Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) in Children With No Cochleae or Auditory Nerves
Status: | Recruiting |
---|---|
Conditions: | Other Indications, Other Indications |
Therapuetic Areas: | Other |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | Any - 21 |
Updated: | 7/14/2018 |
Start Date: | May 2014 |
End Date: | May 2020 |
Contact: | Susan B Waltzman, PhD |
Email: | susan.waltzman@nyumc.org |
Phone: | 212-263-8803 |
This study is a feasibility study of the Nucleus 24 ABI in children without NF2. It will be
conducted as a repeated-measures, single subject experiment in order to accommodate the known
variability in cochlear implant clinical results. Data obtained in the course of this study
will be compared with the existing published outcome data from children with normal hearing
and with cochlear implants (CIs). These comparisons may provide additional useful information
about the progress of ABI subjects' performance over time. Also, this may allow the results
of the current study to be utilized to design future pivotal studies of the device in the
pediatric population.
conducted as a repeated-measures, single subject experiment in order to accommodate the known
variability in cochlear implant clinical results. Data obtained in the course of this study
will be compared with the existing published outcome data from children with normal hearing
and with cochlear implants (CIs). These comparisons may provide additional useful information
about the progress of ABI subjects' performance over time. Also, this may allow the results
of the current study to be utilized to design future pivotal studies of the device in the
pediatric population.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of the Nucleus™ 24
Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) in pediatric patients who do not have Neurofibromatosis Type
2 (NF2); specifically, children with total hearing loss due to severe cochlear anomalies,
cochlear nerve disorders or failed cochlear implantation. These conditions can include:
developmental or acquired cochlear nerve deficiency (CND), cochlear aplasia, post-meningitis
cochlear ossification, or cochlear malformation. This study proposes to implant up to 10
pre-linguistic young children (18 mos to 5 yrs. of age) and up to 10 post-linguistic children
(<21 yrs of age) with the Nucleus 24 Multichannel ABI in an attempt to demonstrate safety of
the surgical procedure and device stimulation and the potential for auditory benefit beyond
that experienced with a CI. These children would not qualify for the Nucleus ABI device, as
their etiology is not an approved indication such as neurofibromatosis Type 2(NF2). Further,
these children do not benefit from conventional hearing aids or cochlear implants.
Two groups of children will be included: Group 1 will include prelingiustic deaf children
ages 18 months - 5 years and Group 2 will include postlinguistic deaf children < 21 years of
age. Post-operative evaluations will be conducted at the initial activation and at 1, 3, 6,
12, 18, 24, 30, and 36-month intervals post-activation in order to demonstrate the emergence
of open-set speech perception abilities prior to study cessation. Experience in the CI
literature has shown that a minimum of 2 years of device usage is required for children with
pre-lingual hearing impairment to develop some open-set speech perception abilities. While
Group 2 is post-linguistic and some may have had significant hearing prior to becoming deaf,
the same time intervals will be used for consistency. Blinding or masking procedures are not
included in the design, as the presence/absence of a brainstem implant cannot be easily
concealed from the device recipients and/or clinical investigators.
Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) in pediatric patients who do not have Neurofibromatosis Type
2 (NF2); specifically, children with total hearing loss due to severe cochlear anomalies,
cochlear nerve disorders or failed cochlear implantation. These conditions can include:
developmental or acquired cochlear nerve deficiency (CND), cochlear aplasia, post-meningitis
cochlear ossification, or cochlear malformation. This study proposes to implant up to 10
pre-linguistic young children (18 mos to 5 yrs. of age) and up to 10 post-linguistic children
(<21 yrs of age) with the Nucleus 24 Multichannel ABI in an attempt to demonstrate safety of
the surgical procedure and device stimulation and the potential for auditory benefit beyond
that experienced with a CI. These children would not qualify for the Nucleus ABI device, as
their etiology is not an approved indication such as neurofibromatosis Type 2(NF2). Further,
these children do not benefit from conventional hearing aids or cochlear implants.
Two groups of children will be included: Group 1 will include prelingiustic deaf children
ages 18 months - 5 years and Group 2 will include postlinguistic deaf children < 21 years of
age. Post-operative evaluations will be conducted at the initial activation and at 1, 3, 6,
12, 18, 24, 30, and 36-month intervals post-activation in order to demonstrate the emergence
of open-set speech perception abilities prior to study cessation. Experience in the CI
literature has shown that a minimum of 2 years of device usage is required for children with
pre-lingual hearing impairment to develop some open-set speech perception abilities. While
Group 2 is post-linguistic and some may have had significant hearing prior to becoming deaf,
the same time intervals will be used for consistency. Blinding or masking procedures are not
included in the design, as the presence/absence of a brainstem implant cannot be easily
concealed from the device recipients and/or clinical investigators.
Inclusion Criteria:
Group 1: Prelinguistic hearing loss (birth-5 years; age at implantation of ABI 18 months-5
years)
• Pre-linguistic hearing loss (birth-5 yrs.; age at ABI 18 months-5yrs) with both:
- MRI +/- CT evidence of one of the following:
- Cochlear nerve deficiency
- Cochlear aplasia or severe hypoplasia
- Severe inner ear malformation
- Post-meningitis ossification
- When a cochlea is present or patent, lack of significant benefit from CI despite
consistent use (>6 mo.)
- No or limited speech perception ability (limited to pattern perception on closed
set testing materials using the CI)
- Lack of progress in auditory skills development
Group 2: Post-linguistic hearing loss (<21 yrs. of age)
- Post-linguistic hearing loss (<21 yrs. of age) with:
- Loss or lack of benefit from appropriate CI without the possibility for revision
or contralateral implantation. Examples might include:
- Post-meningitis ossification
- Bilateral temporal bone fractures with cochlear nerve avulsion
- Failed revision CI without benefit
- Previously developed open set speech perception and auditory-oral language skills
- No medical contraindications
- Willing to receive the appropriate meningitis vaccinations
- No or limited cognitive/developmental delays.
- Strong family support
- Reasonable expectations from parents/guardians including a thorough understanding:
- of potential benefits and limitations of ABI
- of parental role in rehabilitation
- that the child may not develop spoken language as a primary communication mode or
even sufficient spoken language to make significant academic progress in an
aural/oral environment
- Involvement in a rehabilitation program that emphasizes development of auditory skills
with or without the use of supplementary visual communication.
- Able to comply with study requirements including travel to investigation sites.
- Informed consent for the procedure from the child's parents/legal guardian.
Exclusion Criteria:
For both Groups 1 and 2:
- Pre- or post-linguistic child currently making significant progress with CI Even for
the very young children (18 months of age with 6 months of use), nearly all children
with a good auditory signal from their CI will show evidence of improvement in these
metrics over time.
- MRI evidence of one of the following:
- normal cochlea and cochlear nerves or NF2
- brainstem or cortical anomaly that makes implantation unfeasible
- Clear surgical reason for poor CI performance that can be remediated with revision CI
or contralateral surgery rather than ABI.
- Intractable seizures or progressive, deteriorating neurological disorder
- Patients with evidence of Chiari malformation, hydrocephalus, spina bifid a
- Patients with any foreseeable need for a future MRI scan
- Unable to participate in behavioral testing and mapping with their CI. If this appears
to be an age effect, ABI will be delayed until we can be assured that the child will
be able to participate, as reliable objective measures of mapping are currently not
available for mapping these devices.
- Unable to tolerate general anesthesia (cardiac, pulmonary, bleeding diathesis, etc.).
- Need for brainstem irradiation
- Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject/family regarding the possible
benefits, risks and limitations inherent to the procedure and ABI device.
- Unwilling to sign the informed consent.
- Unwilling to make necessary follow-up appointments.
We found this trial at
1
site
New York, New York 10016
Principal Investigator: John T. Roland, MD
Phone: 212-263-8182
Click here to add this to my saved trials