Comparison of Orbital Versus Rotational Atherectomy Effects On Coronary Microcirculation in PCI



Status:Completed
Conditions:Peripheral Vascular Disease, Cardiology
Therapuetic Areas:Cardiology / Vascular Diseases
Healthy:No
Age Range:18 - Any
Updated:3/28/2019
Start Date:January 25, 2017
End Date:March 16, 2019

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

Comparison of Orbital Versus Rotational Atherectomy Effects On Coronary Microcirculation in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)

The investigators hypothesize that the orbital atherectomy system (OAS), a newer generation
atherectomy device, reduces the incidence of microcirculatory compromise as compared to older
generation rotational atherectomy (RA) due to differences in the mechanism of
athero-ablation.

The presence of heavily calcified coronary lesions necessitates the use of ablative devices
that aid in successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, atherectomy devices
generate microparticles that embolize to the distal coronary microcirculation and may
compromise myocardial tissue perfusion.

Two mechanisms that deserve particular attention are the eccentric mounting of the OAS crown
and the higher flow rates on the vasodilator flush. Firstly, as opposed to rotational
atherectomy where the larger, centrally mounted burr may cause obstruction of flow during the
atherectomy, the smaller eccentrically mounted crown in OAS allows continuous perfusion
during both atherectomy as well as rest periods. Second, both during rest and atherectomy,
the flow rates of vasodilatory flush is higher in OAS compared to RA. Combined, these
differences in coronary and vasodilator flush flow could lead to improved perfusion of the
distal circulation, particularly during the atherectomy runs when risk of embolization is
highest.

The loss of microcirculatory function can be transient, with partial or complete restoration
of microcirculatory blood flow, or permanent. As shown in studies of patients with acute
coronary syndromes, the loss of microcirculatory function is a critical and independent
predictor of myocardial recovery and adverse outcomes. The putative protective effects of OAS
on coronary microvasculature may therefore be of major clinical significance and impact.

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age ≥ 18 years

2. Patient with an indication for PCI including:

- Angina (stable or unstable),

- Silent ischemia (a visually estimated target lesion diameter stenosis of ≥70%, a
positive non-invasive stress test, or FFR ≤0.80 must be present),

- Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)

3. Patients will undergo cardiac catheterization and possible or definite PCI with intent
to stent using any non-investigational metallic drug-eluting stent (DES)

4. Signed written informed consent

5. Heavily calcified (severe)lesions necessitating atherectomy.

Angiographic inclusion criteria:

1. The target lesion must be located in a native coronary artery with visually estimated
reference vessel diameter of ≥2.25 mm to ≤4.00 mm.

2. Lesion length between 20 mm and 50mm

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Estimated creatinine clearance <30 ml/min using Cockcroft-Gault equation, unless the
patient is on dialysis;

2. ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) within 24 hours of initial time of
presentation to the first treating hospital, whether at a transfer facility or the
study hospital.

3. PCI within 24 hours preceding the study procedure.

4. Cardiogenic shock (defined as persistent hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90
mm/Hg for more than 30 minutes) or requiring pressors or hemodynamic support,
including intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), at time of procedure.

5. Mobitz II second degree or complete heart block

6. Malignant ventricular arrhythmias requiring treatment

7. Pulmonary edema defined as patient with shortness of breath, evidence of volume
overload on physical exam, and crepitations on physical exam (>1/3 of lungs) or
radiographic interstitial or alveolar pulmonary edema

8. Subject is intubated.

9. Known left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%.

10. Severe valvular disease (e.g. severe mitral regurgitation or severe aortic stenosis)

11. Patient is participating in any other investigational drug or device clinical trial
that has not reached its primary endpoint.

12. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding (women of child-bearing potential must have a
negative pregnancy test within one week before treatment).

General Inclusion - MRI Sub-Study

1. Patients with no prior MI/scarring in the subtended myocardial territory.

2. Patients with no contraindication for MRI studies

3. Patients who could safely receive Gadolinium (i.e. estimated glomerular filtration
rate (eGFR) >30)

Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:

1. Lesion length <20mm

2. Study target lesion in a bypass graft

3. Ostial right coronary artery (RCA) study target lesion

4. Chronic total occlusion (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow 0/1) study
target lesion

5. Bifurcation study lesion with a planned dual stent strategy

6. In-stent restenosis study target lesion

General Inclusion - MRI Sub-Study

1. Patients with no prior myocardial infarction (MI)/scarring in the subtended myocardial
territory.

2. Patients with no contraindication for Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies

3. Patients who could safely receive Gadolinium (i.e. eGFR>30)
We found this trial at
1
site
116th St and Broadway
New York, New York 10027
(212) 854-1754
Phone: 212-305-7060
Columbia University In 1897, the university moved from Forty-ninth Street and Madison Avenue, where it...
?
mi
from
New York, NY
Click here to add this to my saved trials