The Value of Integrating Visual Arts: Evaluating the Benefits of Hospital Room Artwork on Inpatient Wellbeing

The arts have long played a role in health and healing dating back to the 14th century when
paintings ushered patients to a good death or immortalized patrons for charitable
activities. Today, about half of all hospitals have dedicated art programs ranging from
permanent displays of art throughout their buildings to art therapies at the bedside and
performances in public spaces such as waiting areas. Offered to patients with a range of
conditions, their families and visitors, those programs aim to "improve patients' overall
health outcomes, treatment compliance and quality of life". Yet, while patient surveys
indicate interior design features such as artwork can make hospital environments less
institutionalized and more emotionally pleasing, few randomized controlled trials have
linked specific design features or interventions directly to impacts on healthcare outcomes.
The Value of Integrating Visual Arts: Evaluating the Benefits of Hospital Room Artwork on
Inpatient Wellbeing will add significantly to those data.

The physical environment of the inpatient hospital room essentially provides a blank canvas
on which to study the impact of visual arts on patient outcomes. Studies show that patients
care about their physical surroundings, and while efforts in recent years have aimed to make
hospital rooms less austere, in most cases, they remain institutional environments. The
Pick-a-Pic Program at the Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center addresses this problem
by allowing patients to modify one aspect of their physical environment through the personal
selection of an art print by a local, professional artist to be displayed in their rooms
during their hospitalization. Placed in frames mounted on the walls directly in patients'
line of vision from their hospital beds, these prints can help to create a supportive and
comforting environment. Their efficacy is predicated on the capacity of visual arts to
provide positive distractions for patients and family members coping with the stress of
illness by adding a personal touch to the hospital environment and making the spaces as
familiar and homelike as possible.

This project draws upon distraction theory, which posits that patients who become engrossed
in or open to a positive distraction attend less to their pain and even experience reduced
or altered perceptions of pain. Changing even one environmental factor—such as introducing a
visual stimulus—can provide that distraction. Burn patients, for instance, who watch videos
of nature scenes with accompanying music during burn dressing changes were found to
experience less pain and report less anxiety. Similar findings were reported for those
patients who viewed a nature scene and heard nature sounds while undergoing a painful
flexible bronchoscopy. In studies involving healthy volunteers, participants shown videos of
nature scenes—some with music and some without—had higher pain thresholds and pain tolerance
than volunteers who stared at blank or black screens. Positive distractions as part of the
healthcare physical environment also have been found to be effective in diminishing feelings
of stress and its accompanying psychological and physiological impacts. When videos, still
art, and window film of nature images were introduced into two emergency departments,
researchers noted reductions in behaviors indicative of stress and anxiety. Artwork has been
found to have a positive effect on patients' moods as well.

The proposed study - The Value of Integrating Visual Arts (VIVA): Evaluating the Benefits of
Hospital Room Artwork on Inpatient Wellbeing - builds on these findings and advances them in
novel and significant ways. First, this is a rare three-arm randomized controlled trial with
large participant numbers designed to quantitatively assess the benefit of visual arts to
individuals. The participants in our study represent a specific subgroup—i.e., patients—with
a discrete disease diagnosis of cancer who are undergoing treatment in the Cancer Institute
at the Penn State Hershey Medical Center. According to the Center for Disease Control, more
than 19 million adults, or almost one in ten Americans, have been diagnosed with cancer.
Widely known as one of the most disruptive illnesses affecting human beings, cancer
treatment is painful and invasive, and patients and their families must cope with feelings
of anxiety, vulnerability, and uncertainty - feelings that can be exacerbated by the stark
medicalized environment. Positive visual stimulus in the form of artwork has the capacity to
provide biopsychosocial respite that can be captured in measurable patient outcomes from
this physical and psychological trauma. While this research study is particularly relevant
for cancer patients, findings of this project holds promise for all hospital inpatients who
are subject to the same sorts of environmental stimuli as they undergo institutional
treatment. According to the CDC, there are a reported 35.1 million inpatients annually
receiving care in U.S. hospitals, and the average length of stay is 4.8 days. As clinical
and economic data have traditionally carried the greatest weight in decisions by hospital
administrators, this study has the potential to produce strong scientific data establishing
the visual arts as an environmental modification with clear and persuasive benefits for a
hospital and its patients that deserves investment.

This study also is innovative in linking measurable patient outcomes to patient control of
one aspect of the hospital physical environment—namely, artwork for inpatient rooms. Studies
that have examined artwork and physiological outcomes have largely involved views of nature
from windows or representational nature scenes, both of which have been provided to rather
than chosen by patients. In studies involving patient choice, the focus often has been to
determine patients' preferences for different kinds of artwork—e.g., representational nature
scenes vs. abstract, rural scenes vs. urban—with an eye to developing guidelines for art
selection and placement. While qualitative data exist that show patients who are able to
influence their physical environment report increased feelings of emotional and physical
comfort as well as improved moods, few studies have used rigorous study designs to measure
the benefit of choice of artwork on medical outcomes.

Finally, this study is innovative in using a single lens—visual arts—to examine the benefits
of the arts in hospital rooms on patient satisfaction, a key parameter to healthcare
providers in today's competitive market. Other examinations of the physical environment have
included architectural features such as size and shape of hospital rooms, ambient features
such as lighting and temperature, and colors. By specifying room décor in patient
satisfaction surveys, this study can provide hospitals with strong and persuasive data on a
relatively low-cost way to improve the aesthetics of patients' rooms. Indeed, prints of
artwork used in the Pick-a-Pic program at the medical center cost about $90 to produce.

This research study seeks to answer (1) whether the presence of visual arts in a patient's
hospital room significantly improves patient outcomes as measured by perceptions of anxiety,
reports of pain, use of pain medications, requests for nursing staff; (2) whether patient's
personal choice of a visual arts print (versus having a print but no choice) significantly
improves those outcomes; and (3) whether the presence of visual arts significantly improves
patient satisfaction with the physical environment.

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients who are admitted to the Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute (7th floor) for
treatments including oncology, bone marrow transplant, and hematology. Patients will
be 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients whose treatments do not include oncology, bone marrow transplant, and
hematology; who are not hospitalized on the 7th floor of the Cancer Institute; and
who are not 18 years or older.