Lay Theories of Health in Young and Middle Aged American Adults
Status: | Completed |
---|---|
Conditions: | Healthy Studies |
Therapuetic Areas: | Other |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 18 - 50 |
Updated: | 7/30/2016 |
Start Date: | April 2007 |
End Date: | September 2007 |
Study 1 of Lay Theories of Health: Conceptualizations of Physical, Mental, and Social Health in Young and Middle-Aged Adults
This study is the second empirical investigation in a series of studies, examining what
everyday people believe that it means to be healthy. Part of this research also involves
examining whether these lay theories of health vary according to various demographic
classifications.
everyday people believe that it means to be healthy. Part of this research also involves
examining whether these lay theories of health vary according to various demographic
classifications.
In the journal "Science," Engel (1977) proposed the term "biopsychosocial model" to
recognize the social and psychological factors impacting health and illness. Psychologists
have played a significant role in contributing to current evidence for this model, including
understanding how individuals think about their health.
Work in this area has corresponded to work on the implicit theories of individuals, and how
those implicit theories have an impact upon cognition, affect, and behavior. Implicit
theories are mental constructions about specific phenomena which, while often elaborate in
structure, content, and function, are not well articulated by those who hold them.
A failure to thoroughly investigate lay theories of health has implications for the
biopsychosocial model of health and illness, which states that it is not only the knowledge
of the physician, but also the beliefs of the patient, that have consequences for the
patient's experience of health and illness. Research on individual beliefs regarding illness
has been accumulating for some time, and it is becoming apparent that these beliefs have
significant consequences for individual health behavior. However, current studies assessing
lay theories regarding illness may be inadequate to achieving the goal of fully learning how
lay theories have an impact upon health. The methodologies utilized rarely distinguish
whether the implicit theories under study should be attributed to laypeople or to experts,
and tend to assume that health and illness have perfect reciprocal correspondence with one
another in the minds of laypeople. If researchers hope to understand laypeople's theories
about health, exclusively investigating lay theories of illness will not suffice to answer
the question.
The present series of studies seeks to investigate a number of unanswered questions in the
existing literature on lay theories of health. In a Prestudy, we investigated how adult
laypeople define what it is to be healthy through open-ended survey questions. At the
present time (the focus of the current IRB application) we hope to have participants rate
the importance of each of the previously-gathered items to their concept of health (Study
1). We will then present the most important items in pairs to a second sample, and ask those
participants to rate how similar or dissimilar the items are to one another. From these
ratings, we will determine the structure of lay theories of health through scaling
procedures. After determining the structure of lay theories (e.g., in terms of dimensions),
we will focus on developing a comprehensive measure of lay theories of health. We will at
that time conduct a series of validation studies to determine whether and how these
dimensions of lay theories differ from those of experts, do or do not correspond with
existing constructs measuring well-being, and are utilized by laypeople in making health
judgments and decisions (which will be reviewed and conducted at a later date).
recognize the social and psychological factors impacting health and illness. Psychologists
have played a significant role in contributing to current evidence for this model, including
understanding how individuals think about their health.
Work in this area has corresponded to work on the implicit theories of individuals, and how
those implicit theories have an impact upon cognition, affect, and behavior. Implicit
theories are mental constructions about specific phenomena which, while often elaborate in
structure, content, and function, are not well articulated by those who hold them.
A failure to thoroughly investigate lay theories of health has implications for the
biopsychosocial model of health and illness, which states that it is not only the knowledge
of the physician, but also the beliefs of the patient, that have consequences for the
patient's experience of health and illness. Research on individual beliefs regarding illness
has been accumulating for some time, and it is becoming apparent that these beliefs have
significant consequences for individual health behavior. However, current studies assessing
lay theories regarding illness may be inadequate to achieving the goal of fully learning how
lay theories have an impact upon health. The methodologies utilized rarely distinguish
whether the implicit theories under study should be attributed to laypeople or to experts,
and tend to assume that health and illness have perfect reciprocal correspondence with one
another in the minds of laypeople. If researchers hope to understand laypeople's theories
about health, exclusively investigating lay theories of illness will not suffice to answer
the question.
The present series of studies seeks to investigate a number of unanswered questions in the
existing literature on lay theories of health. In a Prestudy, we investigated how adult
laypeople define what it is to be healthy through open-ended survey questions. At the
present time (the focus of the current IRB application) we hope to have participants rate
the importance of each of the previously-gathered items to their concept of health (Study
1). We will then present the most important items in pairs to a second sample, and ask those
participants to rate how similar or dissimilar the items are to one another. From these
ratings, we will determine the structure of lay theories of health through scaling
procedures. After determining the structure of lay theories (e.g., in terms of dimensions),
we will focus on developing a comprehensive measure of lay theories of health. We will at
that time conduct a series of validation studies to determine whether and how these
dimensions of lay theories differ from those of experts, do or do not correspond with
existing constructs measuring well-being, and are utilized by laypeople in making health
judgments and decisions (which will be reviewed and conducted at a later date).
Inclusion Criteria:
- English primary language
- U.S. residency (but not necessarily citizenship)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Only by age
We found this trial at
1
site
Click here to add this to my saved trials