Cryoablation or External-Beam Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Painful Bone Metastases
Status: | Terminated |
---|---|
Conditions: | Skin Cancer, Cancer, Cancer, Cancer, Cancer, Cancer, Chronic Pain, Kidney Cancer |
Therapuetic Areas: | Musculoskeletal, Oncology |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 18 - Any |
Updated: | 11/23/2018 |
Start Date: | February 2008 |
End Date: | January 2010 |
A Phase III Randomized Trial of Cryoablation vs. Radiation for the Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases
RATIONALE: Cryoablation kills cancer cells by freezing them. Radiation therapy uses
high-energy x-rays and other types of radiation to kill tumor cells. It is not yet known
whether cryoablation is more effective than external-beam radiation therapy in treating
painful bone metastases.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III clinical trial is studying cryoablation to see how well it
works compared with external-beam radiation therapy in treating patients with painful bone
metastases.
high-energy x-rays and other types of radiation to kill tumor cells. It is not yet known
whether cryoablation is more effective than external-beam radiation therapy in treating
painful bone metastases.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III clinical trial is studying cryoablation to see how well it
works compared with external-beam radiation therapy in treating patients with painful bone
metastases.
OBJECTIVES:
- To determine pain relief in cancer patients with painful metastatic disease involving
bone following treatment with cryoablation as compared to radiotherapy (RT).
- To compare the impact on quality-of-life following cryoablation or RT in patients with
painful metastatic disease as measured using the validated Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
and Short Form (SF)-8.
- To determine change in analgesic use following therapy.
- To determine the frequency and severity of complications following treatment of painful
metastases involving bone with either cryoablation or RT.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to size of the
indexing lesion (≤ 5 cm vs > 5 cm), location of the target lesion (pelvis vs extremity vs
vertebral body vs other), primary cancer type (melanoma or renal cell carcinoma vs other),
and severity of pain (i.e., worst pain score in the last 24-hour period) (4-6 vs 7-10).
Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I (percutaneous cryoablation): Cryoprobes are inserted percutaneously under CT scan
or ultrasound guidance, to the malignant soft tissue-bone interface. Patients undergo
ablations using a freeze-thaw-freeze cycle lasting approximately 10-5-10 minutes,
respectively.
- Arm II (external-beam radiotherapy): Patients undergo external-beam radiotherapy
comprising either a single 8 Gy dose or 20 Gy/5 fractions administered over 1 week.
Patients are contacted via phone on days 1 and 4 post treatment, weekly in weeks 1-4, every 2
weeks in weeks 6-24, and then every four weeks in weeks 28-36. Patients undergo pain and pain
interference with daily life assessment at baseline and at these time points. Patients who
elect to have repeated treatment (either radiotherapy or cryoablation) within the first 6
weeks after the initial treatment are removed from the study. Patients who fail to achieve a
2-point reduction in worst or average pain (in a 24-hour period) during weeks 6-20 after
initial treatment and patients who report a return of pain (i.e., pain ≥ the worst pain in a
24-hour period reported at baseline) for 2 consecutive time points are offered the
alternative treatment (radiotherapy or cryoablation, whichever the patient was not randomized
to receive at initial treatment)*.
NOTE: *Patients who refuse to receive the alternative treatment are taken off study.
- To determine pain relief in cancer patients with painful metastatic disease involving
bone following treatment with cryoablation as compared to radiotherapy (RT).
- To compare the impact on quality-of-life following cryoablation or RT in patients with
painful metastatic disease as measured using the validated Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
and Short Form (SF)-8.
- To determine change in analgesic use following therapy.
- To determine the frequency and severity of complications following treatment of painful
metastases involving bone with either cryoablation or RT.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to size of the
indexing lesion (≤ 5 cm vs > 5 cm), location of the target lesion (pelvis vs extremity vs
vertebral body vs other), primary cancer type (melanoma or renal cell carcinoma vs other),
and severity of pain (i.e., worst pain score in the last 24-hour period) (4-6 vs 7-10).
Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I (percutaneous cryoablation): Cryoprobes are inserted percutaneously under CT scan
or ultrasound guidance, to the malignant soft tissue-bone interface. Patients undergo
ablations using a freeze-thaw-freeze cycle lasting approximately 10-5-10 minutes,
respectively.
- Arm II (external-beam radiotherapy): Patients undergo external-beam radiotherapy
comprising either a single 8 Gy dose or 20 Gy/5 fractions administered over 1 week.
Patients are contacted via phone on days 1 and 4 post treatment, weekly in weeks 1-4, every 2
weeks in weeks 6-24, and then every four weeks in weeks 28-36. Patients undergo pain and pain
interference with daily life assessment at baseline and at these time points. Patients who
elect to have repeated treatment (either radiotherapy or cryoablation) within the first 6
weeks after the initial treatment are removed from the study. Patients who fail to achieve a
2-point reduction in worst or average pain (in a 24-hour period) during weeks 6-20 after
initial treatment and patients who report a return of pain (i.e., pain ≥ the worst pain in a
24-hour period reported at baseline) for 2 consecutive time points are offered the
alternative treatment (radiotherapy or cryoablation, whichever the patient was not randomized
to receive at initial treatment)*.
NOTE: *Patients who refuse to receive the alternative treatment are taken off study.
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Inclusion criteria:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumor metastasis with index lesion
involving or abutting bone
- Index lesion with bone destruction is predominantly osteolytic in nature as
assessed on CT imaging
- If the nature of the metastatic disease has been previously documented, the index
lesion to be treated does not require further documentation (i.e., biopsy)
- One primary painful metastatic site
- Additional less painful metastatic sites may be present
- Worst pain in the last 24 hours must be ≥ 4 on a 0-10 numeric scale
- Current analgesic therapies have failed OR the patient is experiencing intolerable
side effects
- Tumor is appropriate for radiotherapy as determined by the participating radiation
oncologist and accessible for cryoablation as determined by the participating
radiologists upon review of ultrasound, CT scan, X-ray, or MRI examinations
- Have completed chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or bisphosphonate therapy ≥ 4 weeks
prior to registration OR have developed pain or have persistent pain while on a stable
chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or bisphosphonate therapy regimen for a period of ≥ 4
weeks
Exclusion criteria:
- Index lesion causing clinical or radiographic evidence of spinal cord or cauda equina
compression/effacement
- Index lesion involves the skull
- Treatment of other painful lesions in patients with skull lesions is not excluded
- Index lesion has evidence of a pathologic fracture or impending fracture in
weight-bearing bones (e.g., vertebral body, periacetabular region, femur, or tibia)
with > 50% loss of cortical bone
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- Life expectancy ≥ 2 months
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Inclusion criteria:
- See Disease Characteristics
- No concurrent medication known to interfere with platelet function or coagulation
(e.g., aspirin, ibuprofen, clopidogrel, or warfarin) and such medications have been
discontinued for an appropriate time period based on the drug half-life and known
activity (e.g., aspirin for 7 days) for patients randomized to receive cryoablation
only
- Low molecular weight heparin preparations must be discontinued 8 hours prior to
cryoablation
- At least 2 weeks since prior cytotoxic chemotherapy (for patients randomized to
receive cryoablation only)
Exclusion criteria:
- Has undergone prior cryoablation or radiotherapy of the index lesion
- Prior radiopharmaceutical therapy completed ≤ 4 weeks prior to registration
- Initiation of new chemotherapy ≤ 4 weeks prior to registration
- Concurrent surgery involving the treated lesion
- Anticipated treatment of the index lesion that would require ice-ball formation within
0.5 cm of the spinal cord, brain, other critical nerve structure, large abdominal
vessel such as the aorta or IVC, bowel, or bladder
We found this trial at
7
sites
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale Mayo Clinic Arizona was the second Mayo practice to be established outside...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center One of the nation’s leading cancer research and treatment centers, the...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute Karmanos is based in southeast Michigan, in midtown Detroit, and...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
8800 W. Doyne Avenue
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226
(414) 805-6840
Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center Cancer touches everyone in our community, and for many,...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center The Mayo Clinic Cancer Center is a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive...
Click here to add this to my saved trials