Home-based Continuing Care for Young Adults Leaving Residential Substance Abuse Treatment
Status: | Recruiting |
---|---|
Conditions: | Psychiatric |
Therapuetic Areas: | Psychiatry / Psychology |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 19 - Any |
Updated: | 4/21/2016 |
Start Date: | July 2014 |
End Date: | May 2016 |
Contact: | Elena Bresani, MS |
Email: | ebresani@tresearch.org |
Phone: | 215-399-0980 |
Feasibility and Acceptability of Home-based Continuing Care
The purpose of this project is to develop and test a Home-based Continuing Care intervention
that will help parents support the recovery of their Young Adult (YA) child who is leaving
residential substance abuse treatment. The two phase pilot study will 1) interview 50
parents and 50 YAs recruited from residential treatment programs and from parent groups to
inform the development of the intervention and 2) conduct a two-arm pilot study that will
recruit a maximum of 20 parents and their young adult children into one of two conditions
(Home-based Continuing Care [HCC] intervention group or Services as Usual [SAU] comparison
group) with the main goal of determining whether conducting such an intervention is
acceptable and sustainable, and to collect preliminary efficacy data. We hypothesize that
pilot testing will indicate that: (a) HCC is acceptable and potentially sustainable; (b)
conducting a randomized clinical trial is feasible, and (c) the magnitude of outcomes from
HCC will be clinically meaningful.
that will help parents support the recovery of their Young Adult (YA) child who is leaving
residential substance abuse treatment. The two phase pilot study will 1) interview 50
parents and 50 YAs recruited from residential treatment programs and from parent groups to
inform the development of the intervention and 2) conduct a two-arm pilot study that will
recruit a maximum of 20 parents and their young adult children into one of two conditions
(Home-based Continuing Care [HCC] intervention group or Services as Usual [SAU] comparison
group) with the main goal of determining whether conducting such an intervention is
acceptable and sustainable, and to collect preliminary efficacy data. We hypothesize that
pilot testing will indicate that: (a) HCC is acceptable and potentially sustainable; (b)
conducting a randomized clinical trial is feasible, and (c) the magnitude of outcomes from
HCC will be clinically meaningful.
Several models of continuing care (CC) have been studied for adolescents and Young Adults
(YAs) including online relapse prevention, brief telephone counseling and Assertive
Continuing Care (ACC). Five sessions of in-person therapy or brief telephone counseling both
have reduced relapse in youth completing treatment relative to a no CC condition, consistent
with a growing body of research with adults supporting the efficacy of telephone-based CC
(TCC). ACC has been thoroughly evaluated for adolescents. Some applications also have
incorporated contingency management (CM) for engaging in activities including needed
services; but ACC has not applied CM to biologically-verified abstinence -- an efficacious
approach in adult CC. A significant drawback of ACC is that it is quite intensive, requiring
extended clinician training and home visits. This increases the costs of the intervention
and the difficulty of dissemination and implementation; therefore we plan to develop a less
clinician-intensive continuing care model for YAs.
The two phase pilot study will 1) interview 50 parents and 50 YAs recruited from residential
substance abuse treatment programs and from parent groups to inform the development of the
intervention and 2) conduct a two-arm pilot study that will recruit a maximum of 20 parents
and their YA children into one of two conditions (Home-based Continuing Care [HCC]
intervention group or Services as Usual [SAU] comparison group) with the main goal of
determining whether conducting such an intervention is acceptable and sustainable, and to
collect preliminary efficacy data. We hypothesize that pilot testing will indicate that: (a)
HCC is acceptable and potentially sustainable; (b) conducting a randomized clinical trial is
feasible, and (c) the magnitude of outcomes from HCC will be clinically meaningful.
(YAs) including online relapse prevention, brief telephone counseling and Assertive
Continuing Care (ACC). Five sessions of in-person therapy or brief telephone counseling both
have reduced relapse in youth completing treatment relative to a no CC condition, consistent
with a growing body of research with adults supporting the efficacy of telephone-based CC
(TCC). ACC has been thoroughly evaluated for adolescents. Some applications also have
incorporated contingency management (CM) for engaging in activities including needed
services; but ACC has not applied CM to biologically-verified abstinence -- an efficacious
approach in adult CC. A significant drawback of ACC is that it is quite intensive, requiring
extended clinician training and home visits. This increases the costs of the intervention
and the difficulty of dissemination and implementation; therefore we plan to develop a less
clinician-intensive continuing care model for YAs.
The two phase pilot study will 1) interview 50 parents and 50 YAs recruited from residential
substance abuse treatment programs and from parent groups to inform the development of the
intervention and 2) conduct a two-arm pilot study that will recruit a maximum of 20 parents
and their YA children into one of two conditions (Home-based Continuing Care [HCC]
intervention group or Services as Usual [SAU] comparison group) with the main goal of
determining whether conducting such an intervention is acceptable and sustainable, and to
collect preliminary efficacy data. We hypothesize that pilot testing will indicate that: (a)
HCC is acceptable and potentially sustainable; (b) conducting a randomized clinical trial is
feasible, and (c) the magnitude of outcomes from HCC will be clinically meaningful.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Parent is 21 years of age or older
- Young Adult (YA) is 18-25 years of age
- YA's primary drug of abuse is prescription or other opiates
- Parent must be the custodial parent or former guardian or other caretaker of the YA
- YA is in residential treatment
- Parent and YA plan to live in the same residence during the intervention (32 weeks)
- Both Parent and YA provide written informed consent and pass the consent quiz testing
knowledge of basic elements of informed consent and study requirements (including
home urine testing).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Parent currently has a substance use disorder (SUD) as determined via DSM-IV-TR
criteria or a history of SUD and in recovery for less than 2 years
- Parent or YA has been diagnosed as having, or behaves in, a manner consistent with
having significant cognitive impairment (e.g., an unrelieved psychosis or other
serious mental illness)
- YA reports suicidal ideation with a plan, or engaged in suicidal behavior during
residential treatment
- YA has a recent history of severe violence toward the parent (e.g., involving weapons
or hospitalization)
- YA's residential program provides comprehensive continuing services
- YA does not consent to participation within 2 weeks of discharge
We found this trial at
1
site
Click here to add this to my saved trials