Mainstream Sleep Tracking Devices vs Polysomnography
| Status: | Recruiting |
|---|---|
| Healthy: | No |
| Age Range: | 18 - 65 |
| Updated: | 7/30/2016 |
| Start Date: | March 2016 |
| End Date: | March 2017 |
| Contact: | Vicky Chiang |
| Email: | vc936@nyumc.org |
Sensitivity and Specificity of Mainstream Sleep Tracking Devices Compared to Polysomnography
The purpose of this study is to compare two popular portable sleep monitoring devices—the
Fitbit Charge®, Jawbone UP®, and SleepTime smartphone app—to the "gold standard"
Polysomnography (PSG). Parameters that will be analyzed include sleep onset latency, sleep
efficiency, and sleep staging. Specifically, this study will investigate the validity of the
Jawbone UP®, Fitbit Charge®, and SleepTime app in detecting sleep and wakefulness in
comparison to conventional Polysomnography (PSG).
Fitbit Charge®, Jawbone UP®, and SleepTime smartphone app—to the "gold standard"
Polysomnography (PSG). Parameters that will be analyzed include sleep onset latency, sleep
efficiency, and sleep staging. Specifically, this study will investigate the validity of the
Jawbone UP®, Fitbit Charge®, and SleepTime app in detecting sleep and wakefulness in
comparison to conventional Polysomnography (PSG).
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing Polysomnography
Exclusion Criteria:
- severe sleep apnea
- severe insomnia with less than two hours of sleep per night
- epileptiform activity
- electrical status epilepticus of sleep
We found this trial at
1
site
550 1st Ave
New York, New York 10016
New York, New York 10016
(212) 263-7300
Principal Investigator: Alcibiades Rodriguez
New York University School of Medicine NYU School of Medicine has a proud history that...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
