A Comparison of Non-invasive Ventilation Methods Used to Prevent Endotracheal Intubation Due to Apnea in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
Status: | Recruiting |
---|---|
Conditions: | Women's Studies, Pulmonary |
Therapuetic Areas: | Pulmonary / Respiratory Diseases, Reproductive |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | Any |
Updated: | 7/5/2018 |
Start Date: | November 11, 2017 |
End Date: | June 1, 2019 |
Contact: | Claire Beaullieu, MD |
Email: | Catherine.C.Beaullieu@uth.tmc.edu |
Phone: | (713)500-6044 |
The purpose of this study is to determine whether nasal intermittent positive pressure
ventilation (NIPPV) reduces the need for endotracheal intubation in very low birth weight
infants with persistent apnea who fail nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP).
ventilation (NIPPV) reduces the need for endotracheal intubation in very low birth weight
infants with persistent apnea who fail nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP).
Inclusion Criteria:
- Infants born at < 30 weeks gestational age who develop clinically significant apnea
while on NCPAP > 6cm H2O or whose team is considering intubation due to apnea.
Consider clinically significant apnea as 1 or more events treated with bag-mask
ventilation or 3 episodes of apnea requiring stimulation within 1 hour.
- Infants on maximum caffeine therapy (10mg/kg/day)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Major congenital anomalies including congenital heart disease
We found this trial at
1
site
7000 Fannin St
Houston, Texas 77030
Houston, Texas 77030
(713) 500-4472
Phone: 713-500-6044
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston The University of Texas Health Science Center...
Click here to add this to my saved trials