Comparison of Forced Air and Conductive Patient Heating Systems During Ambulatory Surgeries



Status:Completed
Conditions:Hospital
Therapuetic Areas:Other
Healthy:No
Age Range:18 - Any
Updated:4/21/2016
Start Date:June 2015
End Date:July 2015

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

Comparison of forced air and conductive warming devices in outpatient orthopaedic surgeries.

Patients will be randomized into either the Forced Air group (FA) or Conductive Heat group
(CH). Randomization will be based on computer-generated codes that will be maintained in
sequentially numbered opaque envelopes. Fifty patients will be recruited with 25 patients
being randomized into each group.

In patients assigned to the FA group, a Bair Hugger (Arizant Medical, Inc., Eden Prairie,
Minnesota) forced-air cover will be positioned over the upper body (if lower extremity
surgery) or lower body (if upper extremity surgery). The forced-air blower will be set and
activated per standard practice usually after prepping and draping.

In patients assigned to the CH group, a VitaHeat (VitaHeat, Inc, Aurora, IL) conductive
heating device will be placed under the torso of the patient. The device will be set and
activated per standard practice usually just after positioning of the patient on the
operating table.

Patients in both groups will be otherwise draped per surgical routine. Ambient temperature
will be maintained near 20°C. Temperatures will be recorded using a temporal artery
thermometer.

Inclusion Criteria:

- patients undergoing orthopaedic outpatient surgeries over 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

- allergic to material of bair hugger
We found this trial at
1
site
Geneva, Illinois 60134
?
mi
from
Geneva, IL
Click here to add this to my saved trials