Assessment and Rehabilitation of Central Sensory Impairments for Balance in mTBI
Status: | Recruiting |
---|---|
Conditions: | Neurology |
Therapuetic Areas: | Neurology |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 18 - 60 |
Updated: | 1/27/2019 |
Start Date: | September 2015 |
End Date: | September 2019 |
Contact: | Alexa Beeson, B.S. |
Email: | beesona@ohsu.edu |
Phone: | 503-418-2602 |
Our central hypothesis is that chronic balance deficits after mild traumatic brain injury
(mTBI) result from impairments in central sensorimotor integration (CSMI) that may be helped
by rehabilitation. There are two objectives of this proposal; the first objective is to
characterize balance deficits in people with mTBI. The second objective is to use a novel
auditory bio-feedback (ABF) device to improve measures central sensorimotor integration and
balance control.
(mTBI) result from impairments in central sensorimotor integration (CSMI) that may be helped
by rehabilitation. There are two objectives of this proposal; the first objective is to
characterize balance deficits in people with mTBI. The second objective is to use a novel
auditory bio-feedback (ABF) device to improve measures central sensorimotor integration and
balance control.
Objectives: This study as two parts: 1) Cross-sectional study (Aim I: Balance Assessment) to
identify and characterize maladaptive balance control strategies after mTBI compared to
healthy controls and 2) Interventional randomized pilot study (Aim II: Balance
Rehabilitation) using a novel ABF rehabilitation technique to ameliorate maladaptive balance
control strategies after TBI. Subjects in Aim II will be a subset from Aim I and studies will
occur simultaneously.
Plan: The proposed 4-year study has two parts: 1) Cross-sectional study (Aim I: Balance
Assessment) to identify and characterize maladaptive balance control strategies after mTBI
compared to healthy controls and 2) Interventional randomized pilot study (Aim II: Balance
Rehabilitation) using a novel ABF rehabilitation technique to ameliorate maladaptive balance
control strategies after TBI. Subjects in Aim II will be a subset from Aim I and studies will
occur simultaneously.
Methods: I) Balance Assessment: To characterize balance deficits in people with mTBI who have
chronic, non-resolving balance deficits compared to healthy control subjects without a
history of mTBI. We hypothesize that a) objective measures of central sensorimotor
integration, static and dynamic balance will better distinguish people with mTBI from control
subjects than clinical measures, b) a subset of people with mTBI will have abnormal central
sensori-motor integration (CSMI) test measures, even without peripheral vestibular or ocular
motor deficits c) the relationship between poorer static/dynamic balance performance and mTBI
is regulated/mediated by CSMI. We will test 130 subjects between the ages of 18 and 60; 65
with chronic (> 3 months) mTBI and non-resolving balance deficits and 65 healthy age and
gender matched control subjects without a history of mTBI. We will obtain objective measures
of static and dynamic balance using wearable inertial sensors and determine how these
measures relate to central sensorimotor integration. We will also obtain laboratory measures
of peripheral vestibular function and ocular motor function to help classify people and to
consider as potential covariates in rehabilitation efficacy.
II) Balance Rehabilitation: To determine the efficacy of a novel, ABF balance rehabilitation
program to improve central sensorimotor integration, static and dynamic balance, and
functional activity in patients with chronic mTBI. We hypothesize that a) CSMI scores will
improve with rehabilitation and ABF will increase the improvement of CSMI scores beyond the
standard of care, b) ABF intervention will improve objective summary measures of balance and
c) people with central sensorimotor integration impairment will show sustained improvement in
CSMI scores and balance after rehabilitation. We will randomize 40 subjects between the ages
of 21 and 50; 65 with chronic (> 3 months) mTBI and non-resolving balance deficits from Aim I
who have abnormal CSMI into either the ABF rehabilitation group or the standard of care
group. People will be tested before and after a 6-week intervention period and again 6 week
later to determine long-term changes. Normal/abnormal vestibular and ocular motor function
will be used as covariates to determine if peripheral deficits affect the efficacy of ABF
rehabilitation.
identify and characterize maladaptive balance control strategies after mTBI compared to
healthy controls and 2) Interventional randomized pilot study (Aim II: Balance
Rehabilitation) using a novel ABF rehabilitation technique to ameliorate maladaptive balance
control strategies after TBI. Subjects in Aim II will be a subset from Aim I and studies will
occur simultaneously.
Plan: The proposed 4-year study has two parts: 1) Cross-sectional study (Aim I: Balance
Assessment) to identify and characterize maladaptive balance control strategies after mTBI
compared to healthy controls and 2) Interventional randomized pilot study (Aim II: Balance
Rehabilitation) using a novel ABF rehabilitation technique to ameliorate maladaptive balance
control strategies after TBI. Subjects in Aim II will be a subset from Aim I and studies will
occur simultaneously.
Methods: I) Balance Assessment: To characterize balance deficits in people with mTBI who have
chronic, non-resolving balance deficits compared to healthy control subjects without a
history of mTBI. We hypothesize that a) objective measures of central sensorimotor
integration, static and dynamic balance will better distinguish people with mTBI from control
subjects than clinical measures, b) a subset of people with mTBI will have abnormal central
sensori-motor integration (CSMI) test measures, even without peripheral vestibular or ocular
motor deficits c) the relationship between poorer static/dynamic balance performance and mTBI
is regulated/mediated by CSMI. We will test 130 subjects between the ages of 18 and 60; 65
with chronic (> 3 months) mTBI and non-resolving balance deficits and 65 healthy age and
gender matched control subjects without a history of mTBI. We will obtain objective measures
of static and dynamic balance using wearable inertial sensors and determine how these
measures relate to central sensorimotor integration. We will also obtain laboratory measures
of peripheral vestibular function and ocular motor function to help classify people and to
consider as potential covariates in rehabilitation efficacy.
II) Balance Rehabilitation: To determine the efficacy of a novel, ABF balance rehabilitation
program to improve central sensorimotor integration, static and dynamic balance, and
functional activity in patients with chronic mTBI. We hypothesize that a) CSMI scores will
improve with rehabilitation and ABF will increase the improvement of CSMI scores beyond the
standard of care, b) ABF intervention will improve objective summary measures of balance and
c) people with central sensorimotor integration impairment will show sustained improvement in
CSMI scores and balance after rehabilitation. We will randomize 40 subjects between the ages
of 21 and 50; 65 with chronic (> 3 months) mTBI and non-resolving balance deficits from Aim I
who have abnormal CSMI into either the ABF rehabilitation group or the standard of care
group. People will be tested before and after a 6-week intervention period and again 6 week
later to determine long-term changes. Normal/abnormal vestibular and ocular motor function
will be used as covariates to determine if peripheral deficits affect the efficacy of ABF
rehabilitation.
Inclusion Criteria:
- have a diagnosis of mTBI based upon Veterans Health Administration (VHA)/Department of
Defense (DoD) criteria with persisting symptoms >3 months post injury
- have minimal cognitive impairment; a score between 0 and 8 on the Short Blessed test
for cognitive function
- may have or not had a loss of consciousness (LOC) with their initial injury
-OR-
- have no recent history of mTBI or brain injury and related complaints
Exclusion Criteria:
- have had or currently have any other injury, medical, substance or neurological
illness that could potentially explain balance deficits (e.g., Central Nervous System
disease, stroke, moderate TBI, lower extremity amputation)
- meet criteria for moderate to severe substance use disorder within the past month, as
defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-V)
- display behavior that would significantly interfere with validity of data collection
or safety during study
- be in significant pain during the evaluation (5/10 by patient subjective report)
- be a pregnant female (balance considerations)
- have past history of peripheral vestibular pathology or ocular motor deficits
- have significant hearing loss that would interfere with the use of an auditory
biofeedback device; hearing loss no worse than 30 decibel (dB) HL (PTA 0.5-3 kHz), in
better ear, with the difference in ears being less than 15 dB PTA
- be unable to abstain for 24 hours in advance of testing in the use medications that
might impair their balance (meclizine, scopolamine, benzodiazepines such as Valium,
sedatives such as Ambien, narcotic pain medications, and antihistamines)
We found this trial at
1
site
3181 Southwest Sam Jackson Park Road
Portland, Oregon 97239
Portland, Oregon 97239
503 494-8311
Phone: 503-418-2602
Oregon Health and Science University In 1887, the inaugural class of the University of Oregon...
Click here to add this to my saved trials