Imaging Collaterals in Acute Stroke (iCAS)
Status: | Recruiting |
---|---|
Conditions: | Neurology |
Therapuetic Areas: | Neurology |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 18 - Any |
Updated: | 10/13/2018 |
Start Date: | September 2013 |
End Date: | August 2019 |
Contact: | Gregory Zaharchuk, MD |
Email: | gregz@stanford.edu |
Phone: | 650-723-4448 |
Imaging Collaterals in Acute Stroke
Stroke is caused by a sudden blockage of a blood vessel that delivers blood to the brain.
Unblocking the blood vessel with a blood clot removal device restores blood flow and if done
quickly may prevent the disability that can be caused by a stroke.
However, not all stroke patients benefit from having their blood vessel unblocked.
The aim of this study is to determine if special brain imaging, called MRI, can be used to
identify which stroke patients are most likely to benefit from attempts to unblock their
blood vessel with a special blood clot removal device. In particular, we will assess in this
trial whether a noncontrast MR imaging sequence, arterial spin labeling (ASL), can
demonstrate the presence of collateral blood flow (compared with a gold standard of the
angiogram) and whether it is useful to predict who will benefit from treatment.
Unblocking the blood vessel with a blood clot removal device restores blood flow and if done
quickly may prevent the disability that can be caused by a stroke.
However, not all stroke patients benefit from having their blood vessel unblocked.
The aim of this study is to determine if special brain imaging, called MRI, can be used to
identify which stroke patients are most likely to benefit from attempts to unblock their
blood vessel with a special blood clot removal device. In particular, we will assess in this
trial whether a noncontrast MR imaging sequence, arterial spin labeling (ASL), can
demonstrate the presence of collateral blood flow (compared with a gold standard of the
angiogram) and whether it is useful to predict who will benefit from treatment.
Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) is the standard of care treatment for
stroke patients when treatment can be initiated within 3 hours after symptom onset.
Unfortunately, only a very small fraction of stroke patients is treated with tPA, and
benefits from tPA. This is the result of two main limitations of tPA therapy.
First, the proportion of patients that can be treated with iv tPA is small. Because of the
narrow three hour time-window during which tPA is effective, only patients who arrive to the
hospital early on can be treated with tPA. Most stroke patients, however, arrive at the
hospital after the three-hour time-window and are therefore excluded from tPA treatment.
Second, stroke patients who receive tPA do not always benefit because the treatment does not
restore blood flow in all patients.
Patients with persistent blood vessel occlusions and no improvement in their clinical
condition after receiving tPA or those arriving at the hospital outside the 3 hour time
window routinely undergo mechanical clot removal to open an occluded blood vessel in the
brain.
Mechanical clot removal increases the percentage of stroke patients who achieve
recanalization, and as a result may increase the proportion of patients who have good
clinical outcomes. However it is unclear for which stroke patients mechanical thrombectomy is
most suitable. Although effective at removing blood-clots, it appears that mechanical clot
retrieval is not beneficial for all patients. Whereas some patients benefit, others
experience no effect, and yet others are likely harmed by mechanical clot retrieval. In order
to avoid harm and maximize benefit it is important to know, prior to initiation of the
mechanical clot retrieval procedure, if the procedure is likely to result in a clinical
improvement. We hypothesize that the response to mechanical clot retrieval can be predicted
based on characteristics of an MRI scan obtained just prior to the retrieval procedure. In
particular, this study will assess whether a new non-contrast MR imaging method, arterial
spin labeling (ASL), which measures cerebral blood flow and can give insight into collateral
flow, is effective at predicting who will benefit most from treatment. The investigators hope
to learn if these new MRI techniques can help identify which patients are most likely to
benefit from mechanical clot removal after receiving tPA.
stroke patients when treatment can be initiated within 3 hours after symptom onset.
Unfortunately, only a very small fraction of stroke patients is treated with tPA, and
benefits from tPA. This is the result of two main limitations of tPA therapy.
First, the proportion of patients that can be treated with iv tPA is small. Because of the
narrow three hour time-window during which tPA is effective, only patients who arrive to the
hospital early on can be treated with tPA. Most stroke patients, however, arrive at the
hospital after the three-hour time-window and are therefore excluded from tPA treatment.
Second, stroke patients who receive tPA do not always benefit because the treatment does not
restore blood flow in all patients.
Patients with persistent blood vessel occlusions and no improvement in their clinical
condition after receiving tPA or those arriving at the hospital outside the 3 hour time
window routinely undergo mechanical clot removal to open an occluded blood vessel in the
brain.
Mechanical clot removal increases the percentage of stroke patients who achieve
recanalization, and as a result may increase the proportion of patients who have good
clinical outcomes. However it is unclear for which stroke patients mechanical thrombectomy is
most suitable. Although effective at removing blood-clots, it appears that mechanical clot
retrieval is not beneficial for all patients. Whereas some patients benefit, others
experience no effect, and yet others are likely harmed by mechanical clot retrieval. In order
to avoid harm and maximize benefit it is important to know, prior to initiation of the
mechanical clot retrieval procedure, if the procedure is likely to result in a clinical
improvement. We hypothesize that the response to mechanical clot retrieval can be predicted
based on characteristics of an MRI scan obtained just prior to the retrieval procedure. In
particular, this study will assess whether a new non-contrast MR imaging method, arterial
spin labeling (ASL), which measures cerebral blood flow and can give insight into collateral
flow, is effective at predicting who will benefit most from treatment. The investigators hope
to learn if these new MRI techniques can help identify which patients are most likely to
benefit from mechanical clot removal after receiving tPA.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Age 18 and older
2. Clinical diagnosis of ischemic stroke and an associated score on the NIHSS of 5 or
more points
3. Planned to undergo (or has undergone) intra-arterial (IA) thrombectomy and/or
thrombolysis for acute hemispheric stroke. (Either as primary therapy or as adjuvant
therapy following intravenous tPA treatment)
4. Planned to undergo or has undergone an MR brain scan including MR perfusion imaging
(ASL & bolus PWI) and MR angiography of the circle of Willis prior to IA therapy
5. Intra-arterial thrombectomy can be started within 90 minutes of completion of the MR
perfusion scan and within 24 hours of symptom onset (Start of IA therapy is defined as
the time of insertion of the femoral artery sheath; Time of brain scan is defined as
the time that the scan is completed)
6. Able to obtain informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
1. Any pre-existing illness resulting in a modified Rankin Scale Score of 2 or higher
prior to the qualifying stroke
2. Creatinine clearance < 40 ml/min based on the NIDDK four-variable MDRD method
(non-weight based)
3. Documented allergy to MR contrast agent
4. MRI contraindications (pacemaker, etc.)
5. Pregnancy
We found this trial at
4
sites
4200 Fifth Ave
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
(412) 624-4141
Phone: 412-647-1618
University of Pittsburgh The University of Pittsburgh is a state-related research university, founded as the...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
300 Pasteur Dr
Stanford, California 94305
Stanford, California 94305
(650) 723-4000
Principal Investigator: Gregory Zaharchuk, MD
Stanford Univ Med Ctr The Medical Center is uniquely advantaged by its location on the...
Click here to add this to my saved trials