Efficacy of Injection Therapy for Lateral Epicondylosis

CLE is a prevalent, disabling condition with significant individual and societal costs. The
incidence of CLE is increasing. CLE is often refractory to care. There is limited scientific
evidence to support specific therapies.

PrT and PRP show promise as effective therapy for CLE that can be performed in the primary
care setting. Pilot-level RCTs of PrT and PRP for CLE have reported large absolute effect
sizes. Findings from invitro and animal studies are consistent with the results of clinical
trials and suggest that both therapies can improve clinical outcomes and modify disease in
CLE. However, prior research is limited by lack of methodological rigor, non-validated
outcome measures and lack of integrated multidisciplinary outcome measures.

Positive trends in the proposed study would suggest the effect size of PrT and PRP for CLE,
and allow the calculation of a robust sample size to power an R01 study, and pilot test the
use of an integrated set of outcome measures. Statistically significant positive results on
clinical, biomechanical and radiological outcomes would demonstrate that PrT and PRP can
treat, modify the disease of and may be a cure for CLE. Such findings would provide enormous
benefits to patients through improved quality of life, reduced pain and disability, and to
industry and society at large through reduced workers' injury claims and absenteeism.

Inclusion Criteria:

1. age 18-65 years

2. diagnosis of CLE, confirmed by the PI using clinical symptoms and exam findings of
tenderness over the lateral epicondyle and/or extensor tendon, and pain on 2 extensor
muscle provocation tests

3. self-reported CLE-related pain for at least 6 months

4. self-reported failure of at least 2 of the 3 most common treatments for CLE (a course
of NSAIDS, physical therapy or corticosteroid injections).

Exclusion Criteria:

1. current bilateral CLE

2. a corticosteroid injection in the prior 3 months or prior PrT or PRP for CLE

3. current carpal tunnel syndrome, other elbow pathology, or acute trauma of the
CLE-affected upper extremity

4. self-reported history of bleeding disorders, other hematologic conditions,
inflammatory arthritis, systemic nervous system disease, upper extremity surgeries or
neuropathy

5. current use of opioids for pain

6. anticoagulation or immunosuppressive therapy in the prior month

7. intent to use NSAIDs or steroids

8. known allergy to dextrose, acetaminophen or lidocaine

9. MRI contraindications: non-compatible metal in the CLE-affected upper extremity or
severe claustrophobia

10. unresolved litigation

11. self-reported pregnancy. Pregnant women are excluded from the study because pregnancy
changes the characteristics of connective tissue including ligaments and tendons
associated with CLE and, so, is an unacceptable confounder in this pilot level study.
There is no report however, about dextrose, morrhuate sodium or PrT being harmful to
pregnant women. Therefore we will not draw confirmatory labs to ensure that women of
childbearing age are not pregnant. Rather we will accept self-report on pregnancy
status at the time of consent. If a woman becomes pregnant during the study she will
be dropped from the study.