A Pilot Study: Safety & TOlerability of Hypertonic Saline Administration Via IntraOsseous Access



Status:Completed
Conditions:Cardiology, Neurology, Neurology
Therapuetic Areas:Cardiology / Vascular Diseases, Neurology
Healthy:No
Age Range:18 - Any
Updated:5/23/2018
Start Date:April 21, 2017
End Date:April 21, 2018

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

The OHIO Trial: A Pilot Study: Safety & TOlerability of Hypertonic Saline Administration Via IntraOsseous Access

Hypertonic saline is used to treat elevated intracranial pressure. Intraosseous vascular
access has been used to administer fluids and medications. This study combines these to
administer 3% hypertonic saline via IO.

HTS is used to mitigate and temporize intracranial pressure (ICP) elevations and cerebral
edema by creating an osmotic gradient across the cell wall. HTS is part of the elevated ICP
algorithm in the emergency neurologic life support protocols HTS is superior to mannitol
which is the alternate osmotherapy agent . HTS is typically administered via central vascular
access due to the concern that if extravasation of the infusion occurs, tissue damage from
cell implosion can occur

The IO route is generally accepted in resuscitation environments including the emergency
department, EMS, and military settings with some authors recommending the IO as a primary
method of obtaining emergency vascular access The adult advanced cardiac life support (ACLS)
guidelines recommend either intravenous or IO access.

A number of studies have established the safety of IO administration of hypertonic solutions.
Randomized adult pigs to IO 7.5% HTS, IO 3% HTS, and 0.9% isotonic saline and found regular
tissue morphology, no necrosis or microscopic ischemic changes in the HTS groups. Several
studies conducted to evaluate the efficacy of hypertonic solutions on resuscitation for
hemorrhagic shock used the IO route and did not make note of problems arising from the
administration of IO HTS. Another study using a canine model of hemorrhagic shock briefly
mentioned transient lameness in the IO HTS group, but this resolved by 48 hours . While the
majority of studies using hypertonic saline solutions did not make note of complications, one
study induced hemorrhagic shock in dehydrated swine and resuscitated one group with 7.5% HTS
and noted a high rate of local complications from soft tissue and bone marrow necrosis .

One study noted a subgroup of patients in which IO access was obtained on conscious patients.
None of the patients received local anesthetic and none reported pain during insertion.
Eighteen of the 22 conscious patients reported pain during fluid administration. Central
venous catheter (CVC) placement is the current standard of care; even with local anesthesia
it can be painful. Most of the potential subjects, due to the nature of their severe
neurologic injury, may not be affected by the pain associated with IO fluid administration.
Manufacturer literature suggests the use of lidocaine to anesthetize the bone before infusing
if possible (Teleflex).

It is expected that utilizing IO for vascular access in the ICU will be safe and tolerable.
If this study confirms the anticipated results, there are numerous implications. First,
neurologically injured patients requiring emergent HTS may have faster access to this
therapy. A study comparing IO to CVC access undergoing resuscitation in the emergency
department found IO to be faster to insert (2.3 vs. 9.9 minutes) and had fewer failures to
access on the first attempt. Second, serious complications from IO were absent compared with
severe to life-threatening mechanical complications from CVC including pneumothorax, damage
to the carotid artery, and bleeding which were cited at 0.7%-2.1% depending on site. And
thirdly, central line associated blood stream infections (CLABSI) are a leading cause of
hospital acquired infections in the ICU and are associated with higher mortality. CLABSI
rates are measured by number of infections per 1,000 catheter days and shorter CVC dwell time
is prudent. If a reliable and rapid source of vascular access could postpone or eliminate CVC
insertion, risk of CLABSI may be reduced. These potential benefits outweigh the minimal
expected risk.

Inclusion Criteria:

- NCCU patients in which osmotherapy with HTS is planned (standard of care

- Does not already have a CVC or PICC.

Exclusion Criteria:

- <18 years old

- Known pregnancy

- Long bone fracture in the targeted site

- Proximity to prosthetic joint

- Excessive tissue/absence of anatomical landmarks

- History of osteopetrosis

- Previous significant orthopedic procedure at site

- Prosthetic limb or joint

- IO catheter use in the past 48 hours of the target bone

- Infection at the area of insertion

- Hypersensitivity to lidocaine
We found this trial at
1
site
281 W. Lane Ave
Columbus, Ohio 43210
(614) 292-6446
Principal Investigator: Michel Torbey, MD
Phone: 614-293-4975
Ohio State University The Ohio State University’s main Columbus campus is one of America’s largest...
?
mi
from
Columbus, OH
Click here to add this to my saved trials