Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to Guide Revascularisation
| Status: | Active, not recruiting |
|---|---|
| Conditions: | Peripheral Vascular Disease, Cardiology |
| Therapuetic Areas: | Cardiology / Vascular Diseases |
| Healthy: | No |
| Age Range: | 18 - 90 |
| Updated: | 2/23/2018 |
| Start Date: | January 2014 |
| End Date: | January 19, 2021 |
Prospective, Multi-center, Double Blind, Randomised Study to Test the Safety of Deferral of Stenting in Physiological Non-significant Lesions in a Clinical Population of Intermediate Stenoses Using iFR and FFR
Narrowing of coronary arteries interferes with blood flow and can cause chest pain. But
patients may have more than one narrowing and studies have shown that not all narrowings need
to be treated. To identify the narrowings that need treating cardiologists sometimes quantify
the extent of the narrowing by measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR, the ratio of the
pressure in the aorta to the pressure downstream of the narrowing).This technique requires
the administration of drugs that add cost and time to the procedure and in some countries are
simply unavailable. As a result despite the clear health and healthcare costs benefits of FFR
its use is limited to less than 5% of procedure. We have developed a new technique called the
instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) that does not require the administration of drugs for its
accurate assessment. It has been approved for use in this indication. This study aims to
compare clinical outcomes of patients whose treatment has been guided by iFR to those whose
treatment has been guided by FFR. If iFR is found to provide the same clinical outcomes as
FFR its adoption will permit the clear benefits of this approach of identifying the coronary
narrowings that really need treatment to be applicable to a much larger patient population
and further improve healthcare costs.
patients may have more than one narrowing and studies have shown that not all narrowings need
to be treated. To identify the narrowings that need treating cardiologists sometimes quantify
the extent of the narrowing by measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR, the ratio of the
pressure in the aorta to the pressure downstream of the narrowing).This technique requires
the administration of drugs that add cost and time to the procedure and in some countries are
simply unavailable. As a result despite the clear health and healthcare costs benefits of FFR
its use is limited to less than 5% of procedure. We have developed a new technique called the
instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) that does not require the administration of drugs for its
accurate assessment. It has been approved for use in this indication. This study aims to
compare clinical outcomes of patients whose treatment has been guided by iFR to those whose
treatment has been guided by FFR. If iFR is found to provide the same clinical outcomes as
FFR its adoption will permit the clear benefits of this approach of identifying the coronary
narrowings that really need treatment to be applicable to a much larger patient population
and further improve healthcare costs.
Design:
Patients with one or more coronary stenoses, in which the physiological severity from
coronary angiography is in question, will be randomised 1:1 to use of the instantaneous wave
free ratio (iFR) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide the treatment strategy for
percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Aims:
To assess whether the iFR is non-inferior to FFR when used to guide treatment of coronary
stenosis with PCI.
Outcome measures:
The primary endpoint will be major adverse cardiac event rate in the iFR and FFR groups at 30
days, 1, 2, and 5 years.
Population:
This will be an international multi-centre study of 2500 patients. From population estimates,
35% of the total study population will present with stable angina and 65% will have acute
coronary syndrome.
Eligibility:
Patients will be eligible when the physiological severity of a stenosis within a vessel is in
question. In the cases of stable angina this will be confined to the target vessel, or with
acute coronary syndrome assessment this will be made in the non-culprit vessel.
Duration:
Anticipated recruitment is 12 months. Follow-up will be performed at 30 days, 1, 2 and 5
years.
Results:
Primary outcome results will be reported in Spring 2017.
Patients with one or more coronary stenoses, in which the physiological severity from
coronary angiography is in question, will be randomised 1:1 to use of the instantaneous wave
free ratio (iFR) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide the treatment strategy for
percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Aims:
To assess whether the iFR is non-inferior to FFR when used to guide treatment of coronary
stenosis with PCI.
Outcome measures:
The primary endpoint will be major adverse cardiac event rate in the iFR and FFR groups at 30
days, 1, 2, and 5 years.
Population:
This will be an international multi-centre study of 2500 patients. From population estimates,
35% of the total study population will present with stable angina and 65% will have acute
coronary syndrome.
Eligibility:
Patients will be eligible when the physiological severity of a stenosis within a vessel is in
question. In the cases of stable angina this will be confined to the target vessel, or with
acute coronary syndrome assessment this will be made in the non-culprit vessel.
Duration:
Anticipated recruitment is 12 months. Follow-up will be performed at 30 days, 1, 2 and 5
years.
Results:
Primary outcome results will be reported in Spring 2017.
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Age > 18 years of age
2. Willing to participate and able to understand, read and sign the informed consent
document before the planned procedure
3. Eligible for coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention
4. Coronary artery disease with at least 1 or more native major epicardial vessels or
their branches by coronary angiogram with visually assessed de novo coronary stenosis
in which the physiological severity of the lesion is in question (typically 40-70%
diameter stenosis).
5. Stable angina or acute coronary syndrome (non-culprit vessels only and outside of
primary intervention during acute STEMI)
Exclusion criteria:
1. Previous Coronary Artery Bypass surgery with patent grafts to the interrogated vessel
2. Significant left main stenosis (>50% narrowing)
3. Tandem stenoses separated by more than 10 mm that require separate pressure guide wire
interrogation or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (not to be interrogated or
treated as a single stenosis)
4. Total coronary occlusions (CTOs). NOTE: Patients with CTOs can be included if i)
treatment of the CTO is completed first, ii) the CTO PCI is successful, iii) the CTO
PCI is successful and iii) the physiological lesion is in another vessel
5. Restenotic lesions
6. Hemodynamic instability at the time of intervention (heart rate<50 beats per minute,
systolic blood pressure <90mmHg), balloon pump
7. Significant contraindication to adenosine administration (e.g. heart block, severe
asthma)
8. Contraindications to PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) or drug-eluting stent
(DES) implantation
9. Heavily calcified or tortuous vessels
10. Significant hepatic or lung disease (chronic pulmonary obstructive disease), and/or
malignant disease with unfavourable prognosis that may influence survival within the
next 5 years
11. Pregnancy
12. STEMI (ST elevation myocardial infarction) within 48 hours of procedure
13. Severe valvular heart disease
14. ACS patients in whom more than one target vessel is present
We found this trial at
7
sites
660 S Euclid Ave
Saint Louis, Missouri 63110
Saint Louis, Missouri 63110
(314) 362-5000
Washington University School of Medicine Washington University Physicians is the clinical practice of the School...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials