PeRiodontal Treatment to Eliminate Minority InEquality and Rural Disparities in Stroke

Stroke is the fourth leading cause of death and the leading cause of long-term adult
disability in the United States. Stroke remains more common in North and South Carolina, part
of the "buckle" of the stroke belt, and disproportionately impacts African Americans. The
reasons for this racial disparity are poorly understood and are not entirely explained by
traditional stroke risk factors. The REGARDS study found that tooth loss (a surrogate of
periodontal disease) was more common among African Americans than whites and was associated
with higher stroke risk and stroke risk factors. Given this result, REGARDS investigators
postulated that periodontal disease may be contributing to the racial disparity in stroke.
Additional data from this study shows that low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with
greater tooth loss, both of which are seen more frequently in African Americans as opposed to
their white counterparts. Considering these factors, a question arises about whether low SES,
race, a combination of the two, and/or traditional risk factors contribute to tooth loss,
periodontal disease, and recurrent vascular events. Howard and colleagues suggest in their
paper that race is the predominant factor contributing to vascular events after adjustment
for SES and risk factors. If the predisposition exists among African Americans for greater
periodontal disease and incident vascular events, then what modifications can clinicians make
to prevent recurrent vascular events in this population?

The PREMIERS study is a proposal for conducting an adequately powered two-center phase III
randomized controlled trial to test whether intensive periodontal treatment reduces the risk
of recurrent vascular events among ischemic stroke and TIA survivors. The study uses the
resources in both states including established dental centers, Joint Commission Certified
Stroke Centers, the Schools of Public Health, and the Institute for Partnerships to Eliminate
Health Disparities. The proposal addresses specific issues with regards to recruitment of
African-American and rural stroke/TIA patients advocating the use of culturally appropriate
strategies to educate the study subjects regarding stroke, periodontal disease and the
periodontal stroke link. The study proposes to utilize economic evaluation of the periodontal
intervention from the budgetary perspective. The focus will be on the financial
sustainability of providing aggressive periodontal therapy (with certain, although relatively
low expenditures) in exchange for a reduction of uncertain recurrent vascular events that may
require high cost emergency department utilization and/or inpatient care. The sustainability
of the proposed intervention after the completion of the project is integrally linked to the
health economic assessment to show the health care cost savings. By integration with a rural
primary care center, with an African American majority and households with average incomes
below the state average, the study ensures that the proposed intervention to reduce stroke
disparity is applicable to this target population.

Objectives:

The investigators propose to conduct a phase III randomized controlled trial to test whether
intensive periodontal treatment reduces the risk of recurrent vascular events among ischemic
stroke and TIA survivors.

Since AAs in the United States who are 50-64 years of age have approximately three times more
PD than whites in the same age group, this study will also contribute to the investigators
understanding of existing racial disparities in stroke incidence in the United States.

The following specific aims are proposed:

Aim 1: Evaluate the effect of periodontal treatment on recurrent vascular events (PRIMARY
OUTCOME) among ischemic stroke/TIA survivors.

Research Questions:

1.1) Are recurrent vascular events less likely among individuals receiving intensive
periodontal treatment versus control treatment among stroke and TIA survivors?

1.2) Is the effect of periodontal treatment different in AAs and whites?

Aim 2: Evaluate the effect of periodontal treatment on stroke risk factors (SECONDARY
OUTCOME) among stroke and TIA survivors.

Research Questions:

2.1) What is the effect of intensive periodontal treatment on carotid artery intimal medial
(IMT) thickening and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) among stroke and TIA
survivors?

2.2) Is there a difference between AA and white ischemic stroke/TIA survivors in the effect
of intensive periodontal treatment on carotid IMT thickening and hs-CRP among individuals
receiving intensive periodontal treatment versus control treatment?

2.3) What is the effect of intensive periodontal treatment on control of blood pressure and
dyslipidemia among stroke survivors?

2.4) Is there a difference between AA and white ischemic stroke/TIA survivors in the effect
of intensive periodontal treatment on control of blood pressure and dyslipidemia?

Aim 3: Disseminate information regarding periodontal care, methods of stroke prevention, and
results from the trial to the community in a culturally appropriate manner.

Design and Procedures

A. Study Overview: Consenting patients admitted to University of South Carolina (USC)
Palmetto Health Hospital and University of North Carolina (UNC) Neuroscience Hospital with
recent ischemic stroke or TIA (≤ 90 days), will be initially screened for periodontal status.
Individuals with at least five teeth present and signs of initial/severe periodontitis will
be considered for enrollment. These potential participants will be assessed for the serum
inflammatory marker hs-CRP, stroke risk factors, carotid IMT, medication use (e.g.
antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants, statins, BP therapy) and SES. Participants will be
randomized using a 1:1 adaptive randomization protocol to aggressive periodontal therapy
(scaling and root planing [S&RP] + standard of care stroke prevention strategies) versus
standard dental care with community dental referral + standardized stroke prevention. Both
groups of patients will have 12-month duration follow-ups to assess for vascular events,
stroke risk factors and carotid IMT. A total of 400 patients will be randomized at the two
centers over three years.

B. Study population: The study population will be drawn from consecutive stroke and TIA
patients presenting to the inpatient service and the outpatient clinic at the USC Palmetto
Health Richland Stroke Center and the UNC Comprehensive Stroke Center. Both centers are Joint
Commission Certified Stroke Centers located amidst the Stroke Belt serving as a regional
referral center for several rural and underserved counties in their respective states. There
is an average of 1,330 ischemic stroke/TIA patients admitted annually at USC, 50% AAs, 52%
males, and approximately 20% are self-pay/Medicaid patients; and an average of 875 ischemic
stroke/TIA patients admitted annually at UNC, 38% AAs, 48% males, and approximately 20% are
self-pay/Medicaid patients. Minority and female patients will be aggressively recruited to
ensure at least 50% minority and 40% female representation. Both centers have significant
experience in recruiting stroke/TIA patients with other prospective longitudinal stroke
studies. At UNC the preliminary data was collected for this proposed study. At USC, in a
12-month period we enrolled 100 stroke/TIA patients, of whom 42% were AA and 39% female for a
separate prospective longitudinal study. We estimate that 2,000 ischemic stroke/TIA patients
will be screened for eligibility over a period of three years (333 screened/year/center). The
researchers estimate that using the screening criteria, 800 subjects will be deemed eligible,
of who 400 will be randomized (200 to each treatment arm). With an estimated drop-out rate of
approximately 10%, the researchers estimate we will obtain at least 180 evaluable patients in
each arm with one year of follow-up data.

Study Outcomes The study will use vascular events in the form of ischemic stroke, MI, and
cardiovascular death as the primary outcome events. Outcome events will be adjudicated by the
Principal Investigator and analyzed as composite of all outcomes at three, six, nine, and 12
months from randomization.

- Ischemic stroke: is diagnosed when a patient develops a new focal neurological deficit
that is sudden in onset, thought to have a vascular cause, lasts at least 24 hours, and
is not associated with a brain hemorrhage on brain CT or MRI when available. Situations
where symptoms last <24 hours without evidence of a new infarct will be regarded as
TIAs.

- Acute MI: will be defined according to criteria modified from the 2000 Consensus
Conference of the European and American Colleges of Cardiology, based on symptoms and
electrocardiogram changes, in conjunction with contemporary biochemical markers of
myocardial necrosis (troponin or creatine kinase).

- Cardiovascular Death: will be classified as 'cardiac death' or 'other cardiovascular
death'. Cardiac death must have a cardiac cause as the main reason of death. All other
cardiovascular deaths are defined as 'other cardiovascular death' (e.g. stroke, bleeding
episode, pulmonary embolism and procedural).

- Etiological classification of stroke: will be classified using the Trial of Org 10172 in
Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria. This analysis, along with stroke sub-typing,
will help differentiate between cardioembolism versus atherothrombotic events arising
from shared risk factors.

The study will measure progression of atherosclerosis (carotid IMT) and other stroke risk
factors as a secondary outcome: Progression of Atherosclerosis Measurement: The dependent
variable is carotid artery IMT ≥1-mm, derived by dichotomizing IMT at 1-mm. The 1-mm cut
point is chosen because of its clinical and prognostic significance, as it has been
associated with the subsequent development of coronary heart disease and stroke.

• Carotid IMT will be measured by B-mode ultrasound in all participants at baseline and at a
one-year followup visit. Analyses will be based on the mean IMT of the far wall for 1-cm
lengths of the right and left carotid bifurcation and internal and common carotid arteries.

Measurement of stroke risk factors:

- Blood Pressure (BP) will be recorded at baseline and at follow-up: six and 12 months
from randomization. Averaged consecutive triplicate readings will be obtained with a
semiautomatic Omron oscillometric BP monitor. Individuals will rest for five minutes
sitting in a semi-reclined position on the dental chair, after which BP recordings will
be performed. Patients will rest for one minute between blood pressure readings.

- Blood samples: Serial blood samples will be collected at baseline and at follow-up: 12
months after randomization. These blood samples will be assessed for hs-CRP, hemoglobin
A1C, and fasting lipid profile in a blind fashion.

Measurement of vascular cognitive impairment:

- To assess for vascular cognitive impairment, the standardized clinical assessment,
Montreal Cognitive Assessment or MOCA, will be administered to all participants at
baseline and at a one-year followup visit. The test assesses eight domains of cognitive
functioning: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language,
visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation.

- White mater disease will be assessed from FLAIR scans obtained from the initial
clinical, standard of care MRI and/or CT scan that stroke/TIA patients receive

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patient is at least 18 years of age with no upper age limit

2. Patient is able to consent, follow an outpatient protocol, and is available by
telephone

3. Non-severely disabling initial stroke (modified Rankin score ≤ 3) or TIA in the past
90 days

4. Evaluable for periodontal examination and treatment (≥ 5 teeth) and able to sustain a
dental examination

5. Contain ≥ 2 interproximal sites with ≥ 4 mm of clinical attachment loss (CAL) (initial
periodontitis as defined by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Working Group on
Surveillance Systems for Periodontal Infections - see below)

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Stroke due to intracranial hemorrhage, dissection, veno-occlusive disease, drugs,
trauma, or vasculitis

2. Previous neurological impairment that would make detection of a subsequent event
difficult

3. Co-morbid conditions that may limit survival to less than one year

4. Brain CT or MRI which shows a lesion other than stroke as the cause of the syndrome

5. History of medical conditions requiring antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental exam
(artificial cardiac valves, previous inflammation of the heart or valves, complex
heart conditions or other heart malformations since birth, surgically constructed
systemic pulmonary shunts, valvular dysfunctions, prolapse, hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy, first two years of joint replacement, previous infections from
artificial joint, any chronic or radiation-induced condition leading to
immunosuppression or hemophilia)

6. Patients on oral anticoagulant therapy with a Prothrombin Time International
Normalized Ratio (PT-INR) greater than 3.5 (may be corrected and enrolled).

7. Pregnancy confirmed by urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential (≤ 55
years age)

8. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthesia or minocycline that cannot be
medically managed

9. Participation in another randomized clinical trial.