Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (F.A.M.E.)



Status:Completed
Conditions:Cardiology
Therapuetic Areas:Cardiology / Vascular Diseases
Healthy:No
Age Range:18 - Any
Updated:4/21/2016
Start Date:January 2006
End Date:September 2015

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

In this multicenter, international study we are evaluating two approaches to determine which
coronary artery narrowings require stent placement in patients with multivessel coronary
artery disease. Patients will be randomized to an angiographic strategy, where only coronary
angiography is used to determine which lesions to stent or to a pressure wire strategy where
fractional flow reserve, an index measured with the pressure wire, will be used to determine
which lesions to stent. The primary outcome will be major adverse cardiac events at 1 year.
A secondary outcome will be cost-effectiveness.

Detailed protocol

- If a patient is eligible for the study (see inclusion and exclusion criteria) and has
given informed consent, the operator has to define all lesions with a stenosis severity
of at least 50% by visual estimate in which he would consider stent implantation. These
stenoses are noted on a scheme of the coronary arteries before randomization.

- Thereafter, randomization is performed to the FFR-guided strategy or the
angiography-guided strategy. If the patient is randomized to the angiography-guided
strategy, all the lesions indicated beforehand, will be stented with drug-eluting
stents. If the patient is assigned to the FFR-guided group, fractional flow reserve is
measured in all lesions and only those lesions are stented with a fractional flow
reserve at least aspirin 80 mg daily and clopidogrel (Plavix) 75 mg per day for at least
12months.

- FFR should be determined by using i.v. adenosine 140 µg/kg/min, in order to make
pull-back recordings and analyze different abnormalities along the coronary arteries.
Adenosine i.v. by the femoral venous route, is mandatory for participation in the
study.

- In case of serial stenosis, FFR 'of the complete vessel' should be PCI of one of more of these lesions in case the patient belongs to the FFR-guided
group. In case of the angio-guided group, every lesion >50% by visual estimation that
the operator indicated a prior as requiring stenting, should be stented (this is
mandatory). Long stents to cover a segment or multiple shorter stents, can be placed at
the discretion of the operator.

Follow-up

All patients will be followed up after 1 month (±1 week), 6 months (±1 month), and 1 year
(±1 month). All adverse cardiac events (death, acute MI, CABG or [re]-PCI will be noted, as
well as functional class and number of anti-anginal drugs. If a patient is admitted to a
hospital because of an acute coronary syndrome, repeat angiography is strongly advocated to
define if the event is related to one of the deferred lesions or to one of the non-deferred
lesions. If the patient belongs to the FFR-guided arm, repeat measurement of FFR is
advocated for all lesions. If, during follow-up, patients in the FFR-guided group have to
undergo coronary angiography because of recurrent angina or any other reason without an
event, pressure measurement should be repeated as well.

On the contrary, once a patient has been assigned to the angiographic guided group, this
strategy should be followed consistently during follow-up investigations. For example, if a
patient in the angiographic guided arm has recurrent chest pain, undergoes angiography, and
is found to have in-stent restenosis, re-PCI should be performed based on the angiogram and
pressure wire use is prohibited.

In other words, the strategy to which the patient has been assigned initially, should be
followed during the entire study period.

Endpoints

Primary endpoints

1. The primary clinical endpoint is the 12-month binary major adverse cardiac event (MACE)
rate. MACE is defined as:

- All cause death,

- Documented myocardial infarction,

- Repeat revascularization (PCI and/or CABG) as adjudicated by the Clinical Event
Committee

Secondary endpoints

1. Global cost effectiveness after one year

2. Cardiac death and myocardial infarction rate at 1 year

3. Functional class at 1 year.

4. Number of anti-anginal drugs after 1 year

5. Overall MACE rate at 1 month post-procedure and at 6 months, 2, 3 and 5 years.

6. A comparison of outcomes based on type of drug-eluting stent.

7. Prognostic value of FFR after stenting.

8. Correlation between FFR and nuclear perfusion imaging.

Inclusion Criteria:- at least 2 coronary lesions of 50% stenosis or greater in at least 2
major epicardial arteries

- age>/=18

Exclusion Criteria:-- STEMI < 5 days ago or non-STEMI with CK > 1000 U/l < 5 days ago

- Pregnancy

- Extremely tortuous or calcified coronary arteries, or other technical conditions
interfering with reliable coronary pressure measurement

- Serious concomitant disease, decreasing life expectancy to <2 years

- Previous coronary bypass surgery (CABG)

- Contraindication for drug-eluting stent

- Cardiogenic shock

- Inability to give informed consent

- Suspicion of significant left main (LM) stenosis
We found this trial at
2
sites
291 Campus Dr
Stanford, California 94305
(650) 725-3900
Stanford University School of Medicine Vast in both its physical scale and its impact on...
?
mi
from
Stanford, CA
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Eindhoven,
?
mi
from
Eindhoven,
Click here to add this to my saved trials