Comparison of Patient Outcomes Using Different Delivery Models of Anticoagulation Care



Status:Active, not recruiting
Conditions:Cardiology
Therapuetic Areas:Cardiology / Vascular Diseases
Healthy:No
Age Range:18 - Any
Updated:4/21/2016
Start Date:August 1999

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

Hypothesis: Does the time spent within the target INR range differ when patients are managed
by AMD or IT models of anticoagulation care?

Experimental Design: The 36-month trial enrolled 192 eligible patients currently receiving
chronic warfarin therapy at the William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital. Consenting
patients are enrolled and randomized to 1 of 2 groups: usual clinic care with face-to-face
visits every 4 weeks (AMS model) or clinic visits every 3 months with interim laboratory
visits and telephone follow-up every 4 weeks (IT model). At study conclusion, the amount of
time the INR is within target range will be compared between the two groups. Thromboembolic
and bleeding event rates, patient knowledge, quality of life and healthcare utilization will
also be analyzed.


Inclusion Criteria:

- completion of >3 months of warfarin

- indefinite warfarin therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

- patients who currently receive >25% of INR determinations per year from local labs

- extended absences from VA
We found this trial at
1
site
Madison, Wisconsin 53792
(608) 263-2400
University of Wisconsin In achievement and prestige, the University of Wisconsin–Madison has long been recognized...
?
mi
from
Madison, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials