative pain levels, and elapsed time until back to work/activity
post-operatively.
population. Adhesive capsulitis is one of a multitude of reasons that can cause shoulder pain
and dysfunction. It is a painful and disabling condition that can cause frustration for
patients and caregivers due to slow recovery time. It is important to meticulously diagnose
the source of the symptoms. Adhesive capsulitis is treatment by non-operative therapies such
as physical therapy, exercise, steroids & pain medications. For some patients a quicker
return to function is necessary; in th is situation an operative treatment is an option. This
study will compare two surgical techniques for adhesive capsulitis.
Purpose
1. To directly compare outcomes of patients with adhesive capsulitis who have failed pain
management and failed improvement in range of motion after at least 3 months of
supervised, regimented conservative treatment and have subsequently been randomized to
either closed manipulation under anesthesia or arthroscopic capsular release.
2. To blind both patient and assessing physician/nurse study coordinator to the treatment
that was received for the duration of the study. This will reduce the effect of any
potential bias on the results as much as possible.
3. To collect outcome data, both subjectively from the patient using proven outcome
measures, and objectively from regularly spaced follow up visits with blinded assessors.
4. To collect and comment on data from the two treatment groups regarding duration of
post-operative narcotic use, duration of post-operative physical therapy required,
post-operative pain levels, and elapsed time until back to work/activity
post-operatively.
Shoulder pain is one of the most common causes of musculoskeletal disability in the adult
population. Adhesive capsulitis is one of a multitude of pathologic entities that can cause
shoulder pain and dysfunction. The condition is seen frequently in the clinics of primary
care providers and orthopedic surgeons. Patients who develop adhesive capsulitis will
typically present with complaints of pain and a progressive loss of active and passive motion
of the shoulder.
The disease course of adhesive capsulitis has been extensively studied. Despite this,
controversy remains as to the natural history of the disease. It is generally believed that
adhesive capsulitis is a self-limiting process typically lasting twelve to thirty-six months.
In one retrospective study of 50 patients with 10 year follow up, Miller et al7 found
significant improvement in range of motion and resolution of pain in all patients treated
conservatively. In another study, it was shown that 90% of patients treated with a stretching
exercise program alone reported satisfactory outcomes at a mean follow up of 22 months8. This
would mean that up to 10% of patients suffer from long-term problems. Shaffer et al9,
however, reported that 50% of patients treated nonoperatively still complained of some
residual pain, stiffness, or both at an average follow up of 7 years. Despite evidence that
the disease improves without any intervention, many patients do not want to wait potentially
as long as two to three years for resolution. For these patients, it is not unreasonable to
proceed with interventions aimed at resolution of pain and improvement of motion. Levine et
al10 provided some insight into predicting which patients might benefit most from proceeding
with surgery. He found that patients who report more severe symptoms, are younger in age at
symptom onset, and continue to have a reduction in motion after at least four months of
physical therapy were more likely to eventually require surgery.
The course of progression of untreated adhesive capsulitis is described as a continuum of
three clinical phases4. The first phase is characterized by pain and is termed the 'freezing'
phase. In this phase, patients experience a gradual onset of diffuse shoulder pain that is
progressive over a course of weeks to months. In general, pain will begin before any
restriction of motion. Patients may report pain at night and often relate difficulty sleeping
on the affected side. As use of the arm decreases secondary to pain, stiffness begins to set
in. Phase two is characterized by stiffness and is known as the 'frozen' phase. This phase
may last four to twelve months. Patients will see their pain slowly decrease, however, the
limitation in motion continually increases. Phase three is known as the 'thawing' phase and
may last from five to twenty-six months. This is characterized by resolution of pain and slow
improvement in range of motion. Most authors agree that a longer 'freezing' phase is
associated with a longer 'thawing' phase.
Adhesive capsulitis is initially treated with nonoperative therapies. The goals of
conservative management are control of pain and improvement or maintenance of range of
motion. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications may be prescribed to help control pain.
Physical therapy with or without a home exercise program is always employed. This should be
done in a gentle manner and without causing too much pain. Treatment with oral or injectable
corticosteroids makes theoretical sense given the proven inflammatory nature of the
condition. Studies examining treatment with oral steroids versus placebo or no treatment have
yielded only short-term improvement of a few weeks. No improvement has been shown at
long-term follow up of six to eight months1. There have also been many studies examining the
role of intra-articular steroid injections in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis.
Similarly, these studies have also shown short term (3weeks) improvement in pain and function
but this improvement does not hold up at longer follow up (3-6 months)1. Jones et al11 looked
at the role of suprascapular nerve blocks as a treatment option and found significant
improvement in pain and shoulder range of motion at three months follow up compared to the
group of patients receiving an intra-articular injection of corticosteroid. This suggests a
benefit in the short-term but there is no long-term data to reveal if this improvement is
lasting. Limited investigation has been performed to determine a role for hydrodilation as a
viable treatment option. This involves injection of enough fluid intra-articularly to cause
capsular rupture. No level I studies have been performed and only one level II study has been
done which suggests some improvement in pain and Constant score up to six months1. Closed
Manipulation Under Anesthesia (MUA) has been tested in short and long-term follow up and is
proven to be a beneficial tool in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis in patients who have
failed other nonoperative therapies. In a report on the results of MUA performed for patients
with stage 2 adhesive capsulitis, Dodenhoff et al12 reported that 94% were satisfied with the
procedure at mean follow up of 11 months. In a look at long-term outcomes of MUA, Farrell et
al13 showed improvement in pain and motion that was continued at an average of 15 year follow
up via patient questionnaire. There has been a recent trend toward arthroscopic capsular
release in the treatment of refractory adhesive capsulitis and this treatment option has now
become more popular than MUA. This rise in popularity of arthroscopic capsular release has
occurred because of the perceived benefits of improved outcome and lower risk of
complications even though there have not been any higher level trials comparing the two
options. Ogilvie-Harris et al14, in a level III study, reported on a cohort of his patients
treated with arthroscopic capsular release. He noted that his patients were twice as likely
to be pain free at 2 year follow up as a similar cohort who underwent manipulation under
anesthesia. Pollock et al15 reported in a level IV study, 83% excellent or satisfactory
results after arthroscopic debridement of the rotator interval had been performed
concomitantly with MUA. Warner et al16 was able to demonstrate significant improvement in all
of his patients treated with arthroscopic capsular release who had failed MUA. This level IV
study was performed on patients being treated for postoperative shoulder stiffness, however;
not adhesive capsulitis. Both surgical methods (MUA and arthroscopic capsular release are
used in our practice.
population. Adhesive capsulitis is one of a multitude of pathologic entities that can cause
shoulder pain and dysfunction. The condition is seen frequently in the clinics of primary
care providers and orthopedic surgeons. Patients who develop adhesive capsulitis will
typically present with complaints of pain and a progressive loss of active and passive motion
of the shoulder.
The disease course of adhesive capsulitis has been extensively studied. Despite this,
controversy remains as to the natural history of the disease. It is generally believed that
adhesive capsulitis is a self-limiting process typically lasting twelve to thirty-six months.
In one retrospective study of 50 patients with 10 year follow up, Miller et al7 found
significant improvement in range of motion and resolution of pain in all patients treated
conservatively. In another study, it was shown that 90% of patients treated with a stretching
exercise program alone reported satisfactory outcomes at a mean follow up of 22 months8. This
would mean that up to 10% of patients suffer from long-term problems. Shaffer et al9,
however, reported that 50% of patients treated nonoperatively still complained of some
residual pain, stiffness, or both at an average follow up of 7 years. Despite evidence that
the disease improves without any intervention, many patients do not want to wait potentially
as long as two to three years for resolution. For these patients, it is not unreasonable to
proceed with interventions aimed at resolution of pain and improvement of motion. Levine et
al10 provided some insight into predicting which patients might benefit most from proceeding
with surgery. He found that patients who report more severe symptoms, are younger in age at
symptom onset, and continue to have a reduction in motion after at least four months of
physical therapy were more likely to eventually require surgery.
The course of progression of untreated adhesive capsulitis is described as a continuum of
three clinical phases4. The first phase is characterized by pain and is termed the 'freezing'
phase. In this phase, patients experience a gradual onset of diffuse shoulder pain that is
progressive over a course of weeks to months. In general, pain will begin before any
restriction of motion. Patients may report pain at night and often relate difficulty sleeping
on the affected side. As use of the arm decreases secondary to pain, stiffness begins to set
in. Phase two is characterized by stiffness and is known as the 'frozen' phase. This phase
may last four to twelve months. Patients will see their pain slowly decrease, however, the
limitation in motion continually increases. Phase three is known as the 'thawing' phase and
may last from five to twenty-six months. This is characterized by resolution of pain and slow
improvement in range of motion. Most authors agree that a longer 'freezing' phase is
associated with a longer 'thawing' phase.
Adhesive capsulitis is initially treated with nonoperative therapies. The goals of
conservative management are control of pain and improvement or maintenance of range of
motion. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications may be prescribed to help control pain.
Physical therapy with or without a home exercise program is always employed. This should be
done in a gentle manner and without causing too much pain. Treatment with oral or injectable
corticosteroids makes theoretical sense given the proven inflammatory nature of the
condition. Studies examining treatment with oral steroids versus placebo or no treatment have
yielded only short-term improvement of a few weeks. No improvement has been shown at
long-term follow up of six to eight months1. There have also been many studies examining the
role of intra-articular steroid injections in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis.
Similarly, these studies have also shown short term (3weeks) improvement in pain and function
but this improvement does not hold up at longer follow up (3-6 months)1. Jones et al11 looked
at the role of suprascapular nerve blocks as a treatment option and found significant
improvement in pain and shoulder range of motion at three months follow up compared to the
group of patients receiving an intra-articular injection of corticosteroid. This suggests a
benefit in the short-term but there is no long-term data to reveal if this improvement is
lasting. Limited investigation has been performed to determine a role for hydrodilation as a
viable treatment option. This involves injection of enough fluid intra-articularly to cause
capsular rupture. No level I studies have been performed and only one level II study has been
done which suggests some improvement in pain and Constant score up to six months1. Closed
Manipulation Under Anesthesia (MUA) has been tested in short and long-term follow up and is
proven to be a beneficial tool in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis in patients who have
failed other nonoperative therapies. In a report on the results of MUA performed for patients
with stage 2 adhesive capsulitis, Dodenhoff et al12 reported that 94% were satisfied with the
procedure at mean follow up of 11 months. In a look at long-term outcomes of MUA, Farrell et
al13 showed improvement in pain and motion that was continued at an average of 15 year follow
up via patient questionnaire. There has been a recent trend toward arthroscopic capsular
release in the treatment of refractory adhesive capsulitis and this treatment option has now
become more popular than MUA. This rise in popularity of arthroscopic capsular release has
occurred because of the perceived benefits of improved outcome and lower risk of
complications even though there have not been any higher level trials comparing the two
options. Ogilvie-Harris et al14, in a level III study, reported on a cohort of his patients
treated with arthroscopic capsular release. He noted that his patients were twice as likely
to be pain free at 2 year follow up as a similar cohort who underwent manipulation under
anesthesia. Pollock et al15 reported in a level IV study, 83% excellent or satisfactory
results after arthroscopic debridement of the rotator interval had been performed
concomitantly with MUA. Warner et al16 was able to demonstrate significant improvement in all
of his patients treated with arthroscopic capsular release who had failed MUA. This level IV
study was performed on patients being treated for postoperative shoulder stiffness, however;
not adhesive capsulitis. Both surgical methods (MUA and arthroscopic capsular release are
used in our practice.
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients must be diagnosed as having idiopathic adhesive capsulitis in the 'frozen' or
'thawing' phase of disease and have tried and failed at least 3 months of nonoperative
therapy.
OR
- patient with adhesive capsulitis who presents already in the 'frozen' or 'thawing'
phase who demands a quicker return to function and will not try 3 months of
nonoperative therapy first.
- Age 18 or older
Exclusion Criteria:
- pregnancy
- previously operated shoulder (same side)
- other documented source of shoulder pain and stiffness (same side)
- rotator cuff tear (same side)
- glenohumeral osteoarthritis (same side)
- calcific tendonitis (same side)
- impingement (same side)
- osteonecrosis
- neoplasm
- cervical radiculopathy
- patients who are medically unfit to undergo a general anesthetic
- patients who are unable to comply with the post-operative protocol
- non-English Speaking patients
We found this trial at
1
site
Click here to add this to my saved trials
