A Comparison of INSORB Staples With Metal Staples in Total Hip Replacement



Status:Completed
Conditions:Chronic Pain, Dermatology
Therapuetic Areas:Dermatology / Plastic Surgery, Musculoskeletal
Healthy:No
Age Range:18 - Any
Updated:2/1/2018
Start Date:July 2007
End Date:April 30, 2010

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

The purpose of this study is to compare the use of INSORB absorbable staples with metal
staples on surgical incision healing after total hip replacement. The study evaluates wound
healing, complications, and patient satisfaction regarding wound comfort and appearance after
surgery.

Subcuticular closure of wounds can provide superior results to percutaneous suture closure
due to the elimination of suture or staple tracts. These tracts can lead to infection and
migration of epithelial cells adding to scarring, and cross-hatching scars which remain after
healing. Absorbable staples can provide a rapid, secure, subcuticular closure of skin as an
alternative to the traditional, manual staple or suture closure. This study will compare
INSORB absorbable staples to externally applied standard metal staples with respect to
effectiveness of incision closure, acute healing, subject comfort level, security and
appearance after total hip replacement.

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patient is 18 years or older

- Patient or legal representative is able to understand and provide signed consent for
the procedure

- Patient is willing and able to return for required follow-up visits

- Patient needs a total hip arthroplasty surgical procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patient has an active infection

- Patient is enrolled in another similar study

- Patient has a known history of hepatitis

- Patient has a known history of HIV

- Patient has a known history of AIDs

- Patient has a known history of IV drug abuse
We found this trial at
1
site
Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
?
mi
from
Indianapolis, IN
Click here to add this to my saved trials