Timing of Direct Current Cardioversion (DCC) in Patients Undergoing Ablation of Persistent/Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
Status: | Completed |
---|---|
Conditions: | Atrial Fibrillation |
Therapuetic Areas: | Cardiology / Vascular Diseases |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 18 - Any |
Updated: | 2/11/2017 |
Start Date: | June 2009 |
End Date: | August 2015 |
Timing of DCC in Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Isolation Ablation (PVI) of Persistent/Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
The purpose of this study is to compare which strategy is superior in patients with
persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing ablation, direct current
cardioversion (DCC) prior to empirical pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ; or pulmonary vein
isolation (PVI)ablation in atrial fibrillation then Direct current cardioversion (DCC) if
the patient remains in atrial fibrillation.
persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing ablation, direct current
cardioversion (DCC) prior to empirical pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ; or pulmonary vein
isolation (PVI)ablation in atrial fibrillation then Direct current cardioversion (DCC) if
the patient remains in atrial fibrillation.
Ablation of persistent/permanent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) remains a challenge. There are
several strategies to improve the outcomes of persistent/permanent AF ablation. At the
Cleveland Clinic one of the commonly used strategies is Direct Current Cardioversion (DCC).
Depending on physician preference, patients may be ablated in atrial fibrillation then
Direct current cardioverted; or Direct current cardioverted and ablated in sinus rhythm.
Neither approach has been shown to be superior. As both approaches are currently being
performed based on physician preference, the investigators propose to study and compare both
approaches in a randomized fashion for evidence based practice.
The purpose of this study is to compare which standard of care strategy is superior in
patients with persistent/permanent Atrial Fibrillation undergoing ablation, direct current
cardioversion prior to empirical pulmonary vein isolation; or ablation in atrial
fibrillation then direct current cardioversion if the patient remains in atrial fibrillation
several strategies to improve the outcomes of persistent/permanent AF ablation. At the
Cleveland Clinic one of the commonly used strategies is Direct Current Cardioversion (DCC).
Depending on physician preference, patients may be ablated in atrial fibrillation then
Direct current cardioverted; or Direct current cardioverted and ablated in sinus rhythm.
Neither approach has been shown to be superior. As both approaches are currently being
performed based on physician preference, the investigators propose to study and compare both
approaches in a randomized fashion for evidence based practice.
The purpose of this study is to compare which standard of care strategy is superior in
patients with persistent/permanent Atrial Fibrillation undergoing ablation, direct current
cardioversion prior to empirical pulmonary vein isolation; or ablation in atrial
fibrillation then direct current cardioversion if the patient remains in atrial fibrillation
Inclusion Criteria:
- Persistent or long standing persistent AF resistant to anti-arrhythmic medication.
Must have been present for more than 2 months
- Therapeutic anticoagulation for at least three weeks prior to initiation of therapy,
or TEE performed prior to the procedure
- Age >= 18 years old. (Females must be either post-menopausal >12 months, practicing a
protocol-acceptable method of birth control
- Scheduled for Pulmonary Vein Isolation
- Amiodarone will be stopped at least 3 months prior to procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
- Reversible causes of AF such as pericarditis, hyperthyroidism
- Presently with Valvular Heart disease requiring surgical intervention
- Presently with coronary artery disease requiring surgical intervention
- Early Post-operative AF (within three months of surgery)
- Previous MAZE or left atrial instrumentation
- Life expectancy <= 2 years
- Social factors that would preclude follow up or make compliance difficult.
- Contraindication to the use of anti-arrhythmic medications and/or coumadin and
heparin
- Enrollment in another investigational drug or device study
- Patients with severe pulmonary disease
- Documented intra-atrial thrombus, tumor, or another abnormality which precludes
catheter introduction
We found this trial at
1
site
Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Clinic is committed to principles as presented in the United Nations Global...
Click here to add this to my saved trials