Characteristics of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Receiving Treatment With Dapagliflozin Versus Sitagliptin: An Analysis of Commercial Claims and Linked Laboratory Data



Status:Completed
Conditions:Diabetes, Diabetes
Therapuetic Areas:Endocrinology
Healthy:No
Age Range:18 - Any
Updated:4/29/2018
Start Date:March 31, 2017
End Date:May 31, 2017

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

Rationale: In order to compare the real-world use of commonly prescribed second-line oral
diabetes therapies, real-world data comparing patients receiving treatment with dapagliflozin
vs sitagliptin are needed, and limited resource use and cost data exist for patients
initiating dapagliflozin in the real-world setting.

Objectives:

Primary: The primary objective of this study is to compare real-world health care resource
utilization and costs following treatment with dapagliflozin versus sitagliptin. Secondary:
The secondary objectives of this study are to assess clinical outcomes and treatment patterns
among patients receiving treatment with dapagliflozin versus sitagliptin. Study Design:
Retrospective cohort study. Target Subject Population: Patients receiving treatment with
either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin will be evaluated.

Study Variable(s):

Primary Variables: Health care resource utilization and costs Secondary Variables:
Demographics measured at the index date, Quan-Charlson Comorbidity score, measured during the
baseline period, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-based comorbidity
measures, receipt of other antidiabetic medication classes during the baseline and follow-up
periods, number and percentage of patients with a diagnosis of obesity during the baseline or
follow-up periods, treatment patterns during the follow-up period (i.e., index dose, duration
of treatment, discontinuation, adherence, receipt of additional antidiabetic medication
classes), HbA1c outcomes (among subgroup of patients with linked laboratory data, sample size
permitting), renal impairment, hypoglycemia as defined by a claims-based algorithm.

Statistical Methods: Initial analyses will be descriptive in nature and entail the tabular
display of mean values, medians, ranges, and standard deviations of continuous variables of
interest (e.g., patient age) and frequency distributions for categorical variables (e.g.,
sex, geographic location). Outcomes will be compared between patients receiving dapagliflozin
versus sitagliptin using univariate tests. Propensity score matching will be undertaken to
reduce bias in the comparison of patients receiving treatment with dapagliflozin versus
sitagliptin. Following matching, demographics and baseline characteristics will be assessed
using standardized differences to determine balance in the post-matched sample. Outcomes will
be assessed using tests for paired data (paired t-tests, signed rank tests, McNemar's tests).

Rationale: In order to compare the real-world use of commonly prescribed second-line oral
diabetes therapies, real-world data comparing patients receiving treatment with dapagliflozin
versus sitagliptin are needed, and limited resource use and cost data exist for patients
initiating dapagliflozin in the real-world setting.

Objectives:

Primary:

The primary objective is to compare real-world health care resource utilization and costs
following treatment with dapagliflozin versus sitagliptin.

Secondary:

The secondary objectives of this study are to assess the following real-world data among
patients receiving treatment with dapagliflozin versus sitagliptin:

1. Patient demographic and baseline clinical and treatment characteristics

2. Treatment patterns, specifically dose at index date, duration of treatment, adherence,
discontinuation, and receipt of additional antidiabetic agents

3. Clinical outcomes after treatment augmentation, including hypoglycemic events, renal
impairment, and HbA1c

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of commercial medical and pharmacy claims along with
enrollment information and linked laboratory results between July 1, 2013 and April 30, 2016.

Target Subject Population: Patients receiving treatment with either dapagliflozin or
sitagliptin will be evaluated in this analysis. The date of the first observed claim for
either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin will define the index date. This study will use an
intent- to-treat population, and patients will remain in their defined study cohort for the
duration of the follow-up period, regardless of treatment changes. The baseline period will
be defined as the 6 months' pre-index date, and the follow-up period will be defined as the
12 months' post-index date (inclusive of the index date). Patients will be required to have
continuous health plan enrollment during the baseline and follow-up periods. Patients having
at least one claim with a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus in the baseline period or
gestational diabetes or evidence of pregnancy in the baseline or follow-up periods will be
excluded from the study population. Furthermore, patients will be excluded from the analysis
if they received a selective sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) or dipeptidyl peptidase
4 (DPP-4) inhibitor during the baseline period. Patients receiving treatment with
dapagliflozin will be matched on demographic, clinical, and economic characteristics to
patients receiving treatment with sitagliptin using the 1:1 propensity score matching
technique.

Study Variable(s):

Primary Variables: Health care resource utilization and costs

Secondary Variables:

1. Demographics measured at the index date

2. Quan-Charlson Comorbidity score, measured during the baseline period

3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-based comorbidity measures

4. Receipt of other antidiabetic medication classes during the baseline and follow-up
periods.

5. Number and percentage of patients with a diagnosis of obesity during the baseline or
follow-up periods

6. Treatment patterns during the follow-up period

7. HbA1c outcomes

8. Renal impairment

9. Hypoglycemia as defined by a claims-based algorithm

Statistical Methods:

All analyses including the assessment of patient demographics, patient characteristics, and
health care utilization and costs will be descriptive in nature and entail the tabular
display of mean values, medians, ranges, and standard deviations of continuous variables of
interest and frequency distributions for categorical variables. Prior to matching, outcomes
will be compared between patients receiving dapagliflozin versus sitagliptin using univariate
tests. In Phase 2, propensity score matching will be undertaken to reduce bias in the
comparison of patients receiving treatment with dapagliflozin versus sitagliptin. Following
matching, demographics and baseline characteristics will be assessed using standardized
differences to determine balance in the post-matched sample. Outcomes will be assessed using
tests for paired data.

Inclusion Criteria:

A prescription claim for either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin between on after January 1,
2014 (note: patients receiving dapagliflozin/metformin combination therapy (Xigduo),
sitagliptin/metformin (Janumet/Janumet XR), or sitagliptin/simvastatin (Juvisync) will be
included in the study population). The date of the first observed claim for either
dapagliflozin or sitagliptin will define the index date.

Continuous medical and pharmacy benefits for a 6-month baseline period.

At least 1 diagnosis of T2DM in any position (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes are
provided in accompanying Excel file) during the 6-month baseline period or during the 12-
month follow-up period

Exclusion Criteria:

Receipt of either a SGLT-2 inhibitor or DPP-4 inhibitor during the 6-month baseline period.

A diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in any position during the baseline period.

A diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or pregnancy in any position during the
6-month baseline period or 12-month follow-up period.
We found this trial at
1
site
?
mi
from
Wilmington, DE
Click here to add this to my saved trials