Quantitating the Impact of Plerixafor
Status: | Recruiting |
---|---|
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 18 - 65 |
Updated: | 8/10/2018 |
Start Date: | August 2015 |
End Date: | December 2018 |
Contact: | E. Steve Woodle, MD |
Email: | Woodlees@uc.edu |
Phone: | 513-558-6001 |
Quantitating the Impact of Plerixafor Alone or in Combination With Bortezomib on Plasma Cell Mobilization and the Subsequent Impact on HLA Antibody Levels
The primary objective of this study is to conduct a proof of concept pilot study that will
provide a preliminary evaluation of the safety of plerixafor alone or in combination with
bortezomib on plasma cell mobilization, Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) antibody levels and
toxicity profile in sensitized patients awaiting kidney transplantation.
The secondary objective of this study is to conduct additional analyses of the study regimen
on HLA antibody levels using multiple different assays and statistical analysis.
provide a preliminary evaluation of the safety of plerixafor alone or in combination with
bortezomib on plasma cell mobilization, Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) antibody levels and
toxicity profile in sensitized patients awaiting kidney transplantation.
The secondary objective of this study is to conduct additional analyses of the study regimen
on HLA antibody levels using multiple different assays and statistical analysis.
The investigators have previously demonstrated that proteasome inhibition (with bortezomib)
provides effective antihumoral therapy for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and for
desensitization in kidney transplant recipients and candidates. These studies have also
demonstrated that plasma cell populations exhibit significant heterogeneity. Newly produced
plasma blasts and plasma cells, whether from a primary or anamnestic immunologic response,
during an acute AMR, are very sensitive to proteasome inhibitor-based therapy. Of the plasma
cell populations we have examined, those that demonstrate the greatest degree of resistance
to proteasome inhibitor therapy are those that reside within bone marrow niches. These long
lived bone marrow niche resident plasma cell (LLBMNRPC) populations demonstrate a significant
degree of resistance to bortezomib therapy. This concept of plasma cell niche providing long
term survival signals is supported by substantial literature from murine models. A number of
signals are involved that derive from the plasma cell niche which are thought to contribute
to long lived plasma cell survival including CXC-chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)/chemokine
(C-X-C motif) ligand 12 (CXCL12) interactions, Interleukin-6 (IL-6), B cell activating factor
(BAFF), and cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44). In addition, a number of cells have been
demonstrated to be involved in the plasma cell niche in either human or murine models,
including eosinophils, osteoclasts, bone marrow reticular cells, amongst others.
Interruption of CXCR4/CXCL12 interactions with plerixafor has been used to induce cluster of
differentiation 34+ (CD34+) bone marrow stem cell mobilization into the peripheral blood.
Since the CXCR4/CXCL12 interaction is also thought to be responsible for plasma cells homing
to the bone marrow niche, it has been hypothesized that plerixafor may also provide systemic
mobilization of bone marrow niche resident plasma cells, or alternatively, may induce a local
mobilization from the bone marrow niche of plasma cells. Given that previous studies have
indicated that mobilization of long lived plasma cells is thought to result in short term
(less than 72 hour) survival of long lived plasma cells, this represents a significant
potential for enhancement of proteasome inhibitor-based plasma cell targeting therapies.
Indeed, a previous abstract from the oncology literature has provided preliminary evidence
that combined plerixafor and bortezomib therapy may be of use in mobilizing the malignant
myeloma cell from its bone marrow niche, thereby enhancing sensitivity to bortezomib.
The purpose of the proposed study is to conduct a proof of concept and preliminary safety
evaluation of plerixafor alone and also combined therapy with plerixafor and bortezomib. The
investigators have prospectively conducted a meticulous assessment of bortezomib-related
toxicities in both the transplant recipient AMR and the transplant candidate desensitization
populations and recently published this in Transplantation. This experience, which now
includes over 100 treated patients, indicates that the toxicity profile of bortezomib is
quite comparable to that which is observed in the myeloma population. The investigators'
preliminary analysis of plerixafor and bortezomib based toxicities demonstrates that there is
no significant degree of overlap in the toxicities and no significant reasons to have
concerns regarding combinatorial toxicities a priori.
The investigators' extensive phase I/II study of bortezomib-based desensitization with and
without rituximab-based memory B-cell depletion and/or plasmapheresis has provided a
substantial experience as a first line approach for first generation plasma cell targeted
therapies for desensitization in kidney transplant candidates. The current proposal is the
first in the initiation of second generation plasma cell targeting protocols which have
substantial potential for applications beyond kidney transplant candidates. These types of
regimens may also lend themselves to AMR and desensitization in kidney transplant recipients
and also in heart and other solid organ transplant recipients. It is also possible that such
second generation plasma cell targeted protocols may also be of use for desensitization in
kidney transplant, heart transplant, and other solid organ transplant populations. Finally,
these plasma cell targeted therapies may also be of use in autoimmune diseases where
autoantibodies are thought to represent a major pathogenetic factor.
provides effective antihumoral therapy for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and for
desensitization in kidney transplant recipients and candidates. These studies have also
demonstrated that plasma cell populations exhibit significant heterogeneity. Newly produced
plasma blasts and plasma cells, whether from a primary or anamnestic immunologic response,
during an acute AMR, are very sensitive to proteasome inhibitor-based therapy. Of the plasma
cell populations we have examined, those that demonstrate the greatest degree of resistance
to proteasome inhibitor therapy are those that reside within bone marrow niches. These long
lived bone marrow niche resident plasma cell (LLBMNRPC) populations demonstrate a significant
degree of resistance to bortezomib therapy. This concept of plasma cell niche providing long
term survival signals is supported by substantial literature from murine models. A number of
signals are involved that derive from the plasma cell niche which are thought to contribute
to long lived plasma cell survival including CXC-chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)/chemokine
(C-X-C motif) ligand 12 (CXCL12) interactions, Interleukin-6 (IL-6), B cell activating factor
(BAFF), and cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44). In addition, a number of cells have been
demonstrated to be involved in the plasma cell niche in either human or murine models,
including eosinophils, osteoclasts, bone marrow reticular cells, amongst others.
Interruption of CXCR4/CXCL12 interactions with plerixafor has been used to induce cluster of
differentiation 34+ (CD34+) bone marrow stem cell mobilization into the peripheral blood.
Since the CXCR4/CXCL12 interaction is also thought to be responsible for plasma cells homing
to the bone marrow niche, it has been hypothesized that plerixafor may also provide systemic
mobilization of bone marrow niche resident plasma cells, or alternatively, may induce a local
mobilization from the bone marrow niche of plasma cells. Given that previous studies have
indicated that mobilization of long lived plasma cells is thought to result in short term
(less than 72 hour) survival of long lived plasma cells, this represents a significant
potential for enhancement of proteasome inhibitor-based plasma cell targeting therapies.
Indeed, a previous abstract from the oncology literature has provided preliminary evidence
that combined plerixafor and bortezomib therapy may be of use in mobilizing the malignant
myeloma cell from its bone marrow niche, thereby enhancing sensitivity to bortezomib.
The purpose of the proposed study is to conduct a proof of concept and preliminary safety
evaluation of plerixafor alone and also combined therapy with plerixafor and bortezomib. The
investigators have prospectively conducted a meticulous assessment of bortezomib-related
toxicities in both the transplant recipient AMR and the transplant candidate desensitization
populations and recently published this in Transplantation. This experience, which now
includes over 100 treated patients, indicates that the toxicity profile of bortezomib is
quite comparable to that which is observed in the myeloma population. The investigators'
preliminary analysis of plerixafor and bortezomib based toxicities demonstrates that there is
no significant degree of overlap in the toxicities and no significant reasons to have
concerns regarding combinatorial toxicities a priori.
The investigators' extensive phase I/II study of bortezomib-based desensitization with and
without rituximab-based memory B-cell depletion and/or plasmapheresis has provided a
substantial experience as a first line approach for first generation plasma cell targeted
therapies for desensitization in kidney transplant candidates. The current proposal is the
first in the initiation of second generation plasma cell targeting protocols which have
substantial potential for applications beyond kidney transplant candidates. These types of
regimens may also lend themselves to AMR and desensitization in kidney transplant recipients
and also in heart and other solid organ transplant recipients. It is also possible that such
second generation plasma cell targeted protocols may also be of use for desensitization in
kidney transplant, heart transplant, and other solid organ transplant populations. Finally,
these plasma cell targeted therapies may also be of use in autoimmune diseases where
autoantibodies are thought to represent a major pathogenetic factor.
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Male and female patients between 18 and 65 years of age (inclusive) with end-stage
renal disease awaiting kidney transplantation.
2. Patient with eligible living donor will have: donor specific antibody (DSA) against
living donor of >5,000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) or a positive T or B cell
flow cytometry crossmatch.
3. Patient that is on the kidney transplant waiting list awaiting a deceased donor
transplant and has an immunodominant antibody (iAb) of >8,000MFI or has a current or
peak calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) >20%.
4. Voluntary written informed consent before performance of any study-related procedure
not part of normal medical care, with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn
by the subject at any time without prejudice to future medical care.
5. Female subject is either postmenopausal for at least 1 year prior to initiation of
study treatment, is surgically sterilized, or if of childbearing potential, agrees to
practice 2 effective methods of contraception from the time of signing the informed
consent form through 3 months after the last dose of plerixafor and/or bortezomib, or
agrees to completely abstain from heterosexual intercourse. Women of childbearing
potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within the last 48 hours prior to
receiving study medication.
6. Male subjects, even if surgically sterilized (i.e. status post-vasectomy) must agree
to 1 of the following effective contraception through 3 months after end of study.
7. Review of pre-transplant medical clearance by the patient's transplant nephrologist to
assure the patient is medically acceptable for study entry.
8. Cardiac evaluation by transplant nephrologist with clearance documented in writing to
participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Known hypersensitivity to bortezomib, boron or mannitol, plerixafor or any of its
components.
2. Actual body weight exceeds 175% of ideal body mass.
3. Subjects judged by the investigator to be at significant risk of failing to comply
with the requirements of the protocol or unable to cooperate or communicate with the
investigator.
4. Abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) with clinically significant ventricular arrhythmias
or other conduction abnormality that in the opinion of the investigator warrants
exclusion of the subject from the trial.
5. Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to enrollment or has New York Heart
Association (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure (Appendix A), uncontrolled angina,
severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias, or electrocardiographic evidence of acute
ischemia or active conduction system abnormalities.
6. Patient has Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy by Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse
Effects (CTCAE) criteria within 14 days before enrollment.
7. Patients with an absolute neutrophil count < 1,000/mm3 or platelet count < 75,000/mm3
within 30 days of consent.
8. Patient has received other investigational drugs within 14 days prior to initiation of
study treatment.
9. Receipt of a live vaccine within 4 weeks prior to initiation of study treatment.
10. Received blood transfusions within 30 days prior to trial entry.
11. Serious medical (other than renal disease) or psychiatric illness likely to interfere
with participation in this clinical study.
12. Patients who are anti-HIV-positive, anti-Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) positive with a
detectable viral load, or HBsAg-positive on testing performed within one year of
consent.
13. History of malignancy within the past 5 years that is not considered to be cured, with
the exception of localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin (excised ≥ 2 years prior
to randomization).
14. Evidence of severe liver disease with abnormal liver profile (aspartate
aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or total bilirubin > 1.5 times
upper limit of normal (ULN)) on testing performed within 30 days of consent.
15. Patients with current or severe systemic infections.
16. Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women and women who might become pregnant during the
study.
We found this trial at
2
sites
University of Cincinnati The University of Cincinnati offers students a balance of educational excellence and...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
The Christ Hospital For more than 120 years, The Christ Hospital has been a leader...
Click here to add this to my saved trials